Re: [Amel Yacht Owners] Furling Gearbox Differences
James, There are entire libraries filled with heavy books, theses, knowledgeable opinions, about the respective merits of grease and oil. You can spend the upcoming winter making up your mind if you have the courage to investigate thoroughly this particular issue. Take the plunge, make your own decision about what fits your particular circumstances. Jean Boucharlat Formerly SM 232
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
From: amelyachtowners@... [mailto:amelyachtowners@...] Sent: vendredi 10 novembre 2017 05:29 To: amelyachtowners@... Subject: Re: [Amel Yacht Owners] Furling Gearbox Differences What is the consensus of others, then, regarding using gear oil versus grease for the furlor and outhaul gearboxes? Indeed, it would seem that gear oil would be the appropriate lubrication, but I look to those smarter than me… James If you are going to disassemble the gearbox, why not just fill it with SAE90 oil? That will do a much better job of keeping the gears lubricated than grease. Grease tends to get thrown off gears as they turn and doesn't stay where the gears are meshed, which is what you really want to lubricate. On the hard, raising the waterline
|
|
Re: [Amel Yacht Owners] Help winterize Amel SM 2000 in US
Oliver , The address is correct , but I recieved no email from you. Pat
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
-----Original Message-----
From: Oliver Buhlert obuhlert@... [amelyachtowners]
To: amelyachtowners
Sent: Fri, Nov 10, 2017 2:47 am
Subject: Re: [Amel Yacht Owners] Help winterize Amel SM 2000 in US
Pat,
I wrote an e-mail to your privat account sailw32@..., is it the right address, did you get it?
Oliver
SV JoEmi
SM 2000 No. 397
Oliver, I live on the Sassafras River at the north end of the Bay. I just hauled my boat a few hours ago and will winterize it in the next few days. Is your water maker pickled ? Where is your boat located ?
Pat
SM Shenanigans
-----Original Message-----
From: qmvwv3fna4dth3r32bdwtz3bpy7meopg2s2xlnuq@... [amelyachtowners] < amelyachtowners@...>
To: amelyachtowners < amelyachtowners@...>
Sent: Thu, Nov 9, 2017 2:20 pm
Subject: [Amel Yacht Owners] Help winterize Amel SM 2000 in US
Hello,
and thank you for the answers to find a high quality rope for our boat.
We are looking for a very experienced AMEL SM 2000 owner or previous AMEL SM 2000 owner, who can help us to winterize our boat in the US, Chesapeake Bay.
Actually it seams difficult for us to fly in from Europe. We are in a Marina with a very good and experienced Boatyard, but like we all know, an AMEL owner knows the AMEL much better.
If someone could help us, or could recommend someone please contact us.
Oliver
SV JoEmi
SM 2000 No. 397
|
|
Re: [Amel Yacht Owners] phased electronics replacement
Hi James,
Try flyboyscd at Gmail dot com, and I'm happy to pass on anything info we have.
Steve Aloha SM72
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
On Nov 9, 2017, at 21:19, James Cromie jamescromie@... [amelyachtowners] < amelyachtowners@...> wrote:
Steve - I’d like to ask you about your planning for Panama. Perhaps you would be willing to pass along your personal contact. I am at jamescromie “at" yahoo “dot” com.
Hey Pat,
I was hoping you guys were going to make it South this season. At least the eastern Caribbean should be put back together by next year. We just got to Panama, and will spend the next couple of months mostly in the San Blas, prior to sorting our canal transit for February.
My experience with the interphase was good, but it was 15 years ago with an almost new unit. Aloha had one when we purchased her, but it had not worked for a while, and we ripped it out. I'm hoping Raymarine comes out with one, as I have all new Raymarine electronics I installed back in April, and am happy with all of it. After my recent experience, it seems like a more critical piece of equipment to have.
Aloha, Steve Steve, I had interphase and found it erratic . The B&G forward scan is much better and would definitely have shown a large rock or ledge. Another nice feature, even when not in the scan mode and without it displayed on the plotter , you have a green area displayed on the plotter in front of your boat that turns to yellow as the depth decreases and then turns red when you enter an area of dangerous depth , that you set up. Just looking at You Tube of the San Blas , looks beautiful , thinking of doing it next winter. Have Fun ! Pat SM Shenanigans
-----Original Message----- From: Stephen Davis flyboyscd@... [amelyachtowners] < amelyachtowners@...> To: amelyachtowners < amelyachtowners@...> Sent: Thu, Nov 9, 2017 12:25 pm Subject: Re: [Amel Yacht Owners] Re: phased electronics replacement My 2 cents worth...2 days ago we were slowly navigating down a remote uncharted bay in the less traveled Eastern San Blas of Panama. We were using the the Eric Bauhaus charts from "The Panama Cruisers Guide". His chart indicated 15 meters, and we were indicating 54' on the sounder just creeping along. We went from 54' to hitting something and coming to a rapid stop in the blink of an eye. We were able to back off, and immediately showed 54' again. The water was brown, and Liz was spotting on the bow with no indication that anything was ahead of us. Fortunately, we were going slow, and other than some scratches on the iron part of the keel, no harm done.
