Date   
Re: Maramu 46 Vs Santorin engine compartment

Daniel Alexander Thompson
 

Thanks for the replies. 

I really don't want to get a Santorin: the changes to their layout is not that great. 

So if the Meltem, Mango and Maramu don't have watertight aft cabin, then I think it's a Mango or a Meltem for me. 

My next question in t-minus 14 days will be:

How long will a Meltem hull last for? 100 years?

Re: How to make the most of Victron Multi-Plus Inverter/Charger on SM#387

islandpearl2_sm2k332
 

Hi Dan

Unfortunately I do not have the time right now to write a full response, but briefly looked at your diagram and can confirm that the Victron unit you describe is excellent and has serviced us particularly well. It also has an extra "direct power pass through" power outlet which you could run to the two original Amel Chargers (and watermaker) from if required.

Confirmed that we have this same unit wired as per your diagram, with the exception of the Duo AC/DC Water maker deletion. In other words, we do also run a/c power from the Amel switch (genset/shore power) to the Victon 3000w / 70amp 16a inverter/charger and on to the A/C switchboard which still includes the original switch for the water maker. The water maker has never tripped out over the 16amp BUT we probably have a more recent (2012 Duo a/c & dc 100/min) model water maker, not the previous 160L/Hr a/c only version. This could (I have not checked) mean that we need lower amperage, but in our case the water maker has never tripped over 16amps at peaks, and at times when we want to dump a little power ie. in full sun (1.04kw solar) plus 20kts plus wind (2x 450w Rutland 1200's) we run the Water maker on a/c for an hour or two off the 3000w inverter only, so would therefore not want it to run on the Genset/Shore Power pass through circuit only.

A little tip we got from S/V Joy's previous owners was to place the remote control for the Victron unit next to the a/c switchboard (just below the speaker). This has been an excellent spot to control the inverter/charger from as it is next to the a/c switches. Also we located the Victron Inverter/Charger in the wet clothes locker area backing onto the wall to the day bed/ battery banks. This was to get it as close as possible to the batteries as recommended by Victron. 

Colin Streeter
SV Island Pearl II
Back in Newport Marina, Brisbane after completing a totally trouble free - 3 year 3,000nm circumnavigation this month

SV Island Pearl II FOR SALE - US$299,000  now fully serviced, and totally ready to cross oceans again 
Contact me at svislandpearl@... for inventory and pictures.
See our circumnavigation tracker map here: https://forecast.predictwind.com/tracking/display/IslandPearl2



Lastly 



On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 7:06 AM Dan Carlson <carlsdan61@...> wrote:

Hello all,  I have been thinking through the best way to install a Victron Multi-Plus Inverter/Charger on SM#387.   I am specifically looking at the 3000w/70a/24v/16a model.   I have seen several previous posts that have discussed aspects of installing Victron Inverter/Chargers.  These previous posts have included discussion of installing switches between sources of supply to the 230v panel, or dividing the 230v panel between the inverter supply and direct supply from shore or inverter…   I am considering the approach diagramed roughly in the attached photo and described below.  Please let me know your feedback, questions or concerns.    

 

A very brief summary of the he Victron Multi-plus: It will take 230v power from shore or generator (45-65Hz) as well as 24v power from a battery bank to provide 230v power for the boat.   The 16a model is limited to 16a current load.  From this it can provide up to 3000a from the inverter, with or with-out shore power.  Whenever there is excess 230v supply over housed demand for 230v, the inverter will switch to a charger mode to put energy back into the battery bank.   On SM#387 this is great for most of our needs as we are currently restricted to 16a on the Shore power already.   However; we do have one significant conflict for power demand and that is the 230v water-maker which draws approx. 13-14Amps.  

 

To best solve for this and to minimize the requirement for different switches I would like to connect the output from the Victron directly to the 230v panel to provide consistent ac power for the boat when whether on battery, shore power or generator.    And to solve the current demand needs by removing the water-maker and both of the battery charging breakers from the existing 230 panel.  See notes below for further explanations.

