Re: [Amel] Re: HF Radio
Conn Williamson <connwilliamson@...>
Thanks for that Joel, The seperate antenna sounds like a better alternative to me.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
--- On Wed, 25/5/11, Joel F. Potter <jfpottercys@...> wrote:
From: Joel F. Potter <jfpottercys@...> Subject: RE: [Amel] Re: HF Radio To: amelyachtowners@... Received: Wednesday, 25 May, 2011, 9:51 PM Conn, I can echo the sentiments expressed about SSB HF radio. Having been fortunate to have resold hundreds of experienced Amel boats, I can tell you the most honest opinion comes from folks that have been there, done that ,and are now finished and moving on to other adventures other than cruising. No ax to grind, they are a wealth of what works and what does not. Nearly every last soul has said that SSB/HF is one of the best items aboard all things considered. The webs and nets are essential and the inexpensive if not as sexy (or fast!) data transfer capability of radio make it a real work horse for the cruising sailor. Many prefer otherwise, but one way to rig the boat the strongest and to add versatility is to have a separate SSB/HF antenna, which also costs a bit more than insulators last time I did one for a client. Plus, if the rigger buggers it up and the rig comes down, you can call him on your SSB with the separate whip antenna, and inform him of your great displeasure... I know folks in the group either love or hate whip antenna but one client lost his rig and was able to alert those waiting that he would be somewhat delayed so they wouldn't worry. He also had them start the assembly of another rig without swage fittings... All the best, Joel F. Potter Joel F. Potter - Cruising Yacht Specialist, LLC Amel's Sole Associate for the Americas 401 East Las Olas Boulevard, #130-126 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Phone: (954) 462-5869 Email: jfpottercys@... <http://www.yachtworld.com/jfpottercys> www.yachtworld.com/jfpottercys |
|