[Amel Yacht Owners] Re: 110 lb Bruce Anchor
Anne and John Hollamby <hollamby@...>
Message text written by INTERNET:amelyachtowners@yahoogroups.com
<Hello Richard, I would take any test results by any magazine with a large pinch of salt. For a really incomplete test see the pathetic report in the December issue of "Sailing Today". Bear in mind that journalists are not liveaboards and almost certainly keep their boats in marinas and never anchor overnight in all conditions. No anchor is perfect in every situation but properly deployed Bruces, Spades and Bugels are top class in most bottoms whereas a Danforth type will be better in others. Hang on in there ! John Bali Hai, SM 319
|
|
[Amel Yacht Owners] London Boat Show
Anne and John Hollamby <hollamby@...>
Message text written by INTERNET:amelyachtowners@yahoogroups.com
<Hi Ian, Wow, I am glad I did not bother to attend. I shall have to save my pennies for the Dusseldorf Show next year. Regards, John SM319 Bali Hai
|
|
Re: 110 lb Bruce Anchor
Bengt,
Sorry, I haven't proceeded with fitting the big Bruce up there on the bow--so nothing to report. I stopped short of this because of the success of the Spade anchors in tests conducted in the various press, including Pratical Sailor. And the recent issue of Yachting Monthly conducted a test of anchors, with poor reviews for the Bruce and Bruce clones. If anyone has a suggestion on where to find the best price on a 30kg galvanized Spade, that'd be great. Richard Tate SM "Spice" --- In amelyachtowners@yahoogroups.com, Louise o Bengt Mårtensson <tintoamel@y...> wrote: Long ago You wrote about fitting an 110 lb Bruce anchor.
|
|
Re: 110 lb Bruce Anchor
Louise o Bengt Mårtensson <tintoamel@...>
Long ago You wrote about fitting an 110 lb Bruce anchor.
How did it fit? Did it work well for You. best regards Bengt Mårtensson --- In amelyachtowners@yahoogroups.com, closereach <no_reply@y...> wrote: the2-Dodger windows: When taking significant spray and going into windowssun you are almost blind. Has anyone used anything on these ofto improve visibility such as rainX? Also, the helmsman windowRT: We found on our trip traveling down the ICW that when motoring spray on the dodger window and makes it very hard to peer forward.I too would like to know of some 'magic' way to improve visibility.a 40lb danford. What other anchors are being carried out there.RT: We found our 60 lb. CQR worked great everywhere but one place--
|
|
Re: A Relay from Rob Brennan
koenvelleman <no_reply@...>
Hi Rob,
Forgot 1 important item...The fake leather ceiling lining from early SM's (and Maramu's Sharki's etc), falls down... This material is foam backed and the foam just desintegrates.. The hotter the climat the faster it desintegrates. The whole boat is covered with this material also inside lockers etc.. I don't know exactly when Amel changed this, but guess it must have been 93-94. Most boats I have seen solved this with some wooden linings, this works tempory as after a while the whole foam desintegrates and vinyl is hanging loose between the wooden linings. Amel now uses the same material but backed with felt. The only good solution is to remove the old vinyl all over the boat, and re-glue with the new stuff. The result is as new, but it took us nearly 3 weeks with 3 people. Hope this is of any help for You Koen --- In amelyachtowners@yahoogroups.com, "Ian Shepherd" <g4ljf@c...> wrote: To the Amel Network: Greetings!years. And am about to graduate as an owner member. I'm excited and a little daunted. The boat, Signore dei Mari is lying Antalya, and very soon to become Australian owned. She has been Swiss owned (and very loved since launch in 1989/90. please with: Europe/Turkey relevant to my finalising my purchase. In anticipation - thank you and best regards.