 

Design notes to accompany attached diagram: 

  1. This approach is based on the current 16a system/limit on Shore Power, the current Onan 7MDKAV generator and the current AMEL switch box that automatically switches between Shore or Generator as AC source.   I think that I will add a 16a breaker on the shore power as a good precaution as I work on my overall wiring.
  2. I will need to add a new breaker box, or perhaps I can use the existing breaker box that was used for the Pro-Sine 1800w inverter that currently supplies power to the boat. This is where I would have the breakers for the water-maker and also for the secondary battery charger (perhaps a Sterling 24v/30a charger).   This will be supplied directly from the AMEL switching relay box.
  3. This would allow me to re-move the wires for the water-maker and the secondary charger from the main 230v panel.  
  4. The breaker the 100a charger will also be removed from the 230v panel, and new wire will be added directly from the Amel switch to the Victron Inverter (with the appropriate fuses/breakers).
  5. The AC output from the Victron Multi-Plus inverter directly to the 230v panel  (I need to consider changing the existing 30a breaker on the main panel to based on the overall limit from the Victron.)
  6. Supply the battery power to the Victron Multi-plus from the existing cable that supplied the 100a charger (This looks like a 50mm2 cable, which is sufficient for up to 5meter run).
  7. Configuration:   The Victron Multi-Plus has a Power Control setting that sets a limit the current that it will draw on the AC input source.   I could set this to a max of 10amps.  The rationale for this is:
    1. When I am running the generator and I turn on the water-maker I have already limited to the Victron current draw to 10amps.  That and the 13-4amps that the water-maker draws will put an appropriate load on the generator.   Note: it is likely that the Victron will regularly be fully utilizing this limit because what ever I am not using for 230a current will be allocated to charge the batteries, up to the 70amp limit for the Victron for charging. 
    2. When I am on Shore power I have set a very conservative 10a limit on the 16amp shore power circuit but I will actually be able to provide more current to the 230 amp panel than I previously would on shore power with out the Victron.   This is achieved through the Victron Power Assist capability.  When the 230v AC demand on the main panel exceeds the 10amp limit on the current input, the inverter will make up the shortage using the Inverter to draw from the battery.   The documented examples from Victron specifically shows an example of a 10a limit on the input current being supplemented with 10amps from the inverter to provide 20amps total AC current out.    This should be sufficient for our needs as most of our higher current draws on the AC side are only for short duration, i.e. hot water kettle for 1-2 minutes, 3-5 minutes to heat water for the washing machine or dishwasher, or short bursts for the micro-wave. 
  8. Operational considerations:
    1. Day in and day out we are already trained to look up at the 230v Current meter before we turn anything on the 230v panel, and shut something off if necessary.  Regarding the water heater, we currently do not leave it on when on Shore Power.  We will turn it on for an hour in the morning and that is sufficient for the whole day.
    2. Regarding the generator operation and water-maker:  I am always in the engine room before and after running the generator / water-make; to set the flush valves prior to the water-maker run and after the water-maker run to flush the membranes and check that everything is ok.  Therefore having the breakers for the watermaker and secondary charger in the engine room do not add any inconvenience to my existing routing for running generator/water-maker.
    3. Important!  The Victron Multi-Plus AC current frequency out will default to 50Hz when on the inverter, but it will switch to match the frequency of any input AC source.  So when running the generator it will be 50Hz, however, when on 60Hz Shore Power then the AC output to the main panel will be 60Hz.

 

 

Please let me know your feedback, challenges, questions on this, as I want to get it right the first time and I know I am not the first down this road and there are learnings to be shared.

 

Thanks and Regards,  Daniel and Lori Carlson on SM#387, sv-BeBe, currently at Shelter Bay Marina, Panama

 

 

 

 

 

 



--
Colin Streeter
0411 016 445

Re: Maramu 46 Vs Santorin engine compartment

amelforme
 

Although the 46’-48’ Maramu did have a door to give privacy to the aft cabin, I have yet to see a Maramu with a watertight door in the aft cabin.  We all know that Amel was extremely resistant to changes and  modifications from standard specification, but sometimes some leniency was shown to legacy clients returning for their second or third new Amel boat, so perhaps there are some out there with a watertight for the aft cabin at the legacy buyers insistence.  Again , I have never seen one at the shipyard nor on  any of the very many Maramus I have resold.

 

Have Fun With Your Amel, Joel        

 

       JOEL F. POTTER-CRUISING YACHT SPECIALIST~L.L.C.