Moral of the story is a functional forward looking sonar may have prevented this, and giving me the confidence to continue instead of turning around as we did. I have used an old interphase unit many years ago in Hawaii, and even with the older technology, I found it very useful.
Regards,
Steve Davis Aloha SM 72 Puerto Lindo, Panama Pat,
I have not installed forward scanning sonar. At least, not yet.
It has been a quite a while since I last evaluated forward sonars, so my comments might be very out of date.... The ability to actually display something I felt I could easily interpret in real time at a useful level of precision didn't impress me. The times we bump bottom we are going from 6.9 feet to 6.5, not from 40 feet to 5 feet. I know some people swear by them, so there is utility there I am not seeing.
Double that on the power usage of the 3G radar! We routinely leave the radar on at sea now. One of the downsides people have listed about the broadband radars is that they are not as good at rain/squall detection. I don't see it. On our trip down here we wer e regularly seeing rather light squall activity well before the rain started to fall to the surface. For weather tracking and avoidance at sea, the 3G certainly meets my needs, even if it can't pick out a spot of drizzle at 20 miles!
It was good to meet you,
Bill Kinney SM160, Harmonie LMC, Fort Lauderdale, FL
---In amelyachtowners@..., wrote : Bill, Due to a lightning strike we had every instrument on the boat replaced from tv antenna to ssb , everything. I chose to go with all B&G , 12 inch plotter at the helm and a 9 in. at the nav . station. I opted for the Forward Scan , it seemed erratic , with the image of the bottom spiking up and down , while in an area with a flat bottom (Chesapeake Bay ) . I could place no faith in it to accurately depict what was in front of me. I installed a new transducer , as suggested by a B&G rep. , I have yet been able to test it out, and will be hauling the boat asap . My question, do you find the forward scan to accurately depict an image of the bottom , or is the image erratic , showing the bottom depth shoot up and down. I thought that perhaps the mud bottom we have here does not reflect well and maybe it works better in a sand / coral bottom . I also really like the radar and it uses very little power . It was nice to meet you in Annapolis.
Thanks, Pat
|
|
Re: [Amel Yacht Owners] Help winterize Amel SM 2000 in US
Pat,
I wrote an e-mail to your privat account sailw32@..., is it the right address, did you get it?
Oliver SV JoEmi SM 2000 No. 397
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Oliver, I live on the Sassafras River at the north end of the Bay. I just hauled my boat a few hours ago and will winterize it in the next few days. Is your water maker pickled ? Where is your boat located ?
Pat
SM Shenanigans
-----Original Message-----
From: qmvwv3fna4dth3r32bdwtz3bpy7meopg2s2xlnuq@... [amelyachtowners] < amelyachtowners@...>
To: amelyachtowners < amelyachtowners@...>
Sent: Thu, Nov 9, 2017 2:20 pm
Subject: [Amel Yacht Owners] Help winterize Amel SM 2000 in US
Hello,
and thank you for the answers to find a high quality rope for our boat.
We are looking for a very experienced AMEL SM 2000 owner or previous AMEL SM 2000 owner, who can help us to winterize our boat in the US, Chesapeake Bay.
Actually it seams difficult for us to fly in from Europe. We are in a Marina with a very good and experienced Boatyard, but like we all know, an AMEL owner knows the AMEL much better.
If someone could help us, or could recommend someone please contact us.
Oliver
SV JoEmi
SM 2000 No. 397
|
|
Re: [Amel Yacht Owners] Furling Gearbox Differences
What is the consensus of others, then, regarding using gear oil versus grease for the furlor and outhaul gearboxes? Indeed, it would seem that gear oil would be the appropriate lubrication, but I look to those smarter than me…
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
If you are going to disassemble the gearbox, why not just fill it with SAE90 oil? That will do a much better job of keeping the gears lubricated than grease. Grease tends to get thrown off gears as they turn and doesn't stay where the gears are meshed, which is what you really want to lubricate. Cheers Alan Elyse SM437 On the hard, raising the waterline
|
|
Re: [Amel Yacht Owners] Furling Gearbox Differences

Alan Leslie
If you are going to disassemble the gearbox, why not just fill it with SAE90 oil? That will do a much better job of keeping the gears lubricated than grease. Grease tends to get thrown off gears as they turn and doesn't stay where the gears are meshed, which is what you really want to lubricate. Cheers Alan Elyse SM437 On the hard, raising the waterline
|
|
Re: [Amel Yacht Owners] Furling Gearbox Differences
When drilling and tapping grease fitting holes on the gearboxes, are people doing so with the gearbox disassembled, or are you doing it blindly. If doing it blindly, how thick is the housing, and where are the fittings best placed?
