Re: [Amel Yacht Owners] Re: Props and rpm
Jose, I would have already bought an Autoprop and almost did, until I was informed that the shaft housing had not been modified as on later models to accept the Autoprop.toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
From: jvenegas@... [amelyachtowners]
Sent: Sun, May 13, 2018 12:24 pm
Subject: Re: [Amel Yacht Owners] Re: Props and rpm
I did some studying when I was buying a prop for my previous Beneteau 361. I found that selecting the type of folding prop depended on the objective. If it is to reduce drag while sailing the Flexofold or Max prop are pretty good doing that, and better than the Auto-prop which, at low wind conditions tends to take strange configurations causing extra drag. In the category the Max prop because its blades are flat has the lowest drag.
If the objective is to minimize fuel consumption during motoring, the blade of the Flexofold and the Autoprop are better shaped with an angle of attack that is reduced from the center outwards (twist). This is important because the speed of the blade relative to the water increases with the radius of a rotating object. The Autoprop blades have a constant angle of attack (flat blades) which is less efficient and can cause flow separation, turbulence, and possibly cavitation reducing thei r efficiency.
Finally, if optimizing fuel consumption while motor-sailing is the objective, the Autoprop is best as it adjusts its angle of attack as the wind increases and keeps the prop working efficiently. Fix pitched props like the Flex or Max as the wind increases they end up spinning adding little power.
In summary, If cost is not the issue, I find that the Autoprop is Ideal for those of us that tend to motor-sail when the wind is low or comes from the nose.
My 5 cents.
Ipanema SM2K 278