Nomad- sails
sailormon <kimberlite@...>
Hi Nomad, I heard from North sails SXM that they made sails for you . I would like to discuss them backchannel. Gavin at FKG asked to look at Kimberlites head foil. Are you having a problem? Fair Winds Eric Kimberlite SM 376
|
|
Re: Main Sail Roller Battens
I hope this will end the already long discussion and explain the reasoning behind my willingness to try something different from vertical battens on my SM. My experience as a mechanical engineer is only 40 years but I have always evaluated critically every modification I have made to my boats. In principle, I see the vertical battens as a bad design waiting for disasters like those experienced by Michael. I do understand that sail makers are by definition conservative and thus Dave’s skepticism. Sails have been around for thousands of years and worked well with minimal changes. Adding new features always brings the risk for failures and, if I made sails for a living, I would also be skeptical and conservative. However I am not sure these roller-battens have been used in the manner we plan to do it. I can see how the roller battens, installed as full battens and perpendicular to the mast as shown in the website, can have problems. Using them like that in addition to making wider the folded sail, they exacerbate the problem brought up by Dave : as the sail is furled, each turn will make incremental motions of the inner part of the stainless batten relative to the outer part. The more turns the more this happen and the greater the force the tip of the inner half of the batten will do against the batten cover. By putting the roller battens perpendicular to the leach it makes them shorter than if they were placed horizontal or vertical, and thus they will have less turns and make the furled sail less wide. In addition, when placed perpendicular to the leach with a length such that only 40% of them extends over the leach, the sail damage when battens are too short will be prevented. More important, the widening of the furled sail will be reduced because the battens will roll in a corkscrew shape. I am also expecting that they may reduce the likelihood of the leach folding on itself and jamming the sail when it is furled with little wind. In any case I am willing to take the chance, knowing that if I am wrong it is for reasons that I am still not aware of. So far Dave’s skepticisms has been very helpful to identify key potential problems and for formulating solutions. Unless he or any other person identifies additional problems with the roller-batten idea I will proceed with the project, keep an eye on the battens, and will keep you posted on my progress or failure. Jose
|
|
Mainsail battens
Anne and John Hollamby <annejohnholl@...>
Hello Craig,
It was interesting to find that when I specified vertical
battens for a new mainsail on my Oyster in the late nineties the sailmaker,
Doyles in New Zealand, told me that when they laid my old mainsail on top of the
new one with vertical battens, they found the new one was 7% bigger. It was very
good and there were no problems
So far as I know the purchaser of that boat in 2000 found it
good for many years when he circumnavigated over a number of years.
Similarly the new mainsail I had made by Lee Sails in Hong
Kong has been excellent although I should add that I ordered it through a
Maltese sailmaker who also fitted the new sails when they came and he made some
small adjustments at my request.
Best wishes, Anne and John, Bali Hai, SM 319, for sale
in Malta
|
|
Re: Main Sail Roller Battens
Hi Jose,
Just another data point for your experiment is that the fellows that developed the Flattens I posted about last week said they are installed at Luff-90 - perpendicular to the Luff, not the Leach. That way when they roll up they actually make the sail roll tighter - like the measuring tape analogy you used wherein the tape rolls up on itself, not crosswise to its natural cupped shape. Anyway, will follow with great interest - sounds like a good idea, notwithstanding our resident sailmaker's doubts. Keep us posted. Cheers, Craig
|
|
Re: [Amel Yacht Owners] Jordan Sea Drogue-video in a hurricane
Bill & Judy Rouse <yahoogroups@...>
Eric, Done Bill
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 7:56 AM, sailormon kimberlite@... [amelyachtowners] <amelyachtowners@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: [Amel Yacht Owners] Jordan Sea Drogue-video in a hurricane
sailormon <kimberlite@...>
Hi Bill, Would you please email me the copy of the Onan heat exchanger grounding strap parts page. I can’t print it out and mine is grounded differently. Fair Winds Eric Kimberlite SM 376
Kimberlite@...