Thanks
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Yes, Bill, as I said, "the plastic caps/plugs are fine". Perhaps as annoying is the failure of the finish, as some have pointed out. I recall Kent had some of his parts powder coated. Better yet, as Joel encourages, use that water maker and rinse off the seawater as often as possible. Cheers, Craig ---In amelyachtowners@..., wrote : Craig, et al,
I had a slight amount of dissimilar metal corrosion between the stainless steel grease fittings and the cast aluminum gearbox housing. Using plastic/nylon/delrin screws/bolts is a good idea if you want to keep it looking good.
|
|
Re: [Amel Yacht Owners] phased electronics replacement
Steve - I’d like to ask you about your planning for Panama. Perhaps you would be willing to pass along your personal contact. I am at jamescromie “at" yahoo “dot” com.
Hey Pat,
I was hoping you guys were going to make it South this season. At least the eastern Caribbean should be put back together by next year. We just got to Panama, and will spend the next couple of months mostly in the San Blas, prior to sorting our canal transit for February.
My experience with the interphase was good, but it was 15 years ago with an almost new unit. Aloha had one when we purchased her, but it had not worked for a while, and we ripped it out. I'm hoping Raymarine comes out with one, as I have all new Raymarine electronics I installed back in April, and am happy with all of it. After my recent experience, it seems like a more critical piece of equipment to have.
Aloha, Steve Steve, I had interphase and found it erratic . The B&G forward scan is much better and would definitely have shown a large rock or ledge. Another nice feature, even when not in the scan mode and without it displayed on the plotter , you have a green area displayed on the plotter in front of your boat that turns to yellow as the depth decreases and then turns red when you enter an area of dangerous depth , that you set up. Just looking at You Tube of the San Blas , looks beautiful , thinking of doing it next winter. Have Fun ! Pat SM Shenanigans
-----Original Message----- From: Stephen Davis flyboyscd@... [amelyachtowners] < amelyachtowners@...> To: amelyachtowners < amelyachtowners@...> Sent: Thu, Nov 9, 2017 12:25 pm Subject: Re: [Amel Yacht Owners] Re: phased electronics replacement My 2 cents worth...2 days ago we were slowly navigating down a remote uncharted bay in the less traveled Eastern San Blas of Panama. We were using the the Eric Bauhaus charts from "The Panama Cruisers Guide". His chart indicated 15 meters, and we were indicating 54' on the sounder just creeping along. We went from 54' to hitting something and coming to a rapid stop in the blink of an eye. We were able to back off, and immediately showed 54' again. The water was brown, and Liz was spotting on the bow with no indication that anything was ahead of us. Fortunately, we were going slow, and other than some scratches on the iron part of the keel, no harm done.
Moral of the story is a functional forward looking sonar may have prevented this, and giving me the confidence to continue instead of turning around as we did. I have used an old interphase unit many years ago in Hawaii, and even with the older technology, I found it very useful.
Regards,
Steve Davis Aloha SM 72 Puerto Lindo, Panama Pat,
I have not installed forward scanning sonar. At least, not yet.
It has been a quite a while since I last evaluated forward sonars, so my comments might be very out of date.... The ability to actually display something I felt I could easily interpret in real time at a useful level of precision didn't impress me. The times we bump bottom we are going from 6.9 feet to 6.5, not from 40 feet to 5 feet. I know some people swear by them, so there is utility there I am not seeing.
Double that on the power usage of the 3G radar! We routinely leave the radar on at sea now. One of the downsides people have listed about the broadband radars is that they are not as good at rain/squall detection. I don't see it. On our trip down here we wer e regularly seeing rather light squall activity well before the rain started to fall to the surface. For weather tracking and avoidance at sea, the 3G certainly meets my needs, even if it can't pick out a spot of drizzle at 20 miles!
