Re: Important - Amel 54 and any Electrical Emergency
#IMPORTANT
Hi Dean,
Are you sure the schema in the handbook is correct? Mine is not. The batteries are shown in two different pages, both of them are incorrect. One is the one that shows both the 12 v and the 24 v battery, this one is really incorrect, the other shows the 24 volt circuit with the batteries, this one is more accurate but still wrong. Arno, SV Luna A54-121
|
|
Re: Any SM owners use a Beta engine??
Bill Fletcher
I bought a Beta marine 60 six years ago and it has been the best purchase I have made for the boat. It has been totally reliable and easy to work on. Two options I had were I had the remote oil filter installed. The oil filer would be very difficult to change and messy without it. I sent my existing high amperage alternator to the factory to be installed They modified my alternator to a serpentine belt and did a great job. This saved hours of work for the installers and it wasn’t very expensive. Of course you would do the 75 horsepower as you are a SM I am only a MARAMU but am very happy with it. I have traced from the states to New Zealand and so far every time I turn the key it just goes. Bill Fletcher MARAMU 179
On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 5:35 PM Davi Rozgonyi <davi.rozgonyi@...> wrote: Ciao y'all.... Davi here on SM#56, Wake. So I've been trying to have my Perkins Prima M80T rebuilt for some months now with disappointing results. Constant gray/white smoke and spitting oil or diesel on the water, eating a liter of oil every 50 hours or so. Even after twice having engine removed, pistons checked, head checked, FI pump rebuilt, injectors tested, new turbo installed.... stumped. Two different mechanics. The first I can now say botched the job, but the second is pretty brilliant and he is at the point where he wants to pull the whole thing to recheck the other work done starting at the pistons again.
|
|
locked
Re: AMEL 55
I think the 55 is a great Amel. Of course, I feel the SM and 54 are great Amels. Neither of these 3 Amels are for everyone. And compared side-by-side there are significant differences as there are in all sailing yachts made over a 34 year period of time. Many things change in 30+ years, especially the market and what the market demands. Amel is in the business of manufacturing yachts. A 34 year old design may appeal to some people today, but it is not what the market is looking for. I believe there was a bit of genius with Amel's introduction of the Amel 50. Based on sales, this is exactly what the market wanted from Amel. Everyone of us has a stake in Amel's success. Also, you should notice that our main page (AmelYachtOwnersGroup.com) reads, in part: This Group frowns on commercial postings, however we encourage postings which will genuinely help Amel owners source needed parts and services. We encourage you to support the Amel brand and be respectful to the brand in your postings. Care should be taken to not post anything that will be offensive to any Group Member. Please refrain from political issues, rude, or inappropriate language.
On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 3:16 PM Joerg Esdorn via Groups.Io <jhe1313=yahoo.com@groups.io> wrote: Hi, I’ve owned a 55 for 3 years now. I disagree with just about everything that Davi says about the 55. I wont put up a post trashing the Sm. Let me say just one thing. The 55 is a terrific further development of the 54 and you get what you pay for, and then some.
|
|
Re: Important - Amel 54 and any Electrical Emergency
#IMPORTANT
Another important point to note is that Solar regulators should preferably be connected to the ‘panel side’ of the battery isolator switches. (For the same reasons). However, this means that battery isolator switches must be left on when solar charging is wanted, eg during wintering. For this reason, I suspect many folks will connect the solar regulator to the battery side. Noting of course that the solar system should always incorporate breakers on the panel and battery side of the regulator.
All interesting issues to consider when briefing crew etc. Dean
|
|
locked
Re: AMEL 55
Joerg Esdorn
Hi, I’ve owned a 55 for 3 years now. I disagree with just about everything that Davi says about the 55. I wont put up a post trashing the Sm. Let me say just one thing. The 55 is a terrific further development of the 54 and you get what you pay for, and then some.
|
|
Re: Important - Amel 54 and any Electrical Emergency
#IMPORTANT
Thanks for promulgating that warning Bill, a timely reminder to all.
