Date   

Re: A54 Main Sail furling foil weak point

Scott SV Tengah
 

Great work, Arno.

Thomas (Garulfo) inspected my foil a few months ago and said it looked fine, but do you suggest A54 owners with the 35mm foil do this as a preventative measure?

Do you have the drawing for your reinforcement piece? 

Thanks!

--
Scott 
2007 A54 #69
SV Tengah
http://www.svtengah.com


Squeaky main hatch

Billy Newport
 

I suspect my squealing or squeaky hatch is actually the counter weight system for the hatch. Has everyone serviced that on a 55 or similar boat yet?

The hatch squeals a lot when raising and lowering it, its driving my wife nuts.

Billy
Amel 55#56


Re: A54 Main Sail furling foil weak point

Arno Luijten
 

Hi Bill,

Thanks for your additional remarks. In my case they kept the wider slot to insert the sail on the original foil and replaced only the part just below. I'm aware that Amel has this repair set but in my opinion it is not strong enough as the rod that goes inside the foil has a very hard job in resisting the torsion simply because of the surface area of the intersection that is way smaller then the size of the intersection of foil tube itself.
My foils are indeed 35mm and at the colllar it now measures a bit over 40 mm. Amazing to see what a new foil would set me back. I hope my solutions will keep me away from that headache.
As said before, the original repair on our foil was done quite poorly and I don't think Amel or its associates made that repair. Amel probably just supplied the parts.

Cheers,

Arno


Re: asymmetrical spinnaker

eric freedman
 

Hi Paolo,
We have been using this setup for 18 years without any problem
I like it a lot as it is in cleaner air and is very strong.
My gennaker is 1 1/2 oz material and we can fly it in 25 knots true.
When I first received Kimberlite we hooked up the gennaker to the anchor roller we wound up
bending part of it in about 20 knots. We had that sail up that time for 7 days straight in the trade winds from Europe.
Fair Winds
Eric
Kimberlite Amel Super Maramu #376

-----Original Message-----
From: main@AmelYachtOwners.groups.io On Behalf Of PAOLO CUNEO
Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2021 8:38 AM
To: main@amelyachtowners.groups.io
Subject: Re: [AmelYachtOwners] asymmetrical spinnaker

Eric,
Your solution of a short removable bowsprit is sound and well proven, no question about that, and I much respect it. Mine is only a matter of a personal preference, and I took a little bit of a chance trying something of which, at least in my area, there was no .previous reference. Fortunately everything went well and I’ll put some photos on my next post Bests Paolo SM 454 Whisper

Inviato da iPad

--
Paolo Cuneo
SM 454 Whisper


Onan generator oil pan drain pipe

Sv Garulfo
 

Hi all,

The oil pan drain pipe on our Onan MDKBN spec D generator has developed a tiny leak between the oil pan and the elbow fitting. 

Looking at the parts catalog, I can only see a plug for that part (#185-5826) instead of the elbow, and no mention of any gasket.

Being in a remote location, I’m reluctant to take the thing appart to inspect what I may need, especially as the leak is far from severe (maybe a drop every few days). 

Does anyone know what part I should look for?

Thanks


Thomas
GARULFO 
A54-122
Tahaa, French Polynesia. 





Re: A54 Main Sail furling foil weak point

Porter McRoberts
 

Arno. Great solutions thank you. As with many things it’s not if but when, so when our foil goes I’ll be looking back to your photos. But also wanted to report: no foil issues yet: and no battens. Possible correlation supporting Bill R’s theory.   
Thanks again. 

Porter McRoberts 
S/V IBIS A54-152 Society Islands
WhatsApp:+1 754 265 2206
Www.fouribis.net

On Mar 28, 2021, at 7:53 AM, Markus Merz <markus.merz@...> wrote:



Just one little addition:

When the boat was new I had quite often problems, furling in the mainsail. But one day I noticed that it is necessary to put the boom absolutely horizontal. If you do so, you can reef and furl in any directions to the wind. I never had problems again.