From: amelyachtowners@... [mailto:amelyachtowners@...]
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2014 1:37 AM To: amelyachtowners@... Subject: RE: [Amel Yacht Owners] Jordan Sea Drogue-video in a hurricane
Eric, Interesting. I assume if you have too few cones, the angle to the waves increases above 20 to 30 degrees. Am I correct? BTW, we have a drogue exactly like yours. It has never been wet...yet. Bill Rouse On Nov 26, 2014 3:34 AM, "sailormon kimberlite@... [amelyachtowners]" <amelyachtowners@...> wrote:
Dear Jean-Pierre, I can’t really explain what it is like on a drogue but you do not slide down the back of a wave. Imagine a duck sitting on the water . The duck just goes up and down the waves. The waves just run under the boat and you never have to worry about pitch poling or slamming backwards down a have. I hope you never have to experience it but it is quite interesting to watch the drogue in action and experience the smooth ride. You will probably be sitting at about 20-30 degrees to the waves due to the windage on the boat. Fair Winds Eric Kimberlite SM 376
From: amelyachtowners@... [mailto:amelyachtowners@...]
Dear Eric,
Thank you for your comments.
I have Davits, solar panels and HF whip antenna installed on the stern… obviously, I will have to engineer a few “boat specific” changes to make it work well. I will be on the boat in 3 weeks.
Your point is taken regarding the 147 cones … I will go for that. I still dont want to go downhill astern on the back side of the wave… :-)
Anecdote: A friend was a tank commander in the past and if they missed a downshift (before auto trans in tanks) when going uphill, then the tank would start moving backwards down the hill… they did not like that as the brakes were not man enough to stop the beast … he called it “Mexican overdrive” and said it was not fun!
Many thanks,
Jean-Pierre Germain Eleuthera SM007
Jean-Pierre Germain,
|
|
Re: Main outhaul gearbox
Hi John,
Hmmm, when I'm on the Amel Yahoo Group website there is a "search" box into which you enter the posting number. Craig
|
|
Re: No response from Amel
Hi Stephen,
The SM and SN have the same reduction gear. The difference is the SM drives it with a 24v motor and SN with a 12v motor and so gets more power. It is the same unit that Amel bought and installed on our boats when they made them. Good luck with it, Craig s/v Sangaris, SN#68
|
|
Re: Main Sail Roller Battens
Dave_Benjamin
Jose, If you're using the Rutgerson, the results are quite predictable. They will fail and damage the sail. If you use short battens, you'll be limited as to the amount of leech hollow you can eliminate. You will also have excessive wear at the inboard ends of the pocket. If you look at any of my conventional mains, you can see that the partial battens are about half the girth of the sail. Most sailmakers have gotten away from the short leech battens for that and other reasons. I don't know what will occur with making the pockets at a 90 degree angle to the leech, but it will be interesting to see. As a sailmaker, if I owned a SM, I probably wouldn't bother with battens of any variety. My old Maramu had a conventional rig which suited me fine. Vertical battens have proven to be an acceptable compromise so it's a mystery to me why you would go to great expense and have ongoing repair needs just to reduce the leech hollow somewhat. ---In amelyachtowners@..., <jvenegas@...> wrote : David, Thank you for bringing up this key point . I will be happy to be a guiney pig with this design as I cant see myself puting rigid vertical battens on my amel. Some times innoavation comes through those who are willing to take the risks. Jose
|
|
Re: No response from Amel
stephen_lees@...
Craig, I have SM53 #349, SV Sequel. Not sure if the Santorin setup is the same. I have had other posts that offer interesting leads. If you think your source is the same for the Super Maramu please let me know.
