Re: SM 2000 autopilot
Rob Smith
Thank you Germain
On Mon, 23 Nov 2020, 08:26 Germain Jean-Pierre, <jp.germain45@...> wrote:
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Re: Lithium Batteries under Consideration
Scott SV Tengah
Michael, I am not sure if they are worse. Given that Jamie was getting below 24 volts overnight after only a year, that sounds pretty bad though. Even our old gel batteries weren't that bad. My concern with Firefly was that the sales pitch was that you could run them down to low SOC without damaging the battery, but if the voltage sags so much, the batteries may not get damaged, but your boat will not like the low voltage. Therefore the ability to take it to low SOC is only academic.
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 10:48 AM michael winand via groups.io <mfw642000=yahoo.com.au@groups.io> wrote: Hi Scott, would you suggest that the firefly batteries are worse than other lead batteries regarding their voltage drop curve?
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Re: Lithium Batteries under Consideration
Bill Kinney, maybe you could also 'chime in' regarding Firefly batteries. Are you still happy with them after 2-3 years?
Dean SV Stella A54-154
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Re: Silicone BT seals
eric freedman
I usually keep the anchor untied until we get to sea. You never know when the stuff hits the fan. Fair Winds Eric Amel Super Maramu #376
From: main@AmelYachtOwners.groups.io [mailto:main@AmelYachtOwners.groups.io] On Behalf Of Barry Connor via groups.io
Sent: Saturday, November 07, 2020 6:47 AM To: main@amelyachtowners.groups.io Subject: Re: [AmelYachtOwners] Silicone BT seals
Hi, this was on our 2006 Amel 54 when we bought in 2015. We thought it was a standard attached by Amel at build. Was very helpful when we first sailed but we do more checks now.
Barry and Penny “SV Lady Penelope II” Amel 54. #17 Sainte Anne anchorage Martinique On Nov 6, 2020, at 20:33, William O'Toole <william@...> wrote:
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Dessalator 230v 160 LPH watermaker fault I had the same problem and finally found the fault
eric freedman
From the time of delivery of Kimberlite I had a similar problem. I attributed it to many things. I finally found the problem. In the AC panel there is a bus bar that connects all the circuit breakers. There is a small fitting that sits on the bus bar and connects to the circuit breaker. It is held on to the bus bar by tension. Upon careful examination I found that the fitting for the watermaker which connected to the breaker was loose on the bus bar. I removed it. It was corroded due to heat of a bad connection. I carefully filed it with a jewelers file. I then re-tensioned the fitting and installed it. My watermaker finally runs for hours with no further faults. Fair Winds Eric Amel Super Maramu #376
From: main@AmelYachtOwners.groups.io [mailto:main@AmelYachtOwners.groups.io] On Behalf Of Mohammad Shirloo
Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2020 12:01 PM To: main@AmelYachtOwners.groups.io Subject: Re: [AmelYachtOwners] Dessalator 230v 160 LPH watermaker fault
Hello Dan;
We have the same water maker aboard Kokomo. However, I’m not sure if it is the same or a later design. Going through your procedure, I have one recommendation. I see that you state that you increase the high pressure until you are just below the green zone on your HP gauge. The system will go into a fault status and stop, if the pressure does not pass a certain threshold within a certain amount of time after the HP pump kicks on. I do not know what these thresholds are or how they are measured. Also, in talking to Dessalator support, Martin Dee Jong, on several issues over the years, he has always recommended to keep the pressure of the HP pump on the high side of green, just shy of the red zone. He stated the reasoning as the unit is very capable of handling this pressure setting 24x7x365 and there is no reason to lower the pressure and reduce the amount if water being produced. We have followed this advice for the past 5 years and currently have over 600 hours on our original 11 year old membranes that still put out water in the 250 PPM range. As a side note, he also stated that there’s no need to back flush, as long as you are producing water at least once a week, which we always do, when on board.
I would recommend trying to increase the HP pump setting in the mid to upper range of the green zone. It may be that the sensitivity of the sensors that gauge the pressure and time may have changed over time.
Happy Sailing;
Mohammad and Aty B&B Kokomo AMEL 54 #099
From: main@AmelYachtOwners.groups.io <main@AmelYachtOwners.groups.io> On Behalf Of Dan Carlson via groups.io
Good morning all, On sv BeBe, SM#387, I have the original Dessalator 230v 160LPH water-maker.
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
HATCH DOOR REPAIR WITHOUT REMOVING THE HATCH
eric freedman
This is how I did it on Kimberlite.
I felt it was not necessary to replace the veneer where it cannot be seen. I just raised the door to its maximum height and removed the old veneer. Quite simple but takes a bit of time. Fair Winds Eric Amel Super Maramu #376
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Re: Lithium Batteries under Consideration
Jamie Wendell
Dean, I too have that issue, but the solution is to keep the fuel tank full. Maybe some lead bars behind the lithiums will do the trick?
