Silicone Seals for Bowthruster on SM
I know this is a well covered topic, but where exactly can the silicone bowthruster seals be purchased?
Many thanks George , # 434
|
|
Re: Firefly batteries
I installed Fireflys on my previous boat.
many of the benefits of Lithium, except the weight. They will also charge using your conventional chargers. I was pleased. I replaced a 600 amp hour, standard AGM house bank with 348 amp hour Fireflys and didn’t notice any reduction in usage, as you can discharge them deeper than conventional lead acid without damage. today’s concern is that I can now find Lithium for similar prices as Firefly.
|
|
Re: Firefly batteries
Paul Dowd and Sharon Brown
Hi Bill,
When you say this:
All the batteries on the 0 to 12 volt side are tied together. Likewise, all of them on the 12 to 24 volt side
Do you mean that the low side batteries of each 24v pair are all connected together with all their negative terminals, and similarly the high side?
Another possible hitch is that I’ve been told by a UK supplier that FF recommends no more than four pairs, but I believe you mentioned that a 54 would normally take 12. Would you know anything about this? It is the G31s I’m talking about.
Hi Arno,
You say that 12 batteries would not fit. I note you have hull 121 and wonder if Amel may have resized the compartment in the interim from #98? According to my measurements on record it will be 2mm short on the width but assume some inaccuracy in this measurement.
Cheers, Paul
Paul Dowd & Sharon Brown S/Y Ya Fohi, Amel 54 #98 skype: pauldowd
From: main@AmelYachtOwners.groups.io <main@AmelYachtOwners.groups.io> On Behalf Of Bill Kinney
Sent: 08 October 2021 14:54 To: main@AmelYachtOwners.groups.io Subject: Re: [AmelYachtOwners] Firefly batteries
Paul, -- Cheers Paul Ya Fohi - Amel 54 #98
|
|
Re: Firefly batteries
Hi Paul,
Be careful with the size of the Firefly batteries. I did not manage to get 12 batteries in the cavity. I’m not sure how many I now have as I’m not close to the boat but I do know these batteries are slightly bigger then the size Amel used initially. The Firefly’s are 120Ah and the default Amels were 105Ah. The batteries perform well for me however I do find the voltage to be a bit lower then AGM at the same state of charge. Cheers, Arno Luijten SV Luna, A54-121
|
|
Re: Air con circulating pump
Stefan Schaufert
Thanks to Brent and Scott.
I will try a "common" 230V relay (not a solid state relay) - like on the pictures. It will take some time until I get and give you the result, because I have not yet replaced the pump ;-). Best regards Stefan A54 #119 Lady Charlyette, currently La Palma - Canaries
|
|
Re: Firefly batteries
Bill Kinney
Paul,
Our electrical system is basically all Victron and we have installed their Cerbo GX to monitor and control all the bits and pieces. The key key piece for the batteries is the BMV Battery Monitor. In addition to all the usual functions of bank voltage and amp usage tracking, it can monitor the difference between the "top" of the bank and the "bottom". All the batteries on the 0 to 12 volt side are tied together. Likewise, all of them on the 12 to 24 volt side. In the ideal world, the voltage inside each group would be exactly one half of the overall bank voltage, or (nominally) 12 volts. If a single battery was to develop an internal short that half of the battery bank would drop in voltage, and the other half would rise, increasing the difference between them. Normally our batteries run with a 0.00V difference. Toward the end of a hard charging cycle we can see up to a 0.04V difference. We have an alarm set to flag if the difference gets above 0.06V. So far, it has never gone off. I have attached the voltage graph from our last full discharge and rapid recharge. The discharge rate was pretty steady at 50 Amps for about 10 hours. The charge rate was all the batteries could take, or 200 Amps whichever came first. It was pretty warm that day, so the absorption voltage was a bit lower than you might expect. The top and bottom difference increased as the batteries approached fully empty, during the steepest part of the bulk phase, and in the middle of the absorption phase, all of which is normal behavior. Bill Kinney SM160, Harmonie Annapolis, MD, USA
|
|
Re: Amel 54 v Beneteau 55
I’ve had the opportunity to do long passages on both Amel Super Maramu’s and a Beneteau Sense 55 back to back and I agree that there isn’t much of a comparison. While the 55 had a lot more room both below and above deck and would be a much better charter boat (the reason my cousin bought it), at sea they are completely different animals. That wide open rear deck and seats at the aft corners looks marvellous at the dock but out in big seas or even motoring downwind it’s not a very fun place to be (the exhaust gets you). No way you can really sail it singlehanded as even racking the boat things are way too far away from the helm stations. The winches are used for furling the massive Genoa and that can only be done from one side so again, it’s at least a two person job. It was fast downhill as we saw 10 knots fairly consistently but the motion wasn’t great with a lot of banging of that big flat stern. The cockpit was extremely wide with no proper handholds (same in the galley) so the boat on the lean was actually dangerous as if you fell off the top side to the bottom you’d fly across 10-12’ of space before intercepting something hard to stop (hopefully) you.