                                           THE  EXPERIENCED AMEL GUY

UNSURPASSED AMEL MARKETING EXPERIENCE AND PRODUCT KNOWLEDGE

                                   Office 954-462-5869  Cell 954-812-2485

 

 

 

From: main@AmelYachtOwners.groups.io <main@AmelYachtOwners.groups.io> On Behalf Of Giorgio Ardrizzi
Sent: Sunday, December 8, 2019 7:51 AM
To: main@amelyachtowners.groups.io
Subject: Re: [AmelYachtOwners] Maramu 46 Vs Santorin engine compartment

 

In the Maramu the space in the engine room is smaller, in favor of a huge locker in the cockpit.

All Maramu have a watertight door that close the aft cabin.

 

Giorgio Ardrizzi

Saudade III - Sharki #1

Chaguaramas bay Trinidad

 

Il Dom 8 Dic 2019, 08:14 Daniel Alexander Thompson <Thompson.Xander@...> ha scritto:

Hello

Might anybody he kind enough to answer my questions below?

Is the Maramu 46 engine compartment larger than the Santorin's ?

Were any Maramus built with a watertight aft cabin door/compartment?

Best regards

Re: Maramu 46 Vs Santorin engine compartment

David Wallace
 

Additionally, the aft shower drains directly to the engine room so flooding of the aft cabin could occur unless a valve was installed to be able to shut off that ingress point.

Dave Wallace
sv Air Ops
Maramu #104


On Dec 8, 2019, at 3:47 PM, amelforme <jfpottercys@...> wrote:

Although the 46’-48’ Maramu did have a door to give privacy to the aft cabin, I have yet to see a Maramu with a watertight door in the aft cabin.  We all know that Amel was extremely resistant to changes and  modifications from standard specification, but sometimes some leniency was shown to legacy clients returning for their second of third new Amel boat, so perhaps there are some out there with a watertight for the aft cabin at the legacy buyers insistence.  Again , I have never seen one at the shipyard nor on the very many Maramus I have resold.

 

Have Fun With Your Amel, Joel        

 

       JOEL F. POTTER-CRUISING YACHT SPECIALIST~L.L.C.

                                           THE  EXPERIENCED AMEL GUY

UNSURPASSED AMEL MARKETING EXPERIENCE AND PRODUCT KNOWLEDGE

                                   Office 954-462-5869  Cell 954-812-2485

 

 

 

From: main@AmelYachtOwners.groups.io <main@AmelYachtOwners.groups.io> On Behalf Of Giorgio Ardrizzi
Sent: Sunday, December 8, 2019 7:51 AM
To: main@amelyachtowners.groups.io
Subject: Re: [AmelYachtOwners] Maramu 46 Vs Santorin engine compartment

 

In the Maramu the space in the engine room is smaller, in favor of a huge locker in the cockpit.

All Maramu have a watertight door that close the aft cabin.

 

Giorgio Ardrizzi

Saudade III - Sharki #1

Chaguaramas bay Trinidad

 

Il Dom 8 Dic 2019, 08:14 Daniel Alexander Thompson <Thompson.Xander@...> ha scritto:

Hello

Might anybody he kind enough to answer my questions below?

Is the Maramu 46 engine compartment larger than the Santorin's ?

Were any Maramus built with a watertight aft cabin door/compartment?

Best regards

Re: Maramu 46 Vs Santorin engine compartment

amelforme
 

Although the 46’-48’ Maramu did have a door to give privacy to the aft cabin, I have yet to see a Maramu with a watertight door in the aft cabin.  We all know that Amel was extremely resistant to changes and  modifications from standard specification, but sometimes some leniency was shown to legacy clients returning for their second of third new Amel boat, so perhaps there are some out there with a watertight for the aft cabin at the legacy buyers insistence.  Again , I have never seen one at the shipyard nor on the very many Maramus I have resold.

 

Have Fun With Your Amel, Joel        

 

       JOEL F. POTTER-CRUISING YACHT SPECIALIST~L.L.C.