I hope I did not cause anyone to second guess their own battery solutions, as everyone will have a different need, but I had to report my results as they are. Jamie Phantom, A54 #44
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Re: Lithium Batteries under Consideration
Well that bursts the bubble of having batteries that are more capable than AGM at lower SOC for half the price of LFP AND don't cause the A54 to list more to port.
I can't believe my thought pattern at the moment, but if I could buy Lithium batteries that were as heavy as AGM's then my change to Lithium would be a fait-accompli. I just don't like the thought of the boat listing even more to port! Dean SV Stella A54-154
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Re: Lithium Batteries under Consideration
Jamie Wendell
Well I guess I should chime in here, so to speak. I installed Fireflys in my A54 a few years ago. They lasted about 3 years before the voltage drop started to cause problems for me. They were promoted as being "almost" as good as Lithiums for about half the price, so I thought why not.
I cannot say why they failed, but as we were yanking them out of the boat, we load tested all of them just to see how they had held up, thinking maybe 1 or 2 had simply died. Almost all of them showed significant degradation. I was able to salvage a couple of them to serve as starter batteries, but I was not a happy camper. I do have a very heavy electrical load. Perhaps the 12-volt in series configuration is not compatible unless you deliberately balance them out periodically. With 24-volt Lithiums, that is no longer a concern. Despite the expense (2 times the Firefly technology), I am convinced that LiFePO4 is the way to go if you are looking for long-term serviceability. They hold their voltage levels even with extended bow thruster use, and I never get low-voltage alarms on my Maretron N2K bus any more. I used to get them all the time after the first year and had to wake up in the mornings to start the generator to quell the alarm. I had the alarm set to go off if the voltage dropped below 24 volts. Sorry to put a bummer into the carbon-foam technology, as some may have had a good experience given the "better mousetrap approach," but they still are based on lead construction. I expect in the future LiFePO4 or some derivative will become the norm for our Amels. Jamie Phantom, A54 #44
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Re: Lithium Batteries under Consideration
Hi Scott, would you suggest that the firefly batteries are worse than other lead batteries regarding their voltage drop curve?
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I would think that the state of change would have been important to know.
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Re: Lithium Batteries under Consideration
Scott SV Tengah
Arno,
I think it would be best if Jamie could chime in. He replaced his Fireflies precisely because he experienced severe voltage drop under load, one of the "hidden" downsides of carbon foam. As always, there could have been other confounding factors. That said, I would be careful trusting specs. The Victron Battery Protect should have worked fine on my system but instead melted within a day. Regarding gen usage during BT, I spent about a year diagnosing and fixing my BT, so learned a bit more than I ever wanted to know. My understanding is an Amel54 owner experienced a solenoid that melted closed because ohm's law tells us that when voltage drops, amps have to increase to compensate. That owner spun like a top in the marina. That's why Amel suggested that I install an emergency stop switch. My understanding is that repeated use (think 30 knots on the beam in a tricky marina) will result in cumulative voltage drops so the genset/charger is supposed to help the batteries recover a bit between uses, not replace the batteries. I considered carbon foam as a cheaper, easier upgrade than lifepo4, but decided against them for the voltage drop issues. If you look at the firely SOC vs. voltage curves, you will see that the main benefit of being able to deeply discharge and also not fully recharge is negated by the fact that voltage drops to unacceptable levels at low SOC. Here's another guy who took the baby step and then ended up going all the way. That said, I understand your use case is primarily marina life, so in your case, I would not get lithium either. Just wanted to make the info available to people who live full time off the grid who think Fireflies are lithium like: https://www.cruisersforum.com/forums/f14/firefly-oasis-voltage-sag-225444.html#post3002627 Perhaps you will have better success with respect to voltage drops than others who have tried. -- Scott 2007 A54 #69 SV Tengah http://www.svtengah.com
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Re: Amel original hard antifouling?
Scott, I don't believe anyone can answer that except the person who owned her when it was applied. Possibly it is pealing because a primer was required between the new and the old. I gave you my experience which was Micron 66 on top of Micron 66, but the top layer had been seriously thinned during the application. Good luck! Bill
On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 11:40 PM Scott SV Tengah <Scott.nguyen@...> wrote: Bill,
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Re: A few questions while on the hard... SM23
Patrick McAneny
Mike, My boat is on the hard as well and I just filled the sonic hole with epoxy filler yesterday . I am not aware of any service required on the rudder hinges. You need to remove the third oil seal, there are many posts in the archives covering the installation of the oil seals . You should probably have a long look at the files and photos sections on the Amel site ,every subject concerning servicing every part of the SM has been covered ,and will answer many of your questions. If not never hesitate to ask to group, there is hundreds of very knowledgeable owners more than willing to help you solve any issue you may have.
Good Luck,
Pat
SM Shenanigans #123
-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Longcor (SV Trilogy) <svtrilogy53@...> To: main@AmelYachtOwners.groups.io Sent: Sun, Nov 22, 2020 7:16 pm Subject: [AmelYachtOwners] A few questions while on the hard... SM23 Hello everyone! Our 1990 SM#23 is on the hard and we are tackling some maintenance items for the first time. Naturally, a few questions have come up that I would like to ask the group.