|
|
London Boat Show
Ian Shepherd <g4ljf@...>
Hi John,
I was not impressed with the London Boat Show at the new ExCel site. I never thought that much of Earls Court either, but at least it was on two levels and you could get a good idea of the layout and where you needed to go. The trip out to Docklands was a bit of a mystery. The trick is to stay on the Bakerloo line all the way to Canning Town, then change to the DLR. We queued for almost 30 minutes to buy tickets. Only half the ticket kiosks were in operation. Get yours prior to arriving and you will get straight in. I found finding your way around very difficult. I wasted most of the day trying to fathom out where those people I wanted to see were located. Even with detailed instructions from the information desk, it was a maze. There are no overhead signs and many of the exhibitors had removed their stand numbers as it did not fit in with their logo! All of the restaurants were booked out for lunch. The alternative sandwich bars etc were of dreadful quality. The outside boat display was very disappointing with very few yachts on display. I fact I got the impression that the show was very much a power boat show rather than a sail boat show, but so perhaps was Earls Court. The indoor wind surfing display was not working due to 'technical difficulties'. I will never go back. The Southampton show is the one I really like, though if you want a really first class show that has everything and is well laid out and easy to navigate, I would recommend Düsseldorf. No, Amel were not there, but they do attend Southampton. Best Wishes Ian [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|
|
inner forestay
eric freedman <kimberlt@...>
hi,
has anyone rigged an inner forestay on a super maramu? thanks eric
|
|
Re: [Amel Yacht Owners] Re: A Relay from Rob Brennan
Ron & Heather Brown <ronandheath@...>
Hi From Heather and Ron Brown - we have recently purchased SM171 -
Tradewinds III-in Perth and sailed her around "over the top" to our home port of Southport. We are very happy with her although as always there are a few things to add or fix - davits, sails and a leaking end on the watermaker. When these are done we expect to head off to the Louisiades this season and hopefully SE Asia next season. Not sure where you are based in OZ - maybe we can make contact sometime. Ron and Heather Brown ---------- From: koenvelleman <no_reply@yahoogroups.com> To: amelyachtowners@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Amel Yacht Owners] Re: A Relay from Rob Brennan Date: SatMon 17 17Jan 0220042002 0212:33 PM Hi Rob, Here a few answers to Ur questions: The Med is a big place and there are huge differences in quality and prices of services, what will be Ur route ? I never used any fuel additive, not in Europe nor in the rest of the world. As for antifouling I always used Micron by International paints, its widely available and self polishing. Ofcourse all depend what has been used previously. The early SM had some problems: 1) The early Z-drive was changed to a much more stronger version. There have been a lot of problems with this early drive. (broken gears). As the unit is sealed it is not possible to repair. The new drive solved all the problems. Replacing the old drive for the new one is possible and best done at the Amel wharf. Be prepaired for a salty invoice. Try to have a look at a recent SM so that U can see the difference. I had personaly no problems with this drive, but I know of several boats who suffered damage. The people from Amel have warned me that it was riscky to leave Europe with the early drive. (I changed it) 2) The early headsail furling was CRAP. Most older SM have changed this unit to a new version (there a several versions), but some seldom used boats still have this old unit. Also the older profile has only 2 sail tracks and a different head, wich means that U can not roll the ballooner and genoa together in a downwind squall...a big disadvantage. There a a few ways around this problem but the best solution is to change the alu profile and head. (3 tracks) 3) The mainsail electric drive had also its problems. The early drive gearboxes are Italien industrial gearboxes with a mild steel shaft wich is exposed. This shaft rusts and the sealing starts leaking. Amel used normal grease and this grease doesn't like seawater and becomes stone-hard. It is important to strip these units before a big trip, replace the sealings and pack with a grease that supports seawater. (Locktite for ex has such grease, also Amel uses a similar grease now. The early angle reverser is of a very poor design, change it to the new design or U risk of being unable to roll the main in.. (also not manually!) Got this problem personaly. 