Re: Solar panels stainless steel mounted vs soft panels



What is the resulting loss of energy converted to? 
Remember E = mc2
I assume heat, so where is the heat, and what is its significance?


CW Bill Rouse Amel Owners Yacht School
Address: 720 Winnie, Galveston Island, Texas 77550 
View My Training Calendar

On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 9:46 AM Patrick McAneny via <> wrote:
Paul, I did not realize that you lost efficiency or  output by connecting the panels in series. I am far from an electrical engineer ,I wish I were,it would make owning an Amel easier. I may be better off replacing my three, 8 yr. old 17v panels ( in series) with three 36v panels . I am going bald scratching my head ,I had a full head of thick fur when I bought this boat.
SM Shenanigans

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Osterberg <osterberg.paul.l@...>
Sent: Tue, Aug 31, 2021 10:30 am
Subject: Re: [AmelYachtOwners] Solar panels stainless steel mounted vs soft panels

No it does not, and most 100 w panel's are 36 cell 18 v panels ( nominal 12 v)  you need to have them in serie to charge 24 v, very inefficient. We replaced or 2x 100 watt panels with 2x150 w 36 v panels. Now in August I get around 0,6 kWh from the two. From one 400 w panel I got 2.5 kWh. I'm on Last Palmas Canary Islands. During ideal conditions in June I got 0,8 kWh resp 3.0 kWh from the above. I have 2 rail mounted panels 2x180 w now in a marina they are titled up vertically a very poor way to keep them but lack of space force me to have them that way.. They outperform the soft on the Bimini giving CA 0,85 kWh

Join to automatically receive all group messages.