It was good to meet you,
Bill Kinney SM160, Harmonie LMC, Fort Lauderdale, FL
---In amelyachtowners@..., wrote : Bill, Due to a lightning strike we had every instrument on the boat replaced from tv antenna to ssb , everything. I chose to go with all B&G , 12 inch plotter at the helm and a 9 in. at the nav . station. I opted for the Forward Scan , it seemed erratic , with the image of the bottom spiking up and down , while in an area with a flat bottom (Chesapeake Bay ) . I could place no faith in it to accurately depict what was in front of me. I installed a new transducer , as suggested by a B&G rep. , I have yet been able to test it out, and will be hauling the boat asap . My question, do you find the forward scan to accurately depict an image of the bottom , or is the image erratic , showing the bottom depth shoot up and down. I thought that perhaps the mud bottom we have here does not reflect well and maybe it works better in a sand / coral bottom . I also really like the radar and it uses very little power . It was nice to meet you in Annapolis.
Thanks, Pat
|
|
Re: [Amel Yacht Owners] Re: phased electronics replacement
Hey Pat,
I was hoping you guys were going to make it South this season. At least the eastern Caribbean should be put back together by next year. We just got to Panama, and will spend the next couple of months mostly in the San Blas, prior to sorting our canal transit for February.
My experience with the interphase was good, but it was 15 years ago with an almost new unit. Aloha had one when we purchased her, but it had not worked for a while, and we ripped it out. I'm hoping Raymarine comes out with one, as I have all new Raymarine electronics I installed back in April, and am happy with all of it. After my recent experience, it seems like a more critical piece of equipment to have.
Aloha, Steve
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
On Nov 9, 2017, at 17:15, Patrick Mcaneny sailw32@... [amelyachtowners] < amelyachtowners@...> wrote:
Steve, I had interphase and found it erratic . The B&G forward scan is much better and would definitely have shown a large rock or ledge. Another nice feature, even when not in the scan mode and without it displayed on the plotter , you have a green area displayed on the plotter in front of your boat that turns to yellow as the depth decreases and then turns red when you enter an area of dangerous depth , that you set up. Just looking at You Tube of the San Blas , looks beautiful , thinking of doing it next winter.
Have Fun !
Pat
SM Shenanigans
-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Davis flyboyscd@... [amelyachtowners] < amelyachtowners@...>
To: amelyachtowners < amelyachtowners@...>
Sent: Thu, Nov 9, 2017 12:25 pm
Subject: Re: [Amel Yacht Owners] Re: phased electronics replacement
My 2 cents worth...2 days ago we were slowly navigating down a remote uncharted bay in the less traveled Eastern San Blas of Panama. We were using the the Eric Bauhaus charts from "The Panama Cruisers Guide". His chart indicated 15 meters, and we were indicating 54' on the sounder just creeping along. We went from 54' to hitting something and coming to a rapid stop in the blink of an eye. We were able to back off, and immediately showed 54' again. The water was brown, and Liz was spotting on the bow with no indication that anything was ahead of us. Fortunately, we were going slow, and other than some scratches on the iron part of the keel, no harm done.
Moral of the story is a functional forward looking sonar may have prevented this, and giving me the confidence to continue instead of turning around as we did. I have used an old interphase unit many years ago in Hawaii, and even with the older technology, I found it very
useful.
Regards,
Steve Davis
Aloha SM 72
Puerto Lindo, Panama
Pat,
I have not installed forward scanning sonar. At least, not yet.
It has been a quite a while since I last evaluated forward sonars, so my comments might be very out of date.... The ability to actually display something I felt I could easily interpret in real time at a useful level of precision didn't impress me. The times we bump bottom we are going from 6.9 feet to 6.5, not from 40 feet to 5 feet. I know some people swear by them, so there is utility there I am not seeing.
Double that on the power usage of the 3G radar! We routinely leave the radar on at sea now. One of the downsides people have listed about the broadband radars is that they are not as good at rain/squall detection. I don't see it. On our trip down here we wer
e regularly seeing rather light squall activity well before the rain started to fall to the surface. For weather tracking and avoidance at sea, the 3G certainly meets my needs, even if it can't pick out a spot of drizzle at 20 miles!
It was good to meet you,
Bill Kinney
SM160, Harmonie
LMC, Fort Lauderdale, FL
---In amelyachtowners@..., wrote :
Bill, Due to a lightning strike we had every instrument on the boat replaced from tv antenna to ssb , everything. I chose to go with all B&G , 12 inch plotter at the helm and a 9 in. at the nav . station. I opted for the Forward Scan , it seemed erratic , with the image of the bottom spiking up
and down , while in an area with a flat bottom (Chesapeake Bay ) . I could place no faith in it to accurately depict what was in front of me. I installed a new transducer , as suggested by a B&G rep. , I have yet been able to test it out, and will be hauling the boat asap . My question, do you find the forward scan to accurately depict an image of the bottom , or is the image erratic , showing the bottom depth shoot up and down. I thought that perhaps the mud bottom we have here does not reflect well and maybe it works better in a sand / coral bottom . I also really like the radar and it uses very little power . It was nice to meet you in Annapolis.