What you describe is exactly how my 54 #154 is configured. It is also documented as such in the circuit schematics in the owner’s manual. Im pretty sure all of my previous boats were also configured in this way. I suppose “battery isolation switches’ do exactly as their name implies - they isolate the batteries. Everything else stays connected together. Best regards Dean SY Stella A54-154 A Coruña
|
|
Important - Amel 54 and any Electrical Emergency
#IMPORTANT
All,
I have always recommended, if an Electrical Emergency happens aboard your Amel, the Main Battery Switches should be immediately turned OFF (opened). I have also urged owners to discuss this with crew and especially guests.
Something has come to my attention that surprised me. The 24 volt alternator on Amel 54s, and possibly other Amels, is wired to the 24 Volt Panel side of the Main Battery Switches. This means, if engine is running and you turn OFF the Main Battery Switches, all of the 24 volt devices will continue to get 24 volt power because the 24 volt alternator is generating power and is connected to the 24 volt panel side of the Main Battery Switches. When this recently happened to a client, I was also surprised that the Volvo D3 continued to run with the Main Battery Switches OFF because the D3 needs 12 volts to run. I suspect the D3 was getting current to run from its 12 volt alternator, but that surprises me also.
This is really important that you understand the Main Battery Switches will disconnect the batteries, but not the 24 volt alternator. In the case of the Amel 54, and possibly other Amels, to turn OFF 24 volt power, the Volvo D3 must be OFF as well as the the Main Battery Switches set to OFF.
I am sure that we all would like to know about other model Amels. I do not recommend turning off the switches with the engine running, but rather tracing the wiring.
|
|
Re: Batteries: single failed battery in the house bank, impact for other batteries
I am not sure, and I believe you believe the same. With thousands of miles ahead of you and 3+ year old battery bank, I would consider changing the entire house bank, especially since getting 3-4 years is average for high-use Amels. Good on the lead acid start battery. When troubleshooting the Onan, I believe the weak point is the cable that runs inside from the negative connection post to the battery side of the Negative start solenoid. The connection post where cables from the battery switches connect is located on the left side, facing, about half way down. I believe you can easily bypass this undersized cable by connecting a jumper from that connection post to the battery side of the negative start solenoid. You could also test the negative start solenoid by connecting that jumper cable to the starter side of the negative solenoid. 1 jumper cable can be used to test two items. If the problem turns out to be the negative start solenoid, don't leave that jumper on the starter side of the solenoid permanently. Best, CW Bill Rouse Yacht School - Supporting Amel Owners www.YachtSchool.us 720 Winnie St Galveston Island, TX 77550 +1(832) 380-4970
On Sun, May 26, 2019, 11:24 AM David Vogel <david.vogel@...> wrote: Greetings all,
|
|
Re: "heavier lower stays than the original"
Hi Bill,
About the running backstay, that is exactly my setup. When not in use the stay is routed via a snapshackle with a short piece of string attached to the scepter next to the cap-shroud stay. From the shackle it goes to a block attached to the same point as the Genua-sheet turning block. At the end of the backstay there is a knot so the line cannot escape the block. The snapshacke position is used to take up the slack in the backstay so the line does not get in the way When in use the secondary winch on the windward side is free so you can use it to tension the windward running backstay after you release the snapshacke that sits halfway the backstay. Imagine the whole setup as a triangle with one square corner. One corner is at the spreader, one at the snapshackle and one at the turning block. When not in use the backstay follows the two legs that share the square corner, when it is in use it follows the leg from the spreader to the block. As this distance is much shorter the tail of the backstay line is long enough to attach to the secondary winch. Arno SV Luna, A54-121
|
|
Re: Volvo D3-110 belt changes
It seems there are different belt configurations out there. A mechanic in St. Martin assumed that the three aggregats combined put to much stress on the belt. I also heard that AMEL originally had even more powerful 24V alternators installed, but had to change this because of that problem.
