toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Hi Brent et al,
You can sail incredible miles off shore and never experience life threatening conditions. In all my miles, 50,000 plus in Ocean Pearl, I have not. But in my previous boat once on a return from Vanuatu to New Zealand. When that "once" happens you want to be ready.
In my once the seas were noticeably taller than our 14 meter mast. They were incredibly steep. We were fore reaching under half a storm jib. Going up the face of the waves the crests were breaking down on us. Every so often three waves would climb on top of each other and break like a huge wave on a surf beach. They were the killers. Only two hit us. One hit the stern with a whump that spun the stern sideways 45 degrees. The other broke right over us more than 2 meters deep. We had prepared the boat well. The decks were clear, our life raft was lashed down at the back of the cockpit with quick release lashing. And importantly the companionway was only ever briefly opened (very briefly) on the change of helmsman or the passing of food
A Bavaria that had circumnavigated met its "once" recently with then same skipper, only a few mile out from NZ. Swamped by a wave and sunk in 20 minutes. Thousands of yachts designed for the inshore charter market cross oceans and circumnavigate. So long as they don't meet that "once" weather all is well
Because of Henri's design, purposed for oceanic voyaging Amel yachts can take conditions in their stride that would be life threatening on others. One of those design features is monumental storage so the decks can be clear.
I was concerned when I mounted the solar on the life rails. I intended to change but they have never been an issue. They are clamped and strong wind gusts can swivel them, no brace. If I had weather coming like my "once" I could remove them in 5 minutes. Likewise, the deck stowed dinghy. Deflate and store below. I hope I never meet another "once". But if I do I want to be ready
On 22 October 2021 at 00:54 "Brent Cameron via groups.io" <brentcameron61@...> wrote:
I’m curious if anyone has had huge breaking waves across the stern of an Amel that would be high enough to get at the panels on an arch. I’ve been out in some (for me at least) boisterous conditions in the North Atlantic but nothing that even remotely looked like it would come aboard despite following seas higher than the arch and the boat surfing down the steep waves under minimal sails. I’ve seen the bow and the cockpit take breaking waves a few times but never the stern. That said I’m a complete Newb so I certainly don’t look at my extremely limited experience as indicative.
It seems to me that you’d have to have massive breaking waves over the stern to do real damage assuming that the arch design can handle the wind loads (the forces do go up with the square of the wind velocity though so the difference between 45 knots which I’ve seen and 90 knots Is 400% more force). I wouldn’t trivialize the forces involved as we know of at least one Amel that looks to have been lost in part because their “arch” setup came apart in the very high winds and the panel(s) became vertical (which weather cocked the boat so it became unmanageable in severe conditions - there were other contributing issues but as I’ve learned from my flying days, these things quickly add up and can overwhelm the crew and result in tragedy).
The other scenario where it comes to mind that the boat could take breaking waves would be when using a Jordan Series Drogue. I know that Eric has had good experience with using these in survival conditions (I also know that Kimberlite doesn’t have an arch!) but don’t know if it results in the stern getting submerged by breaking waves or not so I guess we should factor that scenario in as well.
Wouldn’t the enclosed cockpit also be an issue in those conditions? I seem to remember Eric saying that he had his full enclosure up when Kimberlite was swamped. I know how wonderful it is to be “inside” in boisterous conditions so would be very reluctant to take it down as long as I could safely be at the helm.
Danny, I know you have your solar panels mounted on the lifeline rails. Wouldn’t they also take as much or even more of a load too (assuming that you don’t take them down before hand of course)? I guess they have quite a bit less surface area than panels on an arch but they are lower so I’d think more likely to get dunked. I’d be interested in knowing if your panels have ever been an issue as I know that you have faced some very significant conditions. Do you leave them in perpendicular position as long as they are up? I certainly like the look of the boat without an arch better.
I also see a lot of Amel’s out there with Paddleboards, wind surfers, engines, fuel and scuba tanks (and life rafts) mounted on the rails. Those would seem to me to be even more risky as they are lower down and perpendicular to the forces involved (surface area is directly proportional to the forces - double the surface area and double the forces). An arch has the panels mostly parallel to the potential forces so the horizontally mounted solar panels would have MUCH less drag than say a paddle board).
Force is 1/2 times Density of the fluid (air can be considered to be such) times Surface Area times Co-efficient of Drag times Velocity squared. You can adjust the surface area by adjusting the orientation of the object but everything else is more or less constant except of course for the wind velocity so it behoves us to keep this in mind as we add stuff to the outside of our boats. (The Cd is different for a paddle board on edge versus on the perpendicular but for a solar panel, it would be considered as 1 in either case as they aren’t really aerodynamic in any specific orientation).
Another factor to consider is the weight out at the ends of the boat (this isn’t just an arch issue). Adding weight whether on decks or in the lockers will change the design handling of the boat.
Perhaps a good compromise would be to have an easy way to quickly disconnect the panels and put them below in severe conditions. That would obviously entail foreknowledge of upcoming conditions as you wouldn’t be able to remove them in much more than mild breezes but I suspect that lifeline mounted panels would face the same problem (although to be fair, I’d much rather be standing on deck than climbing an arch at sea!). I’m sure a tilting/sliding rail mounted system could be devised so that the panels could be easily disconnected at deck level as well with a bit of forethought.
I’m not second guessing ANYONE about their decisions here - sailboats are a compromise by their very nature but I’m genuinely curious about the pros and cons so that I can make my own risk/reward evaluation when the time comes. I know that most of us would never plan to be out there in those sorts of conditions but as Forest Gump says “$h.t happens!” I like Amel’s new hardtops with solar panels.
On Oct 21, 2021, 5:22 AM -0400, Scott SV Tengah <Scott.nguyen@...>, wrote:
Your setup sounds perfect for your intended use! I agree with your prioritization, too.
And if you ever decide to go lithium, all you really need to do is buy Victron smart lithium batteries and add a ve.bus BMS. Can you run the washing machine? I can't remember who, but another Amel could not run their washing machine with a 3kw inverter, which was surprising.
We went through a lot of brain damage with our dinghy too. We have the CL310 with a 20hp 4 stroke Suzuki. The dinghy will fit, albeit not perfectly, on the davits. A 340 would be better for the davits but we always keep the dinghy on the aft deck on passage and sized it to fit perfectly on the deck so we're happy we got the 310. Some will optimize for davit use and in that case, they should get a 340.
By the way, definitely change your davit fall (aka lifting lines) to dyneema if you haven't already. Very easy to do and makes them so much nicer to use. Don't pay Simpson 4000gbp or whatever they want for the "conversion kit" - you can do it yourself for much cheaper.
Regarding Danny's concerns about arches and weather, I've attached a photo of our arch shortly after we installed it and here are a few situations we've found ourselves in since then:
- 45 knots in the Gulf of Lyon with short and steep breaking waves
- Mid November passage from Virginia, though the Gulf Stream, to the Caribbean, with up to 60 knot winds
- A very unpleasant 2800nm upwind/up current passage from Hawaii to French Polynesia. A fellow Amel owner felt the passage tough enough that he had his rigging inspected afterwards. A non-Amel lost their mast and another boat had their keel come loose.
I haven't been in hurricane force winds, but given what we've experienced so far and given my risk tolerance, the benefits are definitely worth it. Of course, by saying that, we're going to have it ripped off the next time we go on passage!
2007 A54 #69
Future Amel Owner & Amel Owner Registry Moderator
Oro-Medonte, Ontario, Canada