All the best

Markus

SEDA, Amel 54, No 138

 

 

Von: <main@AmelYachtOwners.groups.io> im Auftrag von "CW Bill Rouse via groups.io" <brouse@...>
Antworten an: "main@AmelYachtOwners.groups.io" <main@AmelYachtOwners.groups.io>
Datum: Sonntag, 28. März 2021 um 18:21
An: "main@AmelYachtOwners.groups.io Notification" <main@AmelYachtOwners.groups.io>
Betreff: Re: [AmelYachtOwners] A54 Main Sail furling foil weak point

 

It is worth noting and should be of interest to any SM and 54 owners that all SMs and most Amel 54s have the same diameter foil. It is 35mm. This changed with the last 54s.

 

In my experience, very few SMs have had a foil failure, and most SMs that have had a foil failure have purchased sails with battens. The Amel 54 was sold with battens standard in the Mainsail. I have seen many more Amel 54s experience this foil failure than SMs, even though more than twice as many SMs were made by Amel. Additionally, you will find that Amel increased the size of the foil with the last Amel 54s produced. If you have a foil larger than 35mm and battens in the main, you may not experience this failure. I suggest that if you have a 35mm foil, you might consider removing the battens. 

 

TRANSPARENCY: I do not recommend battens for Amels produced before the Amel 55 and with a 35mm foil. I believe the slight benefit associated with adding battens to a cruising boat's furling mainsail is NOT worth the Risks. Assuming that you would replace the failed 35mm foil with a new 1-piece 40mm foil, the replacement will cost you between 10,000 and 15,000 including labor.

 

 The repair kit for the Amel 54 35mm foil was designed by Amel:

<image001.png>

 

CW Bill Rouse Amel Owners Yacht School

Address: 720 Winnie, Galveston Island, Texas 77550 

 

View My Training Calendar

 

 

On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 10:08 AM Arno Luijten <arno.luijten@...> wrote:

Dear Forum,

This week I finished a repair that may interest a few of you. From what I know quite a few A54s have had a repair to the foil inside the main mast.
Our build number 121 has had a repair on the foil at some point. Unknown who made the repair.

As we have bought a new mainsail I decided to do a close inspection of the furling system while there is no mainsail present. I noticed the sail-groove between the lower short piece of foil was not exactly in line with the large part that goes up the mast. Upon closer inspection and disassembly I found a few things.
Inside the foil at the point where the two pieces meet is a piece of half-round aluminum rod that connects the two pieces. It is screwed with 8 M4 screws to the inside-back of the foil.
I noticed the rod was actually twisted at the point where two foil-pieces meet. Clearly a result of too much torsion force exhibited to the rod. As the rod occupies less then 50% of the diameter surface of the foil this was not a big surprise. It also explained the misalignment of the the sail-groove. The picture below shows the twist in the rod if you look carefully.

<image002.jpg>


So I had the local workshop straighten out the rod again using heat and other clever stuff. Next I drilled new holes in the reinforcement rod, this time for M5 screws to get a stronger connection between the foil and the rod. I also had the workshop prepare a collar for me that slides exactly over the foil.


<image003.jpg>


The collar has a slit to allow access to the sail-groove in the foil. It screws sideways into the reinforcement rod using M5 screws. I also added a few M4 screws into the front half of the foil. In hindsight I should have used rivets for those front screws as the foil has very little "meat" in the wall to tap a thread.

This is the result

<image004.jpg>
<image005.jpg>


<image005.jpg>
<image006.jpg>


This will give much more support to the torsion forces exhibited by the motor and I expect the rod no longer to get deformed because of torsion forces.