|
|
Batteries: single failed battery in the house bank, impact for other batteries
David Vogel
Greetings all,
Whilst trouble-shooting an unserviceable ONAN (failure to crank), I checked out the health of the 105Ah 800CCA AGM start battery (good), and house-bank (12x105Ah AGMs). Start and house batteries were all AGM, same model and date-of-install (Sep'16). All tested OK, with the exception of one battery in the house bank, which failed the State-of-Charge test with an Open-Circuit-Voltage (OCV) of 11.00V (as measured, so no surprises here), unstable; and failed State-of-Health of CCA of 35.0A). The other battery in the pair containing the failed battery surprisingly tested OK, with SoC 12.72V [92%] and SoH CCA of 642A [91%]. As an interim step, whilst considering broader options ... ... I replaced the good start-battery with a 100Ah/700CCA flooded lead-acid battery; removed the failed AGM battery from the house bank, and replaced it with the 'good' AGM start battery. The performance of the house battery bank immediately improved, I guess due to the absence of the parasitic load of the failed battery. However, concerned about the remaining battery in the new pair contained the failed battery, I have been keeping a close eye on the charge volts, current, and temps of all batteries. 24 hours after the swap-out/in, during the second charge cycle, I noted high charging current to the new battery-pair containing the old-start battery. The smart-charger was ordering ~150Amps from the 175A/24V Leece-Neville (normal for the start-of-charge-cycle) - 5 battery-pairs were accepting about 20Amps each (OK and as expected, at ~20% of the '20-hour rate' of 105Ah), but the 'at risk' pair was accepting 40 to 50Amps. Temps for the 5 'good' pairs were about 1ºC above ambient and stable; but the temp of the questionable pair was ambient +2ºC and rising. I stopped the charge cycle after 30 minutes; and isolated the questionable pair from the house-bank by removing the bridging strap between the batteries in the pair. Shortly after the cessation of the interrupted charge cycle, the temperature of the high-current pair peaked at 36.5ºC (ambient other batteries +2.5ºC). I am seeking clarification regarding: Is is likely that the remaining battery from the 'old pair' had already suffered irreversible damage (such as an internal short), thereby reducing internal resistance, thereby accepting a higher charge (than the other 'good' battery pairs). On the basis of temperature alone , I do not think I have suffered temperature-related damage to the old start battery. However: Question - is it likely that 30-minutes of charge at twice the maximum recommend bulk/absorption current charge-rate has resulted in permanent damage to the previously 'good' start-battery? This discussion shared for the learning, and also for the benefit of trouble-shooting by other unfortunates who may in future find themselves in a similar predicament. Thanks in anticipation ... David SM#396/Perigee On anchor, Brisas, Pacific side of Panama Departure for the Marquesas pending the return of the ONAN to service Diagnostic tools: Magneti Marelli BT002 Battery Tester; FLIR TG165 Spot Thermal Camera; Voltcraft VC-595OLED Digital Clamp Multimeter. Note: the OLED display on the Voltcraft multimeter is impossible to read in direct sunlight, so next time I would choose a model with a different type of display. Otherwise, this is a great tool, although I do not use the BlueTooth functionality.
|
|
Re: Any SM owners use a Beta engine??
James Alton
Davi,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Really sorry to hear about your engine woes and the disruption to your Med. cruising. Has your mechanic verified that the compression is up to spec. on all cylinders after the rebuild? I have a customer who installed a Beta 50 8 years ago and loves the engine, no issues. The Beta is based on the Kubota block. We had a Kubota tractor that was high time which gave excellent service, never opened the engine. Best of luck, James SV Sueno, Maramu #220
|
|
Re: Volvo D3-110 belt changes
Theo, do you know which model your D3 110 is? Is it model "H" or different?
On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 10:57 AM s/v Paloma <sailingpaloma1@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: Any SM owners use a Beta engine??