Thanks, Stephen SV Sequel SM53 #349
|
|
Re: Main Sail Roller Battens
David, Thank you for bringing up this key point . I will be happy to be a guiney pig with this design as I cant see myself puting rigid vertical battens on my amel. Some times innoavation comes through those who are willing to take the risks. Jose
|
|
Main outhaul gearbox
Anne and John Hollamby <annejohnholl@...>
Hello Craig,
Thanks for giving a source but please note that to find it
again in a few months time one would have to enter “no response from Amel as the
subject in the search box and hope.
John, Bali Hai, SM319, for sale in Malta
Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2014 2:27 PM
Subject: [Amel Yacht Owners] Re: No response from
Amel Stephen - go back to posting 18866 and 18867. What is your boat and where are you? Craig Briggs - SN#68 Sangaris, Florida
|
|
Re: No response from Amel
Stephen - go back to posting 18866 and 18867. What is your boat and where are you?
Craig Briggs - SN#68 Sangaris, Florida
|
|
Mainsail furling gearbox
Anne and John Hollamby <annejohnholl@...>
Suppliers of these have been given several times on this site
over the years, Try searching under this reference and the more likely one “main
outhaul gearbox” which is the same supplier. I recall giving the name of the
French supplier and the British Agent probably ten years ago and others giving
the details much more recently. If I were not so senile I would try to find the
details for you.
In practice it is only the big bronze drive gear that needs
changing, other parts can be found at any good bearing supplier to be found in
the Yellow Pages.
Good luck, Anne and John, Bali Hai, SM319, for
sale in
Malta
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2014 6:50 PM
Subject: Re: [Amel Yacht Owners] Re: No response from
Amel
Try Riza at Emek Marine. I believe he manufactures these....
At least ask....
GL
|
|
Re: Main Sail Roller Battens
Dave_Benjamin
Jose,
Good luck. Let us know how it works out. Every other sailmaker I know who has tried them won't recommend them. But maybe your guy knows something those guys with a few hundred years of combined experience don't know and we will all learn from him. The issue is the steel coming out of the protective covering and damaging the sail. That's been the recurring problem with these battens. I I were to use one, I'd go with Robichaud. They're a small company and the service I receive from them is phenomenal.
|
|
Re: [Amel Yacht Owners] Re: No response from Amel
Jean-Pierre Germain <jgermain@...>
Try Riza at Emek Marine. I believe he manufactures these.... At least ask.... GL
On 28 Nov 2014, at 18:25, stephen_lees@... [amelyachtowners] <amelyachtowners@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: No response from Amel
stephen_lees@...
I called Emilie over 2 weeks ago after two emails without response. She was very pleasant, speaks English very well and said they were researching my request for a new main furling transmission/gear box. I had sent photos as well with my original email. Emilie indicated that they would probably have a response by Friday. I have heard nothing back including a polite followup email asking for an update. Any more suggestions?
|
|
Re: Main Sail Roller Battens
Dave, that makes me feel better bacause I am not at all concerned about sail damage. These battens, once the tip is flexed, become very easy to roll creating minimal friction between the sail and the mast slot. Just see how flexible becomes a slanley measuring tape once you have beent it backwards.
Jose
|
|
Re: [Amel Yacht Owners] Re: No response from Amel
Ann-Sofie Svanberg <kanalmamman@...>
Call them! Emelie speaks very good english. /Annsofie S/Y Lady Annila SM 232 Skickat från min iPad
|
|
Jordan Series Drogue - I HAVE ONE FOR SALE
blowinahoudy <no_reply@...>
I purchased a new Jordan Series Drogue from Ace Sailmakers (East Lyme, CT) in 2009 prior to a circumnavigation with the World Arc. This is for up to 45,000 lb loaded monohull. Their price for nylon double braid and with two bridle legs and chafe gear was $2,266. For New England Ropes Endura the price was $3,383 and I bought this one as it is lighter and takes up less space. 156 cones. It has never been used (which is just fine with me). It needs 20-25 lb weight for its end. Will sell for $2,400. Contact Joseph Metz, cell 772-539-2425, email josephrmetz@.... Located in Maine but can ship.
|
|