1. Does the rudder hinge require any service or greasing while hauled out? There are two stainless screws on the middle hinge, anything to do there or just make sure they are tight?
2. I removed the plug on the sonic speed transducer on the keel. It revealed what looks like a crack right above the transducer (photo attached). Should this whole void just get epoxy filled? The sonic speed is not working and we have no intention of getting it working. No water is making it into the hull as far as I can tell.
3. We are servicing the C-drive shaft seals and wear bushing for the first time since taking ownership. After removing the bushing and two seals, we find a third, smaller seal that is very deep and perhaps sealed in place. This is the older aluminum C-drive unit, but I'm not sure this seal placement is Amel original. Has anyone else with an older SM seen this? Any advice or suggestions? I was under the impression I should be able to look into the C-drive after removing the wear bushing and the seals that ride on it.
Cheers,
Mike Longcor
SV Trilogy SM#23
Opua, NZ
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Re: Lithium Batteries under Consideration
Hi Scott,
According to the specs the CCA for the Firefly is 720 Amp. So the BT should be fine having 5*720=3600 startup amps available. I don’t buy this generator story as your 100 amp battery charger cannot respond quick enough for the solenoid to make a difference. And besides it can only supply 100 amp where the startup current for the BT is probably closer to 1000 amp. When running the BT takes about 450 Amp,, about 80 amp per battery. If your batteries cannot supply that, you need to replace them anyway... Cheers, Arno SV Luna A54-121
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Re: SM 2000 autopilot
Germain Jean-Pierre
Hi Rob,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Disregard the mess... tiny leak now fixed. Start with a ss base plate with the bolts welded onto it as per the hydraulic ram base plate. Epoxy the plate to the hull; build up grp layers as shown. Remove the bell rank and design a lower L shape lip Attach the business end of the ram. Install the pump somewhere convenient Sorry for the delay Jean-Pierre Germain, Eleuthera, SM007, NZ
On 20/11/2020, at 10:40 AM, Rob Smith <robfromcornwall.1966@...> wrote:
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Re: Lithium Batteries under Consideration
Scott SV Tengah
To continue the thread drift 😇, perhaps Jamie on phantom can chime in about his experience with carbon foam.
He had fireflies before I think and experienced severe voltage drops under load to the point where his fridges started failing. I'd be a bit concerned about using the bow thruster with a battery that experienced severe voltage drop under load. I guess you could just run the generator when using the bt as amel recommended to avoid melting your solenoids. -- Scott 2007 A54 #69 SV Tengah http://www.svtengah.com
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Re: Amel original hard antifouling?
Scott SV Tengah
Bill,
I guess I should have been more clear with my original question. I already have micron antifoul on hand but it seems the existing paint is peeling back to what appears to be a hard antifoul. As such I want to get some idea of what this hard antifoul might be to make sure it's compatible. -- Scott 2007 A54 #69 SV Tengah http://www.svtengah.com
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
A few questions while on the hard... SM23
Mike Longcor (SV Trilogy)
Hello everyone! Our 1990 SM#23 is on the hard and we are tackling some maintenance items for the first time. Naturally, a few questions have come up that I would like to ask the group.
1. Does the rudder hinge require any service or greasing while hauled out? There are two stainless screws on the middle hinge, anything to do there or just make sure they are tight?
2. I removed the plug on the sonic speed transducer on the keel. It revealed what looks like a crack right above the transducer (photo attached). Should this whole void just get epoxy filled? The sonic speed is not working and we have no intention of getting it working. No water is making it into the hull as far as I can tell.
3. We are servicing the C-drive shaft seals and wear bushing for the first time since taking ownership. After removing the bushing and two seals, we find a third, smaller seal that is very deep and perhaps sealed in place. This is the older aluminum C-drive unit, but I'm not sure this seal placement is Amel original. Has anyone else with an older SM seen this? Any advice or suggestions? I was under the impression I should be able to look into the C-drive after removing the wear bushing and the seals that ride on it.
Cheers,
Mike Longcor
SV Trilogy SM#23
Opua, NZ
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Re: Lithium Batteries under Consideration
Hi Randall,
I'm not exactly sure but I think the current price-point is around USD 400 each and you would need 10 in total to get similar capacity as for 12 AGMs. The weight of these batteries is slightly higher so putting in 12 may give problems with the boat listing to starboard. As the usable capacity per battery is higher then for AGM, I will order 10 pieces to replace my failing AGM set. I'm also planning to replace the starter battery with one of these batteries as a sort of spare battery. In case one fails I have a spare as starter batteries are much more easy to obtain. So in total I'm ordering 11 pieces. Regards, Arno Luijten
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Re: Replacing standing rigging - advice for other jobs?
Mark McGovern
Trey,
Congratulations on the purchase and welcome to the Amel cult family! I'm replacing my rigging this winter as well and I am strongly considering taking the masts down to replace it so I have been giving this topic some thought. Things I'm considering doing include:
-- Mark McGovern SM #440 Cara Deale, MD USA
|
|||||||||||
|