                                           THE  EXPERIENCED AMEL GUY

UNSURPASSED AMEL MARKETING EXPERIENCE AND PRODUCT KNOWLEDGE

                                   Office 954-462-5869  Cell 954-812-2485

 

 

 

From: main@AmelYachtOwners.groups.io <main@AmelYachtOwners.groups.io> On Behalf Of Giorgio Ardrizzi
Sent: Sunday, December 8, 2019 7:51 AM
To: main@amelyachtowners.groups.io
Subject: Re: [AmelYachtOwners] Maramu 46 Vs Santorin engine compartment

 

In the Maramu the space in the engine room is smaller, in favor of a huge locker in the cockpit.

All Maramu have a watertight door that close the aft cabin.

 

Giorgio Ardrizzi

Saudade III - Sharki #1

Chaguaramas bay Trinidad

 

Il Dom 8 Dic 2019, 08:14 Daniel Alexander Thompson <Thompson.Xander@...> ha scritto:

Hello

Might anybody he kind enough to answer my questions below?

Is the Maramu 46 engine compartment larger than the Santorin's ?

Were any Maramus built with a watertight aft cabin door/compartment?

Best regards

How to make the most of Victron Multi-Plus Inverter/Charger on SM#387

Dan Carlson
 

Hello all,  I have been thinking through the best way to install a Victron Multi-Plus Inverter/Charger on SM#387.   I am specifically looking at the 3000w/70a/24v/16a model.   I have seen several previous posts that have discussed aspects of installing Victron Inverter/Chargers.  These previous posts have included discussion of installing switches between sources of supply to the 230v panel, or dividing the 230v panel between the inverter supply and direct supply from shore or inverter…   I am considering the approach diagramed roughly in the attached photo and described below.  Please let me know your feedback, questions or concerns.    

 

A very brief summary of the he Victron Multi-plus: It will take 230v power from shore or generator (45-65Hz) as well as 24v power from a battery bank to provide 230v power for the boat.   The 16a model is limited to 16a current load.  From this it can provide up to 3000a from the inverter, with or with-out shore power.  Whenever there is excess 230v supply over housed demand for 230v, the inverter will switch to a charger mode to put energy back into the battery bank.   On SM#387 this is great for most of our needs as we are currently restricted to 16a on the Shore power already.   However; we do have one significant conflict for power demand and that is the 230v water-maker which draws approx. 13-14Amps.  

 

To best solve for this and to minimize the requirement for different switches I would like to connect the output from the Victron directly to the 230v panel to provide consistent ac power for the boat when whether on battery, shore power or generator.    And to solve the current demand needs by removing the water-maker and both of the battery charging breakers from the existing 230 panel.  See notes below for further explanations.

 

Design notes to accompany attached diagram: 

  1. This approach is based on the current 16a system/limit on Shore Power, the current Onan 7MDKAV generator and the current AMEL switch box that automatically switches between Shore or Generator as AC source.   I think that I will add a 16a breaker on the shore power as a good precaution as I work on my overall wiring.
  2. I will need to add a new breaker box, or perhaps I can use the existing breaker box that was used for the Pro-Sine 1800w inverter that currently supplies power to the boat. This is where I would have the breakers for the water-maker and also for the secondary battery charger (perhaps a Sterling 24v/30a charger).   This will be supplied directly from the AMEL switching relay box.
  3. This would allow me to re-move the wires for the water-maker and the secondary charger from the main 230v panel.  
  4. The breaker the 100a charger will also be removed from the 230v panel, and new wire will be added directly from the Amel switch to the Victron Inverter (with the appropriate fuses/breakers).
  5. The AC output from the Victron Multi-Plus inverter directly to the 230v panel  (I need to consider changing the existing 30a breaker on the main panel to based on the overall limit from the Victron.)
  6. Supply the battery power to the Victron Multi-plus from the existing cable that supplied the 100a charger (This looks like a 50mm2 cable, which is sufficient for up to 5meter run).
  7. Configuration:   The Victron Multi-Plus has a Power Control setting that sets a limit the current that it will draw on the AC input source.   I could set this to a max of 10amps.  The rationale for this is:
    1. When I am running the generator and I turn on the water-maker I have already limited to the Victron current draw to 10amps.  That and the 13-4amps that the water-maker draws will put an appropriate load on the generator.   Note: it is likely that the Victron will regularly be fully utilizing this limit because what ever I am not using for 230a current will be allocated to charge the batteries, up to the 70amp limit for the Victron for charging. 
    2. When I am on Shore power I have set a very conservative 10a limit on the 16amp shore power circuit but I will actually be able to provide more current to the 230 amp panel than I previously would on shore power with out the Victron.   This is achieved through the Victron Power Assist capability.  When the 230v AC demand on the main panel exceeds the 10amp limit on the current input, the inverter will make up the shortage using the Inverter to draw from the battery.   The documented examples from Victron specifically shows an example of a 10a limit on the input current being supplemented with 10amps from the inverter to provide 20amps total AC current out.    This should be sufficient for our needs as most of our higher current draws on the AC side are only for short duration, i.e. hot water kettle for 1-2 minutes, 3-5 minutes to heat water for the washing machine or dishwasher, or short bursts for the micro-wave. 
  8. Operational considerations:
    1. Day in and day out we are already trained to look up at the 230v Current meter before we turn anything on the 230v panel, and shut something off if necessary.  Regarding the water heater, we currently do not leave it on when on Shore Power.  We will turn it on for an hour in the morning and that is sufficient for the whole day.
    2. Regarding the generator operation and water-maker:  I am always in the engine room before and after running the generator / water-make; to set the flush valves prior to the water-maker run and after the water-maker run to flush the membranes and check that everything is ok.  Therefore having the breakers for the watermaker and secondary charger in the engine room do not add any inconvenience to my existing routing for running generator/water-maker.
    3. Important!  The Victron Multi-Plus AC current frequency out will default to 50Hz when on the inverter, but it will switch to match the frequency of any input AC source.  So when running the generator it will be 50Hz, however, when on 60Hz Shore Power then the AC output to the main panel will be 60Hz.