4) The original ZEISSE genset created a lot of problems. Most SM changed to another brand. The main problem was cooling. The seawaterpump is driven by a tiny belt wich slips and breaks. I put this pump directly on the cranckshaft (as prepared by Farymann diesel) and changed the cooling to fresh water cooling. My unit is still working perfect under all sea conditions. 5) The electrical system of the early SM's is not fit for offshore cruising. The boat is all electric, the charging and batteries are completly unsufficient. As Amel tackled this problem quite late, somewhere in the mid 90, U will see most SM running their gensets for hours in offshore anchorages. Some SM's have an alternator on the prop and this works fantastic. We run radar, lights, fridge, freezer, laptop, SSB, C-Sat, weatherfax, autopilot, breadmachine etc without running the genset or engine when sailing. The problems start when anchoring. I dubbeled the batteries, replaced the 20amp charger with a 75amp one (Mastervolt), put an extra 50 amp alternator on the main engine. 40 min genset in the morning and evening will keeps my batteries happy (in the tropics). 6) The early Autohelm 7000 had some mechanical problems. A plastic gear in the drive breaks in heavy seas. They changed this gear to a copper one. Its easy to correct this problem. As I had doubts about the Autohelm pilots (from previous exper.), I changed the main pilot to B&G, with the added advantage that it can talk to the B&G instruments. I heard from early SM owners that they are quite happy with their Autohelm 7000 (after changing the plastic gear). 7) The electric Lewmar winches on the early SM's had also sealing problems. If this gets serious then water gets to the gearbox and moter unit. This can be solved if their is no damage to the gearbox. The positive side is that the after-sale service of Amel is very good and that none of the problems I had are structural. The 1989 SM and the 2004 SM are basicly the same, wich is a proof of the very well tought design. That Amel improves equipment and details is normal. By following their important changes You can improve Your boat to the new standards and that makes an Amel unique. Fair Winds ! Koen Flash IV SM17 --- In amelyachtowners@yahoogroups.com, "Ian Shepherd" <g4ljf@c...> wrote: To the Amel Network: Greetings!years. And am about to graduate as an owner member. I'm excited and a little daunted. The boat, Signore dei Mari is lying Antalya, and very soon to become Australian owned. She has been Swiss owned (and very loved since launch in 1989/90. please with: Europe/Turkey relevant to my finalising my purchase. In anticipation - thank you and best regards.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ADVERTISEMENT ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yahoo! Groups Links To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amelyachtowners/ To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: amelyachtowners-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com <mailto:amelyachtowners-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .
|
|
[Amel Yacht Owners] Anchors
Anne and John Hollamby <hollamby@...>
Message text written by INTERNET:amelyachtowners@yahoogroups.com
<Dear Ian, Thanks for the tip about omitting the swivel, I will try it next season. It would also mean that I ccould take off the anode which is still there as I have not been able to find a big galvanised swivel ! Incidentally the shiny stainless swivel is now coated in magnesium since I fitted the galvanised Turkish made Bugel type anchor (36 kgs and 300 euros). Love to hear your experience of the London Boat Show now that it has emigrated to Docklands as the long trek on Londons public transport discouraged me from going. Was Amel there? Regards, John Bali Hai SM2000/319
|
|
Re: [Amel Yacht Owners] Fuel capacity
kimberlt <kimberlt@...>
Dear Ann & John,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I also printed out a chart converting Liters to gallons and imperial gallons which I have laminated and stuck under the lid where the fuel fill is located- it reads in reverse- if the dip stick reads x liters you need to add y gallons. When we fill I also station someone at the overfill as you can hear the tank getting full. Here is part of a note I sent to Ian & Judy, We carry 260 gallons of diesel on a passage. 160 in the main tank 50 gallons in a nauta tank and 50 gallons in Gerry cans both in the port locker. As soon as we use up the first 50 gallons, we empty the nauta tank and put more stuff in the port locker from the stern. I hooked up a 24-volt transfer pump to empty out the nauta tank, and use a cheap $5.00 siphon pump for the Gerry cans. Much neater than trying to aim a can at a moving funnel. We have the 100 hp yanmar engine. What did you use to fasten your mizzen traveler control lines to in the cockpit? Fair winds, Eric Freedman Kimberlite SM 376