Dan Wilcox
Hi Davi, I just purchased a Beta 85 which should be delivered next week. I'm installing the CS version of the control panel today, and it looks like it will fit perfectly. I'm happy to share pictures if you would like, or let you know how the install goes over the next 3 weeks. So far I have been very happy working with Stan, the US dealer. Thanks, Dan Feierabend SM #86
On Sunday, May 26, 2019, 3:28:40 AM PDT, Gerhard Mueller via Groups.Io <carcode@...> wrote:
I am not shure if you also need to change the gearbox when changing the engine. Perhaps someone here has a hint. -- Gerhard Mueller Amel Sharki #60 Currently Kalamata, Greece
|
|
Re: Volvo D3-110 belt changes
On my Amel 50 with the Volvo D3-110 engine, the second alternator (Mastervolt 24V 110A, part number 48224110) is on a separate belt as the seawater pump. This is the way the engine came in a crate.
Theo s/v Paloma, Amel 50 #18
|
|
locked
Re: AMEL 55
Aldo Roldan
Keen observation on most of the issues noted by Davi. I moved from a SM2000 to a 55 four years ago. While it took me sometime to get used to the change and I missed the SM2000, (who doesn’t experience that after changing boats?), after four years, I am extremely pleased I made the move. Why? Overall a more livable, airy, brighter and a faster boat. Higher freeboard a powerful bowthruster, a true, real davitts, and a many other features. Storage? Gigantic lockers in the cockpit and bow. Regarding the stern lazarette, I am not exaggerating if I say that you could store your Dinghy fully inflated. In a friendly spirit, I say bring it on if you perceive other disadvantages ! I am sure I will have an answer that would please most.
On May 26, 2019, at 8:03 AM, Davi Rozgonyi <davi.rozgonyi@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: Wiring to aft head SM243
You win the "Head Lottery!"
On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 8:37 AM karkauai via Groups.Io <karkauai=yahoo.com@groups.io> wrote:
|
|
Re: Wiring to aft head SM243
Turns out I have a bad motor, a bad switch, and a bad connection between wire from switch to wire from motor. No wonder it doesn’t work! ;-)>
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Kent Robertson
On May 26, 2019, at 9:11 AM, CW Bill Rouse <brouse@...> wrote:
Kent, Your issue is most probably the switch. There is only one feed wire to the switch. On Sat, May 25, 2019 at 7:36 PM karkauai via Groups.Io <karkauai=yahoo.com@groups.io> wrote:
|
|
Genoa Fair Leads
Capt. Steve Bode <whatsup@...>
Hey, Group. What's the latest best answer on replacing the Genoa Fair Leads? My springs are broken, one wheel is chipped. Tried taking it apart, but can't figure out how to get the pin out of the center once the eye bolts are removed. Is that center bar screwed in? At $750 a piece online, I'm not jazzed about replacing the whole car. Replacement car without extra hardware needed to adapt to Amel lead system: Tags: Genoa Fair Lead, Genoa Track, Jib Car Lead, Jib fairlead, Genoa Fairlead, Foresail Track Steve Bode, Captain of Sailing Vessel Intention Currently Drydocked at ANT Yat Servis Bodrum Marina Teknik Servisler Neyzen Tevfik Cad. No. 5 48400 Bodrum, Mulga, Turkiye Amel Super Maramu #117 (1994) +1 415-710-6659 voice/text/whatsapp
|
|
Re: Engine room lining on Amel 54
Plasti Dip is also available on Amazon: https://www.amazon.com/Performix-11203-Multi-Purpose-Coating-Aerosol/dp/B0006SU3QW/ref=sr_1_3?keywords=Plasti%2BDip&qid=1558876598&s=gateway&sr=8-3&th=1 Please keep us posted as to how this works. Every 54 owner will be very interested.
On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 6:03 AM Martin Bevan <Martin.bevanhome@...> wrote: Thank you for all the responses about the engine room. I tried the plastic paint suggestion. Plasti Dip is available in the UK. It comes as a spray or brush on and there are the appropriate thinners and a primer for use on non-porous surfaces. It adheres well to the raw foam and 2-3 coats brushed on has given a tough surface. It is too early to say how well it will last. It certainly improves the appearance of the engine room, even just patching in.
|
|