 

 

Please let me know your feedback, challenges, questions on this, as I want to get it right the first time and I know I am not the first down this road and there are learnings to be shared.

 

Thanks and Regards,  Daniel and Lori Carlson on SM#387, sv-BeBe, currently at Shelter Bay Marina, Panama

 

 

 

 

 

 

Re: Maramu 46 Vs Santorin engine compartment

Giorgio Ardrizzi
 

In the Maramu the space in the engine room is smaller, in favor of a huge locker in the cockpit.
All Maramu have a watertight door that close the aft cabin.

Giorgio Ardrizzi
Saudade III - Sharki #1
Chaguaramas bay Trinidad


Il Dom 8 Dic 2019, 08:14 Daniel Alexander Thompson <Thompson.Xander@...> ha scritto:
Hello

Might anybody he kind enough to answer my questions below?

Is the Maramu 46 engine compartment larger than the Santorin's ?

Were any Maramus built with a watertight aft cabin door/compartment?

Best regards

Maramu 46 Vs Santorin engine compartment

Daniel Alexander Thompson
 

Hello

Might anybody he kind enough to answer my questions below?

Is the Maramu 46 engine compartment larger than the Santorin's ?

Were any Maramus built with a watertight aft cabin door/compartment?

Best regards

Re: AMFA bilge pump rebuild kit

Sv Garulfo
 

Thanks Craig, 

I think i found it (at least another thread where you quoted it). 
I will have a look to see what could be done.

Cheers
Thomas

On Sat, 7 Dec 2019 at 04:17, Craig Briggs SN 68 Sangaris via Groups.Io <sangaris=aol.com@groups.io> wrote:
Hi Thomas,
Definitely not broken beyond repair. If, as Bill suggests, you can get a new plastic gear that would be super.  If not, you can actually repair the old one quite easily - search for my old post on the subject, but basically, separate the outer toothed part from the inner ring, rotate the toothed part on reassembly so you've spanned all the inner breaks. Then drill holes in the valleys of the gear on each side of the breaks, thru the inner ring and put "pins" (finishing nails will do) thru the holes. You might wash it in mineral spirits first and add some glue to the brew. I did this repair on mine maybe 12 years ago or so and it its still going strong.
Cheers, Craig

Re: Dripless shaft seal

James Alton
 

Wade,

   I have also seen exhaust hose used for stuffing boxes and so far have not seen a failure.   Perhaps the exhaust hose is being used by yards since they tend to have that hose on hand whereas the proper hose is becoming a bit of a specialty item?  Like yourself I feel that this is a critical hole in the boat so I was glad to spend a few extra dollars to get the much heavier Algonquin hose.  You could perhaps write to Shields and ask about the suitability of using the exhaust hose in this application.  I can tell you that the old hose that I removed on my Maramu was also very heavy wall.