-----Original Message-----
From: Anne and John Hollamby [mailto:hollamby@compuserve.com] Sent: Saturday, January 17, 2004 1:21 PM To: INTERNET:amelyachtowners@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [Amel Yacht Owners] Fuel capacity Dear Ian and Judy, Thanks for your advice. If, as and when we do another ocean voyage, we shall carry a lot of spare fuel in cans in the big locker to the port side of the cockpit which should weight on the weather rail in the trade winds. This would be possible as we have altered the lifelines on the transom to take a cradle for our life raft. See the photo in the Bali Hai album. We have never tried to fill the tank completely as we have yet to go long distance so we cannot comment on that point. I suppose we are very conscious of the risk of an overflow as our Oyster used to overflow over the teak deck as well as sucking sea water in through the breather pipe when motor sailing to sail closer on port tack in strong winds and seas.( We altered the plumbing pretty quickly after getting rid of the water out of the injection pump, luckily the water only got through after the boat had been standing in harbour overnight). There are times when I think that I have made a mistake in reading the dipstick or in my arithmetic when the tank takes more than it should but on the other hand it may be an optimistic meter on the fuel tanker! Best wishes from Malta, Anne and John Bali Hai SM2000/319 _____ Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amelyachtowners/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: amelyachtowners-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com <mailto:amelyachtowners-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe> * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Service.
|
|
Re: [Amel Yacht Owners] Fuel capacity
Anne and John Hollamby <hollamby@...>
Message text written by INTERNET:amelyachtowners@yahoogroups.com
<Hi Ian and also Michael Glass, Thanks for your comments. I certainly concur about having spare fuel in case of mishap having been on two ocean racers which lost their rigs and only carried a tiny amount of fuel to save weight! Regards and best wishes, Anne and John. Bali Hai, SM2000 319
|
|
Re: [Amel Yacht Owners] Fuel capacity
Anne and John Hollamby <hollamby@...>
Dear Ian and Judy,
Thanks for your advice. If, as and when we do another ocean voyage, we shall carry a lot of spare fuel in cans in the big locker to the port side of the cockpit which should weight on the weather rail in the trade winds. This would be possible as we have altered the lifelines on the transom to take a cradle for our life raft. See the photo in the Bali Hai album. We have never tried to fill the tank completely as we have yet to go long distance so we cannot comment on that point. I suppose we are very conscious of the risk of an overflow as our Oyster used to overflow over the teak deck as well as sucking sea water in through the breather pipe when motor sailing to sail closer on port tack in strong winds and seas.( We altered the plumbing pretty quickly after getting rid of the water out of the injection pump, luckily the water only got through after the boat had been standing in harbour overnight). There are times when I think that I have made a mistake in reading the dipstick or in my arithmetic when the tank takes more than it should but on the other hand it may be an optimistic meter on the fuel tanker! Best wishes from Malta, Anne and John Bali Hai SM2000/319
|
|
[Amel Yacht Owners] Re: A Relay from Rob Brennan
Anne and John Hollamby <hollamby@...>
Message text written by INTERNET:amelyachtowners@yahoogroups.com
<Hi Rob, Whereabouts are you in Oz? We shall be in Perth for about a week from 28 Jan and Sydney for a couple of weeks from 7 Feb. Always happy to meet up if you want to do Amel and Med speak. Regards, Anne and John Bali Hai, SM 2000 /319
|
|
Anchors
Ian Shepherd <g4ljf@...>
Hi Ian,