The electrical systems on the Beneteau were bare minimum and sprinkled all throughout the boat making diagnostics much tougher. We had to get into some really tight locations and empty out entire lockers to get at key things which seemed really poor planning. The inverters were really cheap and small (and lasted about as long as you’d expect). It had three separate battery banks, including one up front for the bow thruster, none in easy spots to get at so I suspect regular inspections would suffer. Engine and generator access was poor and I can’t imagine having to work on the generator at sea. Both were undersized in my humble opinion. Same goes for the winches and brakes. The sail control lines were a mess running all over (and under the deck) and not a lot made sense as you couldn’t trace a line to what it did. With time, you’d of course learn but for new crew (and owners) it wasn’t intuitive like the Amels. You also NEED to be on deck to furl which was disappointing to say the least. That said, the boats are designed and intended for completely different missions. If I was doing a charter in the BVI’s or sitting at the dock or anchor for months in end, I’d pick the Beneteau as it’s a heck of a lot of boat (real estate wise) for the money. That front owners cabin as humongous and the two private cabins are a nice touch with lots of privacy but not a proper sea bunk on the boat. If I had to sail it out of there to get away from anything stronger than 30!knots, I’d trade two of them for an Amel in a heartbeat. For cruising around the world, for me there is no comparison. I think that a cruising couple should be able to single hand sail and that’s just not possible on the big Beneteau. You’d be sailing around with the sails furled up as a precaution and then wouldn’t be able to get at the extra speed it can carry because of the long waterline. To each their own but I know which I’d pick. Brent
On Oct 8, 2021, 4:16 AM -0400, ngtnewington Newington via groups.io <ngtnewington@...>, wrote:
Fellow Amel owners --
Brent Cameron Future Amel Owner & Amel Owner Registry Moderator Oro-Medonte, Ontario, Canada
|
|
Re: Firefly batteries
Paul Dowd and Sharon Brown
Thank you Bill and all others who have responded. The feedback has been very helpful, and it is quite likely that I will go for the Fireflys. I had in mind 12 x G31s so nice to have that corroboration. Bill you mention briefly about your monitoring system. Could you possibly elaborate a bit on exactly what that is?
Cheers, Paul
Paul Dowd & Sharon Brown S/Y Ya Fohi, Amel 54 #98 skype: pauldowd
From: main@AmelYachtOwners.groups.io <main@AmelYachtOwners.groups.io> On Behalf Of Bill Kinney
Sent: 08 October 2021 06:09 To: main@AmelYachtOwners.groups.io Subject: Re: [AmelYachtOwners] Firefly batteries
Paul, -- Cheers Paul Ya Fohi - Amel 54 #98
|
|
Re: Retractable bow thruster maintenance on a Sharki
Google nikimat bow thruster. There is a complete walk thru with dozens of pics. Of course, bill's material too...
|
|
Re: Retractable bow thruster maintenance on a Sharki
Paul Peschel
Thanks so much for all your valuable feedback! Is there any kind of handbook / documentation for the bow thruster available?