Thanks,
Pat
|
|
Re: [Amel Yacht Owners] Re: leech length on mizzen ballooner on 54
|
|
Re: phased electronics replacement

Dominique Guenot
Hello Bill,
Thank you for all these information and the schematic.
I see you have a computer AC42 at the navigation table. What are you using it for?
Are you plotting your route on it or on the Zeus at the Helm or both? Do you have 1 set of charts or 2 different sets of charts?
Thank you in advance
Dominique s/v Viva currently in Fiji
|
|
Re: Problems hooking up new Bamar EJF 1.0 to new Boxtron E14s Any help
Porter, I am sorry for the delay in responding. I did replace my Boxtron controllers with the new E14, and I had to figure it out myself. I still have the older belt drive furlers that are working fine, so I can not be certain about the new furlers, but the E14 is likely the same. What I found by studying the wiring diagrams is that the original design of the switches at the helm, for turning on the Boxtron controllers, provides 24 volt power to the Boxtron. The new E14 does not need power, you just need to make contact between two terminals. I am not currently on the boat, so I can not tell you the terminal numbers, but it should be apparent when you look at the box, or at the wiring diagram. I do remember that there are three terminals in the E14, the center one, and two adjacent ones. shorting (or connecting) the center to either side runs the unit one direction and the other. To solve the problem, I installed a small relay right inside the E14. (or maybe it was 2 relays) I had spares on board of the little relays that are used in the bow thruster up/down circuit. I connected the 24v power from the helm switch to close the relay, and connected the E14 terminals to the contacts of the relay. It was a simple fix and if you are using an experienced marine electrician he should of been able to sort that for you. I will be back aboard Gallivant next week, and could provide you with more detailed info if needed. Bob Hodgins Gallivant Amel 54 #31
|
|
Re: [Amel Yacht Owners] Re: phased electronics replacement [1 Attachment]
Once again, I made the mistake of assuming all SMs are the same, even though I know better!
The Furuo 1831 that we had could not send radar data out... Newer Furuno radars of course can talk to chart plotters....
Bill Kinney SM160, Harmonie LMC, Fort Lauderdale, FL
|
|
Re: [Amel Yacht Owners] Re: phased electronics replacement
Steve, I had interphase and found it erratic . The B&G forward scan is much better and would definitely have shown a large rock or ledge. Another nice feature, even when not in the scan mode and without it displayed on the plotter , you have a green area displayed on the plotter in front of your boat that turns to yellow as the depth decreases and then turns red when you enter an area of dangerous depth , that you set up. Just looking at You Tube of the San Blas , looks beautiful , thinking of doing it next winter.
Have Fun !
Pat
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Davis flyboyscd@... [amelyachtowners]
To: amelyachtowners
Sent: Thu, Nov 9, 2017 12:25 pm
Subject: Re: [Amel Yacht Owners] Re: phased electronics replacement
My 2 cents worth...2 days ago we were slowly navigating down a remote uncharted bay in the less traveled Eastern San Blas of Panama. We were using the the Eric Bauhaus charts from "The Panama Cruisers Guide". His chart indicated 15 meters, and we were indicating 54' on the sounder just creeping along. We went from 54' to hitting something and coming to a rapid stop in the blink of an eye. We were able to back off, and immediately showed 54' again. The water was brown, and Liz was spotting on the bow with no indication that anything was ahead of us. Fortunately, we were going slow, and other than some scratches on the iron part of the keel, no harm done.
Moral of the story is a functional forward looking sonar may have prevented this, and giving me the confidence to continue instead of turning around as we did. I have used an old interphase unit many years ago in Hawaii, and even with the older technology, I found it very
useful.
Regards,
Steve Davis
Aloha SM 72
Puerto Lindo, Panama
Pat,
I have not installed forward scanning sonar. At least, not yet.
It has been a quite a while since I last evaluated forward sonars, so my comments might be very out of date.... The ability to actually display something I felt I could easily interpret in real time at a useful level of precision didn't impress me. The times we bump bottom we are going from 6.9 feet to 6.5, not from 40 feet to 5 feet. I know some people swear by them, so there is utility there I am not seeing.
Double that on the power usage of the 3G radar! We routinely leave the radar on at sea now. One of the downsides people have listed about the broadband radars is that they are not as good at rain/squall detection. I don't see it. On our trip down here we wer
e regularly seeing rather light squall activity well before the rain started to fall to the surface. For weather tracking and avoidance at sea, the 3G certainly meets my needs, even if it can't pick out a spot of drizzle at 20 miles!