I agree entirely with your remarks that the Spade is better that the Wasi Bugel. When my Stainless Amel CQR came apart one night during a cold frontal passagein the Bahamas, I replaced it with a 30 Kg Spade from West Marine. The difference in holding was remarkable. Unfortunately I sold that anchor with my first boat. The second boat came with a Wasi. It holds well, but the disadvantage is that it seldom comes up to the bow roller the right way up! Have any seaweed or mud on the crown, then forget it. You will have to make a trip to the bow and twist the chain by hand which completely defeats the objective of being able to handle the anchor from the cockpit. As you say, the tip weight on the Spade is far superior to the Wasi, and I don't ever remember the Spade arriving at the bow roller upside down. I don't think that the swivel that is supplied with the Wasi helps the situation either. I talked this over with three anchor suppliers at the London Boat Show, and they all recommended removing the swivel. They all thought that the swivel served little purpose and introduced a weak link in the system. The wall thickness of most swivels where the pin goes through is significantly weaker than a high quality shackle. Without the swivel, the anchor stands a better chance of coming up the way it went down. Speaking of anchors, does anyone agree that the primary bow roller has too flat a profile? It only takes a small yaw for the chain to run off the side of the roller which results in metal to metal contact and for the chain to rub against the starboard side of the GRP chain gulley on the foredeck. A deeper profiled roller would cure this problem. (This flat profile may be peculiar to the latest boats produced. I don't remember the problem on the first boat). Incidentally, the price of the 30 Kg Spade at the show was significantly cheaper than the West Marine price, though West may have lowered their price from the $995 that I paid two years ago. However, with the Dollar going south at the moment .............. Regarding tack angles, you are spot on. Using Nobeltec software, I pre-plan tacks at a 120 degree track angle and it usually it works out well. Yes you will do better if the current is in your favour on one tack, but 120 degrees is a good ball park figure. I have Demi sails on my new boat. I have not yet made up my mind if they are better or worse than the Gateff laminated sails that I had on the first boat. Amel say that the new sails will allow you to point better, but I really have not noticed it. I have noticed a few strange looking wrinkles appearing though which does cause me some concern over the long term. Regards Ian Shepherd SM # 414 "Crusader"
|
|
Re: A Relay from Rob Brennan
koenvelleman <no_reply@...>
Hi Rob,
Here a few answers to Ur questions: The Med is a big place and there are huge differences in quality and prices of services, what will be Ur route ? I never used any fuel additive, not in Europe nor in the rest of the world. As for antifouling I always used Micron by International paints, its widely available and self polishing. Ofcourse all depend what has been used previously. The early SM had some problems: 1) The early Z-drive was changed to a much more stronger version. There have been a lot of problems with this early drive. (broken gears). As the unit is sealed it is not possible to repair. The new drive solved all the problems. Replacing the old drive for the new one is possible and best done at the Amel wharf. Be prepaired for a salty invoice. Try to have a look at a recent SM so that U can see the difference. I had personaly no problems with this drive, but I know of several boats who suffered damage. The people from Amel have warned me that it was riscky to leave Europe with the early drive. (I changed it) 2) The early headsail furling was CRAP. Most older SM have changed this unit to a new version (there a several versions), but some seldom used boats still have this old unit. Also the older profile has only 2 sail tracks and a different head, wich means that U can not roll the ballooner and genoa together in a downwind squall...a big disadvantage. There a a few ways around this problem but the best solution is to change the alu profile and head. (3 tracks) 3) The mainsail electric drive had also its problems. The early drive gearboxes are Italien industrial gearboxes with a mild steel shaft wich is exposed. This shaft rusts and the sealing starts leaking. Amel used normal grease and this grease doesn't like seawater and becomes stone-hard. It is important to strip these units before a big trip, replace the sealings and pack with a grease that supports seawater. (Locktite for ex has such grease, also Amel uses a similar grease now. The early angle reverser is of a very poor design, change it to the new design or U risk of being unable to roll the main in.. (also not manually!) Got this problem personaly. 4) The original ZEISSE genset created a lot of problems. Most SM changed to another brand. The main problem was cooling. The seawaterpump is driven by a tiny belt wich slips and breaks. I put this pump directly on the cranckshaft (as prepared by Farymann diesel) and changed the cooling to fresh water cooling. My unit is still working perfect under all sea conditions. 