Best of luck,

James
SV Sueno
Maramu #220
Preveza, Greece


On Dec 7, 2019, at 10:52 AM, Wade Shikoski via Groups.Io <n2everythg@...> wrote:

Thanks James. I Will be sure to change it out. I wondered about that but when I looked up stuffing boxes in the Paxton catalog to confirm the yards recommendation I saw at least one stuffing box that was sold with exhaust hose. Figured that confirmed the yard recommendation was ok. 
I will change it out. Rather go with more insurance than less in that critical ‘hole in the boat’

Re: Dripless shaft seal

James Alton
 

Wade,

  If the cutlass bearings were made accurately it could matter a little but if the shaft feels tight and is not rattling then I would not worry about it.  In my experience there is sometimes more than 3 thou variation in the new bearings I buy,  not sure why but put two new bearings on the same shaft and one is likely to be tighter than the other.   Interestingly my boat came with a spare cutlass bearing and it was also a fractional size yet the shaft measures 35mm exactly so I am not 100% sure of what bearing is actually in my boat now.   

James

On Dec 7, 2019, at 11:05 AM, Wade Shikoski via Groups.Io <n2everythg@...> wrote:

Re: cutlass. - I don’t know if the shaft was ever changed. But 1 3/8” = 1.375” and 35mm = 1.37795. 
Shaft is tight and does not wiggle side to side or up and down. I wonder if the less than 3 thousandths of an inch would really matter? I would think that much would wear off the bearing within a hundred hrs of engine time anyway?

thanks for clarifying the exact correct dimensions though. 

Re: Dripless shaft seal

Wade Shikoski
 

Re: cutlass. - I don’t know if the shaft was ever changed. But 1 3/8” = 1.375” and 35mm = 1.37795. 
Shaft is tight and does not wiggle side to side or up and down. I wonder if the less than 3 thousandths of an inch would really matter? I would think that much would wear off the bearing within a hundred hrs of engine time anyway?

thanks for clarifying the exact correct dimensions though. 

Re: Dripless shaft seal

Wade Shikoski
 

Thanks James. I Will be sure to change it out. I wondered about that but when I looked up stuffing boxes in the Paxton catalog to confirm the yards recommendation I saw at least one stuffing box that was sold with exhaust hose. Figured that confirmed the yard recommendation was ok. 
I will change it out. Rather go with more insurance than less in that critical ‘hole in the boat’

Re: Dripless shaft seal

James Alton
 

Wade,

   The exhaust hose is good for it’s intended application and but it is not as strong as the much thicker 5 ply hose sold specifically for stuffing boxes.  The hose that I use is by Buck Algonquin and has about a 3/8” wall thickness. 

    I am pretty sure that my Maramu has a 35mm shaft but perhaps yours was changed?

Best,

James
SV Sueno
Maramu #220

On Dec 7, 2019, at 9:37 AM, Wade Shikoski via Groups.Io <n2everythg@...> wrote:

<D89A4BCB-F2CD-4214-9070-E3709B9CD14A.jpeg><36BEFD13-A894-46C5-9423-AF1D842D20B4.jpeg>Just did this replacement on 83 maramu. Used a Johnson duramax size 1 7/8”x 1 3/8x 5 1/2” bearing. Replaced stuffing box hose with exhaust hose as per yard recommendation. 

Re: AMFA bilge pump rebuild kit

Craig & Katherine Briggs SN 68 Sangaris Tropic Isle Harbor, FL
 

Hi Thomas,
Definitely not broken beyond repair. If, as Bill suggests, you can get a new plastic gear that would be super.  If not, you can actually repair the old one quite easily - search for my old post on the subject, but basically, separate the outer toothed part from the inner ring, rotate the toothed part on reassembly so you've spanned all the inner breaks. Then drill holes in the valleys of the gear on each side of the breaks, thru the inner ring and put "pins" (finishing nails will do) thru the holes. You might wash it in mineral spirits first and add some glue to the brew. I did this repair on mine maybe 12 years ago or so and it its still going strong.
Cheers, Craig

Re: Dripless shaft seal

Wade Shikoski
 

Just did this replacement on 83 maramu. Used a Johnson duramax size 1 7/8”x 1 3/8x 5 1/2” bearing. Replaced stuffing box hose with exhaust hose as per yard recommendation. 