It was good to meet you,
Bill Kinney
SM160, Harmonie
LMC, Fort Lauderdale, FL
---In amelyachtowners@..., wrote :
Bill, Due to a lightning strike we had every instrument on the boat replaced from tv antenna to ssb , everything. I chose to go with all B&G , 12 inch plotter at the helm and a 9 in. at the nav . station. I opted for the Forward Scan , it seemed erratic , with the image of the bottom spiking up
and down , while in an area with a flat bottom (Chesapeake Bay ) . I could place no faith in it to accurately depict what was in front of me. I installed a new transducer , as suggested by a B&G rep. , I have yet been able to test it out, and will be hauling the boat asap . My question, do you find the forward scan to accurately depict an image of the bottom , or is the image erratic , showing the bottom depth shoot up and down. I thought that perhaps the mud bottom we have here does not reflect well and maybe it works better in a sand / coral bottom . I also really like the radar and it uses very little power . It was nice to meet you in Annapolis.
Thanks,
Pat
|
|
Re: [Amel Yacht Owners] Help winterize Amel SM 2000 in US
Oliver, I live on the Sassafras River at the north end of the Bay. I just hauled my boat a few hours ago and will winterize it in the next few days. Is your water maker pickled ? Where is your boat located ?
Pat
SM Shenanigans
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
-----Original Message-----
From: qmvwv3fna4dth3r32bdwtz3bpy7meopg2s2xlnuq@... [amelyachtowners]
To: amelyachtowners
Sent: Thu, Nov 9, 2017 2:20 pm
Subject: [Amel Yacht Owners] Help winterize Amel SM 2000 in US
Hello,
and thank you for the answers to find a high quality rope for our boat.
We are looking for a very experienced AMEL SM 2000 owner or previous AMEL SM 2000 owner, who can help us to winterize our boat in the US, Chesapeake Bay.
Actually it seams difficult for us to fly in from Europe. We are in a Marina with a very good and experienced Boatyard, but like we all know, an AMEL owner knows the AMEL much better.
If someone could help us, or could recommend someone please contact us.
Oliver
SV JoEmi
SM 2000 No. 397
|
|
Re: [Amel Yacht Owners] Re: leech length on mizzen ballooner on 54
Bill & Judy Rouse <yahoogroups@...>
Jeff,
Wolfgang gave you the number. I mistakenly said leech when I should have said luff. Wolfgang has the luff at 11,65m. 12.0 meter is perfect for your sock.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 8:04 PM, webercardio@... [amelyachtowners] <amelyachtowners@...> wrote:
Jeff the Mizzen ballooner is 12,6 meter x 11,65 meter x 6,0 meter. I have a " Black Box Bergeschlauch" from Quatumsails - length 11,8 m , paid 385 ,-€ . The system works fine
Good sailing to all. Wolfgang Weber SY ELISE Amel 54 # 162 ( marina di Ragusa /Sicily ) next week in Florida
|
|
Re: [Amel Yacht Owners] Re: phased electronics replacement
Hi Heinz, speed of reply relates to time zones. You got me at my computer. When I see my tech I will ask him about that connecting equipment. Regards Danny SM 299 Ocean Pearl
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
On 10 November 2017 at 09:16 "Heinz Stutenbäumer heinz@... [amelyachtowners]" <amelyachtowners@...> wrote:
Hallo Danny Thanks for the quick answer. I know a good eclectic on Martinique. If I still need help, I will gladly contact you again. Heinz Von: amelyachtowners@... [mailto:amelyachtowners@...] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 9. November 2017 21:05 An: amelyachtowners@... Betreff: Re: AW: AW: [Amel Yacht Owners] Re: phased electronics replacement Hi Heinz, Sorry, wiser heads than mine set it up. When we bought the boat they were supposed to be linked, and were but not functioning. The broker seemed aware of this and had an experienced captain on the sea trials and he sorted it out. The problem was the "names". You had to have the right "name" entered in both units, so the units could recognise each other and grant permission to link to the name. I remember that he had to alter the name of one or the other and then it was good. Clearly that is a key. The other thing is there is an item between the two which is driven by 120v so I have to have my 120v inverter on for the link to function. I had a new radar installed and the fitter could't understand why this was done but he left it as is saying, its working lets not mess with that. He could not see why 12 v couldn't be used. I am many things but an electronics expert I am not. If you want me to I could talk to him to get more information. He has retired now but he lives locally. To add to the conversation we have, and have had for all our ownership, a full range of Raymarine ST 60+ instruments and auto helm. They do all we want, Regards Danny SM 299 Ocean Pearl On 10 November 2017 at 07:58 "Heinz Stutenbäumer heinz@... [amelyachtowners]" <amelyachtowners@...> wrote:
Hi Dany It's nice to hear from someone who can connect the old Furono radar to a plotter. Do you have sketches or photos of how you connected it? Thank you Heinz Von: amelyachtowners@... [mailto:amelyachtowners@...] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 9. November 2017 18:55 An: amelyachtowners@... Betreff: Re: AW: [Amel Yacht Owners] Re: phased electronics replacement Hi, We have a Furuno radar at the nav station. It is linked to the Furuno plotter at the helm and can display in various modes there. Full screen, split screen and over lay. Works well. When doing crossings we have it on split screen at night. Regards Danny SM 299 Ocean Pearl On 09 November 2017 at 15:16 "greatketch@... [amelyachtowners]" <amelyachtowners@...> wrote:
We kept our original AutoHelm autopilot as an installed working back up to our newer, smarter B&G autopilot. The Autohelm has its own electronic compass, and receives wind data in the same way as it originally did, from the Hydra 0183 output. It does not receive GPS data, but I never tried to interface it in that way since I never ask my auto pilot to steer a GPS course. In other words, while it works together with the other instruments, it would not be fair to say it was integrated with them. The Furuno radar can not send radar data to any other device. It can, in theory, receive some data on heading and waypoints over 0183 but it requires an obsolete connector that I could never find. I have attached a schematic of the new things that have been added to our boat. The original wiring isn't completely shown, even if it is still being used. Just haven't had time to do that too! ---In amelyachtowners@..., <heinz@...> wrote : Hi Bill and all, I am relatively new to the group and have been a proud owner of a SM 2000 for about a year now. I'm up to do something similar with my SY Quetzal. I want to install new instruments and I will install a forward scan. I'd be interested to see if I could join the old autopilot. Also a connection to the ld and good working Furono Radar would inspire me. Are there any pictures you could send to me? I'd be grateful for any information. Also from other participants of the group. I fly to Martinique on the 18th and will then start work and do some Fotos. Thank you for every letter, and forgive my poor English Always fare winds. Heinz Stutenbäumer Quetzal SM 2000 No. 292 heinz@...
|
|
Re: [Amel Yacht Owners] Re: phased electronics replacement
Hallo Danny Thanks for the quick answer. I know a good eclectic on Martinique. If I still need help, I will gladly contact you again. Heinz Von: amelyachtowners@... [mailto:amelyachtowners@...] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 9. November 2017 21:05 An: amelyachtowners@... Betreff: Re: AW: AW: [Amel Yacht Owners] Re: phased electronics replacement Hi Heinz, Sorry, wiser heads than mine set it up. When we bought the boat they were supposed to be linked, and were but not functioning. The broker seemed aware of this and had an experienced captain on the sea trials and he sorted it out. The problem was the "names". You had to have the right "name" entered in both units, so the units could recognise each other and grant permission to link to the name. I remember that he had to alter the name of one or the other and then it was good. Clearly that is a key. The other thing is there is an item between the two which is driven by 120v so I have to have my 120v inverter on for the link to function. I had a new radar installed and the fitter could't understand why this was done but he left it as is saying, its working lets not mess with that. He could not see why 12 v couldn't be used. I am many things but an electronics expert I am not. If you want me to I could talk to him to get more information. He has retired now but he lives locally. To add to the conversation we have, and have had for all our ownership, a full range of Raymarine ST 60+ instruments and auto helm. They do all we want, Regards Danny SM 299 Ocean Pearl
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
On 10 November 2017 at 07:58 "Heinz Stutenbäumer heinz@... [amelyachtowners]" wrote:
Hi Dany It's nice to hear from someone who can connect the old Furono radar to a plotter. Do you have sketches or photos of how you connected it? Thank you Heinz Von: amelyachtowners@... [mailto:amelyachtowners@...] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 9. November 2017 18:55 An: amelyachtowners@... Betreff: Re: AW: [Amel Yacht Owners] Re: phased electronics replacement Hi, We have a Furuno radar at the nav station. It is linked to the Furuno plotter at the helm and can display in various modes there. Full screen, split screen and over lay. Works well. When doing crossings we have it on split screen at night. Regards Danny SM 299 Ocean Pearl On 09 November 2017 at 15:16 "greatketch@... [amelyachtowners]" wrote:
We kept our original AutoHelm autopilot as an installed working back up to our newer, smarter B&G autopilot. The Autohelm has its own electronic compass, and receives wind data in the same way as it originally did, from the Hydra 0183 output. It does not receive GPS data, but I never tried to interface it in that way since I never ask my auto pilot to steer a GPS course. In other words, while it works together with the other instruments, it would not be fair to say it was integrated with them. The Furuno radar can not send radar data to any other device. It can, in theory, receive some data on heading and waypoints over 0183 but it requires an obsolete connector that I could never find. I have attached a schematic of the new things that have been added to our boat. The original wiring isn't completely shown, even if it is still being used. Just haven't had time to do that too! ---In amelyachtowners@..., wrote : Hi Bill and all, I am relatively new to the group and have been a proud owner of a SM 2000 for about a year now. I'm up to do something similar with my SY Quetzal. I want to install new instruments and I will install a forward scan. I'd be interested to see if I could join the old autopilot. Also a connection to the ld and good working Furono Radar would inspire me. Are there any pictures you could send to me? I'd be grateful for any information. Also from other participants of the group. I fly to Martinique on the 18th and will then start work and do some Fotos. Thank you for every letter, and forgive my poor English Always fare winds. Heinz Stutenbäumer Quetzal SM 2000 No. 292 heinz@...