5) The electrical system of the early SM's is not fit for offshore cruising. The boat is all electric, the charging and batteries are completly unsufficient. As Amel tackled this problem quite late, somewhere in the mid 90, U will see most SM running their gensets for hours in offshore anchorages. Some SM's have an alternator on the prop and this works fantastic. We run radar, lights, fridge, freezer, laptop, SSB, C-Sat, weatherfax, autopilot, breadmachine etc without running the genset or engine when sailing. The problems start when anchoring. I dubbeled the batteries, replaced the 20amp charger with a 75amp one (Mastervolt), put an extra 50 amp alternator on the main engine. 40 min genset in the morning and evening will keeps my batteries happy (in the tropics). 6) The early Autohelm 7000 had some mechanical problems. A plastic gear in the drive breaks in heavy seas. They changed this gear to a copper one. Its easy to correct this problem. As I had doubts about the Autohelm pilots (from previous exper.), I changed the main pilot to B&G, with the added advantage that it can talk to the B&G instruments. I heard from early SM owners that they are quite happy with their Autohelm 7000 (after changing the plastic gear). 7) The electric Lewmar winches on the early SM's had also sealing problems. If this gets serious then water gets to the gearbox and moter unit. This can be solved if their is no damage to the gearbox. The positive side is that the after-sale service of Amel is very good and that none of the problems I had are structural. The 1989 SM and the 2004 SM are basicly the same, wich is a proof of the very well tought design. That Amel improves equipment and details is normal. By following their important changes You can improve Your boat to the new standards and that makes an Amel unique. Fair Winds ! Koen Flash IV SM17 --- In amelyachtowners@yahoogroups.com, "Ian Shepherd" <g4ljf@c...> wrote: To the Amel Network: Greetings!years. And am about to graduate as an owner member. I'm excited and a little daunted. The boat, Signore dei Mari is lying Antalya, and very soon to become Australian owned. She has been Swiss owned (and very loved since launch in 1989/90. please with: Europe/Turkey relevant to my finalising my purchase. In anticipation - thank you and best regards.
|
|
Re: [Amel Yacht Owners] Opinionated remarks
ianjenkins1946 <ianjudyjenkins@hotmail.com>
Dear John,
Loved your tip of fitting an anode to the anchor chain. How obvious, though I have never seen it done. I have a Spade, stainless, 30 kg, at whose altar I worship.50% of the weight in the tip as against 16% for the Bugel and a concave shape for ( I think) better resistance. I have yet to see an anchor test where the Spade hasnt come out ahead of all others in the test, though I have not seen anyone test the Spade and Bugel against each other.Has anyone ? The Spade is the only product to have featured in consecutive years in Practical Sailors top ten products. Damned expensive, but it is developing a following. Antyhing has to better than the slippery plough! Gateff v. North....I beg to disagree! It sounds as though you had better luck with your Gateff genny than we did. Half furled, ours does a very passable imitation of my grandmothers bloomers on a washing line. Improved considerably with the addition of a foam luff, and not affected adversely when we , too, dumped the sock in favour of a UV strip. However, the switch to a North genny, 61 sqm against 64 for Gateff, cut higher, has proved really worthwhile--sets furled much better, greater visibility, less likelihood of catching a wave in the foot, and , not anticipated by me, it needs far less adjustment of the car than the Gateff. All now probably academic as Amel have a new sail maker( and have been talking to ...North.) At the end of the day, I would be interested to hear if anyone can better 120 degrees between tacks with a fully laden boat and last weeks swell competing with yesterdays waves and todays windshift.I also wonder what other cruising boats do any better than 105 between tacks? Ian. Pen Azen. SM 302 From: Anne and John Hollamby <hollamby@compuserve.com>_________________________________________________________________ Express yourself with cool emoticons - download MSN Messenger today! http://www.msn.co.uk/messenger
|
|
Re: [Amel Yacht Owners] Annual Haul Out
kimberlt <kimberlt@...>
Stephan,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
