Re: [Amel Yacht Owners] Re: Batteries

James Alton


   I will really be looking forward to hearing how your Firefly batteries work out for you.  

   I am hearing that considerably more efficient solar panels ( +30%) could become available in the not too distant future and am really hoping that happens before I put up my arch.  These are the multilayered designs similar to the ones used for satellites but hopefully we be a lot less expensive or it won’t matter much if they become available or not.  This technology combined with Lithium batteries would be a real game changer.  I unfortunately agree with you that the Lithium Marine batteries are not quite to the point that I would want to put them in my boat for extended cruising at this time either.  One significant advantage of the Lithiums that has not been mentioned is the fact that they can have a very low self discharge rate so you can get back more of what you put into the battery.   The  energy density is much higher than the other options that I am aware of. 

   As for myself, I shipped two used German 8D Prevailer Gels over to Italy for Sueno and plan to add one more new one before bringing the boat back to Florida.  These batteries are amazingly reliable and long lasting..these are in fact now 16 years old and still seem to have between 90-95% of the rated capacity remaining based on a deep discharge/recharge test that I did before committing to shipping the batteries.  The batteries were used hard for about 7 years, removed from a boat and then have just been recharged every one to two years so they have not seen continuous usage.   The self discharge rate is very low so even after sitting for 2 years I would read between 12.5-12.6V before recharging.   One downside is that the energy density is lower than the other battery chemistries so for the same number of stored amps you need more batteries/weight.  On the other hand, you can cycle these batteries deeper than a flooded cell so the difference between these gels and the flooded in capacity is not as large as it initially appears to be but it is still there.  They also don’t suffer like a flooded battery if you don’t fully recharge them so unless    I am dockside, I don’t bother trying to bring them all of the way up.   One of the best features IMO is the extremely low/no gassing.    They are in fact marked safe for air transport.    Interestingly, the float on both the original battery charger and the alternators on my Maramu were already below 14 volts so I did not need make any changes to the charging system install these batteries.   It will be interesting to see how much longer these will last.  I have had a number of the Domestic Prevailers fail at around 10 years of age or less but I have not yet had one of the German ones fail so far.  Fort Lauderdale battery says that they have quite a few that are well over 20 years now that are still good.  Best of luck with the Fireflies,  they sound very promising!



SV Sueno,  Maramu #220


On Dec 10, 2017, at 12:52 PM, greatketch@... [amelyachtowners] <amelyachtowners@...> wrote:


You asked for comments on experience with Firefly batteries.  I don’t have any yet, but thought I would share our logic on our recent battery purchase.

First, I agree 100% with Bill Rouse that if your primary motivation is keeping the annual cost of batteries as low as possible, it is hard to beat flooded lead acid batteries. They do have a short lifespan, but are also really cheap, quite robust, and easy to get. Bill R’s point about making sure your charging system can match the charging curve of any kind of battery you pick is also critical.  This is a place where “close enough” is not close enough.

I do not think that Lithium batteries are quite to the point—yet—of being suitable for remote cruising.  They still seem fussy enough that I’d really want to be close to technical support if I had them. It is also likely that your engine alternator can not charge them.  Not because of voltage mismatch, but because Li batteries can accept full charging amps for almost the full charging cycle.  Very few alternators can supply their fully rated current for the time required to charge a Li battery.  The alternator will overheat and die. Alternators rated for continuous output at full rated current are rare and very expensive. Li batteries are probably the batteries of the future, whenever that gets here!

Harmonie has six year old Lifeline AGM batteries currently installed. The are just coming to the end of their useful life, with a capacity of about 60% of new.  On an annual basis, that puts them at almost exactly the same cost as flooded cells.  For those six years we have enjoyed not adding water, and a higher charge acceptance rate, so I would say the net effect is a positive, although not a huge one.

After much thinking and back and forth on the decision, we have decided to replace our aging AGMs with Firefly batteries--but not because we expect them to be cheaper than the alternatives.  My expectation is that they will last 3 to 4 times what a flooded cell bank would, so the amortized annual cost will be similar.

The reason we went with Firefly is because of their tolerance for extended periods at partial charge. They do not need to be regularly brought to 100% charge to live a long and happy life. This matters to me because my solar panels are capable of making 3.5 to 4.0 kW-hrs of power over the course of a sunny tropical day.  This should be enough to run the whole boat, but we can not currently store all that power.

We can not store that solar power because the batteries can not accept it.  We try to refill our AGM batteries as close to 100% every day possible. Once the they move out of the Bulk charge phase and into Acceptance (at about 85% Charge) the controller ramps back the power from the panels.  If we want the batteries full, we need to do the bulk charge in the morning with the generator, and let the solar system slowly top off the batteries over the course of the day. This means we only get to use only about half the power the solar panels could have produced.

With Firefly batteries we expect to run the batteries from 50% to 80% charge every (sunny) day using just the solar panels, and skip the generator--most days.  Our generator is getting old, with 7000+ hours.  If I can put off buying a new genset for a year, I will have paid back the premium price of the Firefly batteries.  My objective is to have a future owner of Harmonie be the one who has to buy her next genset.

We have a fully programable lines battery charger and solar charger, so we can get whatever charge curve we need.  The Fireflies charge at 14.4V (28.8V) which is the same as many flooded batteries, but if you are plugged in at the marina, or doing extended motoring, they want to float at 13.2V (26.4V) or LESS which is lower than other types of battery.  You need to be sure you can supply this lower voltage.

One significant drawback of the Firefly batteries is the availability is very tight.  Nobody has them in stock, and deliver schedules are spotty.  We ordered ours in August, were told that they would be available in October, and they are finally being delivered here in December.  Don't expect delivery right away.

Is my logic sound? 
Are the manufacturer claims and other testing of the Firefly batteries accurate?  
Will these batteries let me greatly reduce my generator run time without impacting battery life?  

I’ll get back to you in five years.  Or sooner if I am wrong!  

Bill Kinney
SM160, Harmonie
Fort Lauderdale, FL

Join { to automatically receive all group messages.