|
|
Amel 54 v Beneteau 55
Fellow Amel owners
I am so happy I bought an Amel 54… I am doing a delivery of a Beneteau 55. You would think that she would out-sail my 54….. No way….She just does not go without lots of wind. It must be that wide stern twin rudder arrangement. It is sticky. It does not have a pole! So down wind is painful. Then the twin helms are so exposed I fear falling overboard, no wonder life jackets and harnesses are de-rigeur…do not get me started on the engineering, the finish, the motion at sea…. “Love knows not it’s own depth until the hour of separation” is as true with lovers as with boats…. Nick Temporarily separated from Amelia AML 54-019
|
|
Re: Firefly batteries
Bill Kinney
Paul,
We have a full set of Firefly batteries, and love them. We periodically do a complete discharge to dead flat, and a rapid recharge as Firefly recommends as a "restoration charge." Every time we we have done this we carefully monitor the amount of power discharged. Each time the amount of power they have delivered has been above the original specification sheet value, and it is still the same as the day we installed them. The last I looked, it seemed that Firefly bumped up the rated specification of the batteries from 116A-hr to 120A-hr which is more in line with what we measure. We take good care of them, but while out on the hook, we certainly do not bring them fully charged every day. They don't care. For the way we use our boat, they give us all the benefit that a set of Lithiums would, at a significant discount. They never have had any trouble with powering the bow thruster, or high loads out of the inverter. At a steady 50 amp draw the voltage stays remarkably steady all the way down to about 15% SOC. Some issues to watch for: Firefly recommends that the batteries be charged at between 0.2 and 0.5C My recollection of a 54 is that you have 12 G31 batteries. That would give you a bank of 720 A-hrs. Charging that large a back at a rate of 0.2*720 = 144 Amps might be a challenge with a standard charging setup. Our older SM has a 480 A-hr battery bank. We have a DC generator that outputs 150 amps at 24 volts, so it fits well within the minimums recommended. If you can't reach the recommended minimums, they request you talk to their technical staff for an alternative procedure. I don't know what this is, but it might be worth investigating up front if it might be an issue for you. Early in their production run Firefly had difficulty with the occasional battery developing a shorted cell. Left undetected, this can bring down the entire bank in short order because of charge imbalances. It is not a problem unique to these batteries, any type of lead acid battery can have this problem, but it seemed Firefly had more than their fair share. We had this happen to us, and Firefly was 100% helpful and completely took care of us under warrantee. Our current monitoring system doesn't allow this to happen without us knowing about it very quickly. We have 615W of solar. Our normal daily power usage is about 3kW-hrs, and solar can make about half this. During our normal charging cycle while at anchor in good weather we end up in the morning at about 75% SOC. Over a sunny day, the solar panels bring the batteries up to about 90%. The next morning, the batteries drop to about 60-65% SOC. The generator starts in the early morning, runs for 80 to 90 minutes, and brings the bank up to 93% where it shuts down, and the solar panels have the bank at 100% by 3PM. And the same two day cycle repeats. We find we get excellent utilization for the power available from our solar panels, and the generator runs most of its time at high load, where it is most efficient. For us, minimizing expensive generator run time is important. We have looked very hard, and sharpened our pencils a lot, and for us we just don't see a benefit to Li batteries that justify the higher costs. But every boat works differently, and everybody has different needs. Bill Kinney SM160, Harmonie Annapolis, MD, USA
|
|
Re: Firefly batteries
Jamie Wendell
Paul, I had them installed several years ago and they all failed to deliver for me after a couple of years. The issue was always voltage drop under high loads like bow thrusters, etc. Eventually, I could not keep them charged properly - I had low-voltage alarms almost every night.