We just had our bottom done. It was sanded and we had 2 coats of pettit ultima ablative paint applied. We used 5 gallons. I also replaced the two lip seals for the bow thruster- one on the thruster shaft and one in the thruster through hull opening and 3 spongy inserts. You should also replace the wearing out bearing and the 3 seals on the prop shaft and the sail drive oil. The zincs on the rudder and the zinc and bearings on the weed cutter if you have one. Also, check the screws in the rudder hinge. Fair winds, Eric SM 376 kimberlite
-----Original Message-----
From: Stephan Regulinski [mailto:stephreg@yahoo.com] Sent: Friday, January 16, 2004 3:30 PM To: amelyachtowners@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Amel Yacht Owners] Annual Haul Out We are planning a haul out in the next several months. Can anyone advise on basic bottom paint stuff? 1. How much bottom paint should we plan on buying? 2. How many coats are applied? 3. Is a prep coat of something required before bottom paint? 4. What surface prep is required? Since we will not be in an Amel yard, I want to know how it is best done, not what the local guy thinks! I also understand that I should service the bow thruster, change the seals and oil in the sail drive and check/replace the zincs. Am I missing anything important? Thanks for your help, Stephan G. Regulinski S/V Delos (SMM #303) _____ Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amelyachtowners/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: amelyachtowners-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com <mailto:amelyachtowners-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe> * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Service.
|
|
Annual Haul Out
Stephan Regulinski
We are planning a haul out in the next several months. Can anyone
advise on basic bottom paint stuff? 1. How much bottom paint should we plan on buying? 2. How many coats are applied? 3. Is a prep coat of something required before bottom paint? 4. What surface prep is required? Since we will not be in an Amel yard, I want to know how it is best done, not what the local guy thinks! I also understand that I should service the bow thruster, change the seals and oil in the sail drive and check/replace the zincs. Am I missing anything important? Thanks for your help, Stephan G. Regulinski S/V Delos (SMM #303)
|
|
Re: [Amel Yacht Owners] Fuel capacity
Michael Glass <mglass@...>
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
ff-----Original Message-----
[Michael Glass] Take extra fuel. As much as possible. Although it depends on sea state and a multitude of other factors, I usually figure a range of about 700-800 miles to be conservative on a tank travelling at 2000-2001 rpm with the Volvo Penta diesel. From: Anne and John Hollamby [mailto:hollamby@compuserve.com] Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 1:34 PM To: amelyachtowners Subject: [Amel Yacht Owners] Fuel capacity Can anyone comment on the adequacy of the 600ltr fuel tank for long range sailing, say for transoceanic trips lasting 2-4 weeks? John and Anne Bali Hai SM 2000 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ADVERTISEMENT <http://rd.yahoo.com/SIG=12cqhha8b/M=267637.4116730.5333196.1261774/D=egroupweb/S=1705065792:HM/EXP=1074278036/A=1945638/R=0/*http://www.netflix.com/Default?mqso=60178383&partid=4116730> click here <http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?M=267637.4116730.5333196.1261774/D=egroupmail/S=:HM/A=1945638/rand=946163855> _____ Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amelyachtowners/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: amelyachtowners-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com <mailto:amelyachtowners-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe> * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .
|
|
Re: [Amel Yacht Owners] Fuel capacity
Ian Shepherd <g4ljf@...>
Hi John & Anne,
unless you are going to motor for days on end, you should have no worries about the fuel capacity. I have made two Atlantic crossings in SM2000's, one in the Trades and the other across the N.Atlantic and probably only used 1/8th of the capacity on the first and less than that on the second, when I had a wind generator and solar panels fitted. I no longer carry any spare cans of fuel. I can put the space saved to better use, though for more remote parts of the world, cans will be useful where you cannot get fuel that easily or even at a dock. You could work on about 1 imperial gallon per hour when motoring at 7 knots. It seems to work out that way for me. Always best to fill it up of course in case you get dismasted or blow the sails out! It can happen. Good Luck Ian Shepherd SM # 414 Crusader
|
|