Re: Dripless shaft seal

Arlo
 

Hello all, thanks for all the thoughts and recommendations. I am still doing my research, but for those Maramu and mango owners out there does anyone know what Amel used as OEM equipment for the shaft seal? Also the boat is in the water (we get hauled on the 16th of Dec) so I will likely order replacement parts this coming week...anyone replace their cutless bearing in their Mango or Maramu yet that can share any info?

Re: “Default” anchor arrangement on an Amel 54

Arno Luijten
 

Hi S&T,

Somewhat related to this topic. We have just thrown out the WASI anchor because of the poor fit on the bowroller. It has been replaced by a (second hand) Spade 35kg. Next to the original Delta secondary anchor this fits beautifully. The Spade fits perfect on the bowroller, no additional rollers needed and it is self launching. I also replaced the swivels with the Mantus swivels, very well designed as opposed to the WASI swivel that has the most stupid grub-screws (to lock the main bolts) you can imagine. Removal by hacksaw...
Just had the first anchor experience with the Spade. Immediate holding and 20+ windgusts had no effect. Too early to tell of course but first impressions are excellent.

Arno Luijten
SV Luna,
A54-121

(I’m not sure why the picture is upside down, seems a forum software glitch)
 

Re: Super Maramu vs. Super Maramu 200our fridge is

Germain Jean-Pierre
 

Hello M & A,

We’ve done well but we live aboard so we wanted a modernised SM2K equivalent.  (No dishwasher… thank goodness)

For instance, we have 2 AP’s, one electric on the wheel hub and a hydraulic one on the bell crank to the rudder; this was done to exacerbate the problem of steering gear failure.  We have also dismantled the rack and pinion steering and there is little wear on the racks themselves.  I attribute this to the hydraulic AP which is far less brutal than the electric unit… seems like the LECCY uses a 0 or a 1….

We are pleased with all our work.. and the changes we had to make following the “bodges” in Turkey.  Part of it is my fault as I was still working in London and could not physically oversee the works…

Sail faster you are at least 10000NM behind us.  BTW, NZ is a superb country; our second year here.

Kind regards


Jean-Pierre Germain, SY Eleuthera, SM 007, Opua, NZ



On 7 Dec 2019, at 19:46, Mohammad Shirloo <mshirloo@...> wrote:

Hi J.P.;
 
Glad to see you have worked out the bugs and have your Amel where you want her. I know you spent a lot of time and energy putting in all the upgrades. Must now be very proud of her. You guys are moving much faster than us. Maybe we’ll catch up somewhere again.
 
Happy Sailing;
 
 
Mohammad and Aty
B&B Kokomo
AMEL 54 #099
 
From: main@AmelYachtOwners.groups.io <main@AmelYachtOwners.groups.io> On Behalf Of Germain Jean-Pierre via Groups.Io
Sent: Friday, December 06, 2019 6:32 PM
To: main@amelyachtowners.groups.io
Subject: Re: [AmelYachtOwners] Super Maramu vs. Super Maramu 200our fridge is
 
Hello Mark,
 
I concur with some of your thoughts but... 
- our fridge is a drawer type , keel cooled from Frigoboat. 185 litres. Great upgrade
 
- AC is now Webasto BlueCool 27 S. Good kit too
- floor boards are as you have.. never had a problem in even the most sporty conditions 
- full size washer in place of wet locker. Tons of browny points here
- galley refurbished in white Corian ... more browny points
 
Like you, it was not budget. But after full refit, our SM 007 is better than any SM2K and much newer in every point you might consider..unless the owner is as fussy as I. 
 
Kind regards,
 
Jean-Pierre Germain, SY Eleuthera, SM 007, NZ

 



On 5/12/2019, at 1:42 PM, CW Bill Rouse <brouse@...> wrote:


There isn't a simple answer because some of the features of the SM2k were introduced before the SM2k, and later SM2ks had some additional changes and features.
 