|
|
Re: [Amel Yacht Owners] Re: phased electronics replacement
Hi Heinz, Sorry, wiser heads than mine set it up. When we bought the boat they were supposed to be linked, and were but not functioning. The broker seemed aware of this and had an experienced captain on the sea trials and he sorted it out. The problem was the "names". You had to have the right "name" entered in both units, so the units could recognise each other and grant permission to link to the name. I remember that he had to alter the name of one or the other and then it was good. Clearly that is a key. The other thing is there is an item between the two which is driven by 120v so I have to have my 120v inverter on for the link to function. I had a new radar installed and the fitter could't understand why this was done but he left it as is saying, its working lets not mess with that. He could not see why 12 v couldn't be used. I am many things but an electronics expert I am not. If you want me to I could talk to him to get more information. He has retired now but he lives locally. To add to the conversation we have, and have had for all our ownership, a full range of Raymarine ST 60+ instruments and auto helm. They do all we want, Regards Danny SM 299 Ocean Pearl
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
On 10 November 2017 at 07:58 "Heinz Stutenbäumer heinz@... [amelyachtowners]" <amelyachtowners@...> wrote:
Hi Dany It's nice to hear from someone who can connect the old Furono radar to a plotter. Do you have sketches or photos of how you connected it? Thank you Heinz Von: amelyachtowners@... [mailto:amelyachtowners@...] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 9. November 2017 18:55 An: amelyachtowners@... Betreff: Re: AW: [Amel Yacht Owners] Re: phased electronics replacement Hi, We have a Furuno radar at the nav station. It is linked to the Furuno plotter at the helm and can display in various modes there. Full screen, split screen and over lay. Works well. When doing crossings we have it on split screen at night. Regards Danny SM 299 Ocean Pearl On 09 November 2017 at 15:16 "greatketch@... [amelyachtowners]" <amelyachtowners@...> wrote:
We kept our original AutoHelm autopilot as an installed working back up to our newer, smarter B&G autopilot. The Autohelm has its own electronic compass, and receives wind data in the same way as it originally did, from the Hydra 0183 output. It does not receive GPS data, but I never tried to interface it in that way since I never ask my auto pilot to steer a GPS course. In other words, while it works together with the other instruments, it would not be fair to say it was integrated with them. The Furuno radar can not send radar data to any other device. It can, in theory, receive some data on heading and waypoints over 0183 but it requires an obsolete connector that I could never find. I have attached a schematic of the new things that have been added to our boat. The original wiring isn't completely shown, even if it is still being used. Just haven't had time to do that too! ---In amelyachtowners@..., <heinz@...> wrote : Hi Bill and all, I am relatively new to the group and have been a proud owner of a SM 2000 for about a year now. I'm up to do something similar with my SY Quetzal. I want to install new instruments and I will install a forward scan. I'd be interested to see if I could join the old autopilot. Also a connection to the ld and good working Furono Radar would inspire me. Are there any pictures you could send to me? I'd be grateful for any information. Also from other participants of the group. I fly to Martinique on the 18th and will then start work and do some Fotos. Thank you for every letter, and forgive my poor English Always fare winds. Heinz Stutenbäumer Quetzal SM 2000 No. 292 heinz@...
|
|
Help winterize Amel SM 2000 in US
qmvwv3fna4dth3r32bdwtz3bpy7meopg2s2xlnuq@...
Hello,
and thank you for the answers to find a high quality rope for our boat.
We are looking for a very experienced AMEL SM 2000 owner or previous AMEL SM 2000 owner, who can help us to winterize our boat in the US, Chesapeake Bay. Actually it seams difficult for us to fly in from Europe. We are in a Marina with a very good and experienced Boatyard, but like we all know, an AMEL owner knows the AMEL much better.
If someone could help us, or could recommend someone please contact us.
Oliver SV JoEmi SM 2000 No. 397
|
|