I do not want to dissuade you from taking that route, as I know others have used them successfully. Maybe I am a unique situation with higher than average loads, but I am just reporting my bad experience. I ditched them for LiFePO4 batteries 2 years ago. Without any doubt, the lithiums have been excellent, with the most significant feature being (to me) that they retain a constant voltage throughout the discharge cycle. I will never return to any type of lead-acid batteries. Keep in mind that Fireflys are a type of lead-acid battery, albeit with the added benefit of carbon foam. Hope that gives you my perspective. Jamie Phantom, A54 #44
|
|
Re: Firefly batteries
Mike Longcor (SV Trilogy)
Installed ours in May 2019. I give them a thumbs up. It's comforting to know that they can be in a partial SOC without causing significant damage or drastically shortening their lifespan. Will be interesting to see how long they actually do last, cycling pretty much every day. They're technically an AGM battery, carbon foam AGM. Ideally they get topped up to 100% once a week. And should get a periodic "restoration charge", which we've only done a couple times because it's only really feasible with shore power. We weren't quite ready for a switch to lithium so we went with these. Cheers, Mike Longcor SV Trilogy SM23 NZ
On Fri, Oct 8, 2021, 8:30 AM Paul Dowd and Sharon Brown <paul.dowd@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: 1981 Maramu pre-survey
James, Have owned my Maramu for 19 years in Greek waters. Can’t seem to escape heaven. My heater has not worked for the last three years, I am going to check out this glow plug recommendation. Like most systems on a Maramu, I think the heater is essentially bulletproof. Thermostat for the heater is in the aft cabin above the bunk. Maramus forever…
v/r Steve
Sent from Mail for Windows
|
|
Re: 1981 Maramu pre-survey
James Alton
Mark,
Many thanks for the inspiration to look into rebuilding our D4. I hope to remove and inspect it over the weekend. Would you happen to know if service parts are still available for these older D4 heaters?
BTW, there seem to be quite a few Sharki's in the Preveza Greece area, really nice boats!
Best,
James
SV Sueno
Maramu #220
-----Original Message-----
From: marklesparkle59 <marklesparkle59@...> To: main@amelyachtowners.groups.io Sent: Thu, Oct 7, 2021 8:54 pm Subject: Re: [AmelYachtOwners] 1981 Maramu pre-survey Hi James, my 1983 D4 still works,we just had to change the glow plug and off it went after at least 6 years un used. The exhaust has been repaired at some stage with a car repair kit. But it works well.
Mark Porter
Sea Hobo Sharki #96
Mark Porter
Steve,
|
|
Re: Firefly batteries
Michael Winand
Hi Paul, we installed firefly batteries 2 years ago, happy with them, I have experience with wet cell batteries, firefly are easier to maintain. I can't compare them with gels or agm styles. We have a large frame 175amp alternator, 1kw solar, 5kw quattro, we only use the genset if we have limited sunshine. Can run 1 aircon during the day on a hot summer day. Michael Nebo sm251
On Fri, 8 Oct 2021, 5:30 am Paul Dowd and Sharon Brown, <paul.dowd@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: Firefly batteries
If you search this group you will find extensive postings regarding Fireflys from sv Harmonie. Or you can look on their website: https://fetchinketch.net
With best regards,
Mark
Skipper Sailing Vessel - Cream Puff - SM2K - #275 Currently cruising - Tahiti, French Polynesia www.creampuff.us
From:
main@AmelYachtOwners.groups.io [mailto:main@AmelYachtOwners.groups.io] On
Behalf Of Paul Dowd and Sharon Brown
Hi all,
I am curious to know if anyone has any experience with Firefly batteries, and if so whether they are recommended.
Cheers, Paul
Paul Dowd & Sharon Brown S/Y Ya Fohi, Amel 54 #98 skype: pauldowd
|
|
Firefly batteries
Paul Dowd and Sharon Brown
Hi all,
I am curious to know if anyone has any experience with Firefly batteries, and if so whether they are recommended.
Cheers, Paul
Paul Dowd & Sharon Brown S/Y Ya Fohi, Amel 54 #98 skype: pauldowd
-- Cheers Paul Ya Fohi - Amel 54 #98
|
|
Re: Air con circulating pump
It’s not hard to find relays that can be energized by 240VAC signals and that can switch 24VDC devices. You just want to be sure that the switching capacity isn’t exceeded (eg trying to use a 10Amp relay to control a 20Amp motor). You also need to understand if the circuit is normally open or normally closed (or the relay is energized to close contacts to start/run the motor or vis versa). My guess would be Normally Open which also means the relay can be depowered when not needed and will use no power when the motor isn’t running). You also want to be sure that the relay can handle the start currents of the motor as they can be considerably higher than the run current.
Brent
On Oct 7, 2021, 1:41 PM -0400, Scott SV Tengah <Scott.nguyen@...>, wrote:
--
Brent Cameron Future Amel Owner & Amel Owner Registry Moderator Oro-Medonte, Ontario, Canada
|
|