Several years ago, I spent considerable time and effort in an attempt to answer your question and found it is impossible to answer, especially if you need to be 100% accurate and complete to the level of component install locations. You will find with each attempt to accomplish this, there will be someone, correctly stating, yes, but you didn't list.....
 

If you are looking to buy a SM, the SM2k will be your best  choice, however, if your budget limits selecting the SM2k, the SM is a good solution. Like Dan said, look at some. 

Best,

CW Bill Rouse
Amel Owners Yacht School - www.AmelOwnersYachtSchool.com
720 Winnie St
Galveston Island, TX 77550
+1(832) 380-4970
 
On Wed, Dec 4, 2019, 6:14 PM Dan Carlson <carlsdan61@...> wrote:
Honestly Staten, just go look at the boats and decide what is important to you! Other people's opinions will be all over the place based on goals, preferences and budget. The SM is newer, bigger and has more amenities and storage... Both will take you safely around the world.  What are you looking for in a boat?
 
Best, Daniel Carlson on sv BeBe, SM#387

 

On Wed, Dec 4, 2019, 6:53 PM Staten via Groups.Io <vls43402=yahoo.com@groups.io wrote:
Thanks.  But that discussion appears to only concern the Mango and a version of the Super Maramu.  Im not finding a discussion of the 2000 model Super Maramu and prior versions.  


Re: Super Maramu vs. Super Maramu 200our fridge is

Mohammad Shirloo
 

Hi J.P.;

 

Glad to see you have worked out the bugs and have your Amel where you want her. I know you spent a lot of time and energy putting in all the upgrades. Must now be very proud of her. You guys are moving much faster than us. Maybe we’ll catch up somewhere again.

 

Happy Sailing;

 

 

Mohammad and Aty

B&B Kokomo

AMEL 54 #099

 

From: main@AmelYachtOwners.groups.io <main@AmelYachtOwners.groups.io> On Behalf Of Germain Jean-Pierre via Groups.Io
Sent: Friday, December 06, 2019 6:32 PM
To: main@amelyachtowners.groups.io
Subject: Re: [AmelYachtOwners] Super Maramu vs. Super Maramu 200our fridge is

 

Hello Mark,

 

I concur with some of your thoughts but... 

- our fridge is a drawer type , keel cooled from Frigoboat. 185 litres. Great upgrade

 

- AC is now Webasto BlueCool 27 S. Good kit too

- floor boards are as you have.. never had a problem in even the most sporty conditions 

- full size washer in place of wet locker. Tons of browny points here

- galley refurbished in white Corian ... more browny points

 

Like you, it was not budget. But after full refit, our SM 007 is better than any SM2K and much newer in every point you might consider..unless the owner is as fussy as I. 

 

Kind regards,

 

Jean-Pierre Germain, SY Eleuthera, SM 007, NZ

 



On 5/12/2019, at 1:42 PM, CW Bill Rouse <brouse@...> wrote:



There isn't a simple answer because some of the features of the SM2k were introduced before the SM2k, and later SM2ks had some additional changes and features.

 

Several years ago, I spent considerable time and effort in an attempt to answer your question and found it is impossible to answer, especially if you need to be 100% accurate and complete to the level of component install locations. You will find with each attempt to accomplish this, there will be someone, correctly stating, yes, but you didn't list.....

 

If you are looking to buy a SM, the SM2k will be your best  choice, however, if your budget limits selecting the SM2k, the SM is a good solution. Like Dan said, look at some. 

Best,

CW Bill Rouse
Amel Owners Yacht School - www.AmelOwnersYachtSchool.com
720 Winnie St
Galveston Island, TX 77550
+1(832) 380-4970

 

On Wed, Dec 4, 2019, 6:14 PM Dan Carlson <carlsdan61@...> wrote:

Honestly Staten, just go look at the boats and decide what is important to you! Other people's opinions will be all over the place based on goals, preferences and budget. The SM is newer, bigger and has more amenities and storage... Both will take you safely around the world.  What are you looking for in a boat?

 

Best, Daniel Carlson on sv BeBe, SM#387

 

On Wed, Dec 4, 2019, 6:53 PM Staten via Groups.Io <vls43402=yahoo.com@groups.io wrote:

Thanks.  But that discussion appears to only concern the Mango and a version of the Super Maramu.  Im not finding a discussion of the 2000 model Super Maramu and prior versions.