The original repair was actually done quite sloppy. The screws in the rod were only M4, not drilled perpendicular to the surface and clearly not strong enough as some of them ripped out the threads. Other were seized as no Duralac/Tef-gel was used.
What also went wrong during the original repair is that the reinforcement part that sits inside the base of the foil (a short piece of the same rod as earlier described) where it is connected to the drive system somehow managed to slide upwards into the foil-tube when they were drilling the hole for the bolt that connects the drive to the foil. The result was that the reinforcement part was not doing anything. Because of this the bolt-hole in the foil turned into an oval giving a lot of play in the connection. So I re-drilled/reassembled it to look like this

<image007.jpg>

Now the bolt goes through the reinforcement and I also added a screw to fix the reinforcement part to the back of the foil-tube to prevent it from moving inside the foil. This makes the connection much stronger obviously.

Finally I also modified the outhaul-car to get some better attachment points for the drive system

<image008.jpg>


I hope this is of some help to other Amel owners that may have similar problems.

Regards,

Arno Luijten
SV Luna,
A54-121


Re: A54 Main Sail furling foil weak point

Markus Merz
 

Just one little addition:

When the boat was new I had quite often problems, furling in the mainsail. But one day I noticed that it is necessary to put the boom absolutely horizontal. If you do so, you can reef and furl in any directions to the wind. I never had problems again.

All the best

Markus

SEDA, Amel 54, No 138

 

 

Von: <main@AmelYachtOwners.groups.io> im Auftrag von "CW Bill Rouse via groups.io" <brouse@...>
Antworten an: "main@AmelYachtOwners.groups.io" <main@AmelYachtOwners.groups.io>
Datum: Sonntag, 28. März 2021 um 18:21
An: "main@AmelYachtOwners.groups.io Notification" <main@AmelYachtOwners.groups.io>
Betreff: Re: [AmelYachtOwners] A54 Main Sail furling foil weak point

 

It is worth noting and should be of interest to any SM and 54 owners that all SMs and most Amel 54s have the same diameter foil. It is 35mm. This changed with the last 54s.

 

In my experience, very few SMs have had a foil failure, and most SMs that have had a foil failure have purchased sails with battens. The Amel 54 was sold with battens standard in the Mainsail. I have seen many more Amel 54s experience this foil failure than SMs, even though more than twice as many SMs were made by Amel. Additionally, you will find that Amel increased the size of the foil with the last Amel 54s produced. If you have a foil larger than 35mm and battens in the main, you may not experience this failure. I suggest that if you have a 35mm foil, you might consider removing the battens. 

 

TRANSPARENCY: I do not recommend battens for Amels produced before the Amel 55 and with a 35mm foil. I believe the slight benefit associated with adding battens to a cruising boat's furling mainsail is NOT worth the Risks. Assuming that you would replace the failed 35mm foil with a new 1-piece 40mm foil, the replacement will cost you between 10,000 and 15,000 including labor.

 

 The repair kit for the Amel 54 35mm foil was designed by Amel:

 

CW Bill Rouse Amel Owners Yacht School

Address: 720 Winnie, Galveston Island, Texas 77550 

 

View My Training Calendar

 

 

On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 10:08 AM Arno Luijten <arno.luijten@...> wrote:

Dear Forum,

This week I finished a repair that may interest a few of you. From what I know quite a few A54s have had a repair to the foil inside the main mast.
Our build number 121 has had a repair on the foil at some point. Unknown who made the repair.

As we have bought a new mainsail I decided to do a close inspection of the furling system while there is no mainsail present. I noticed the sail-groove between the lower short piece of foil was not exactly in line with the large part that goes up the mast. Upon closer inspection and disassembly I found a few things.
Inside the foil at the point where the two pieces meet is a piece of half-round aluminum rod that connects the two pieces. It is screwed with 8 M4 screws to the inside-back of the foil.
I noticed the rod was actually twisted at the point where two foil-pieces meet. Clearly a result of too much torsion force exhibited to the rod. As the rod occupies less then 50% of the diameter surface of the foil this was not a big surprise. It also explained the misalignment of the the sail-groove. The picture below shows the twist in the rod if you look carefully.



So I had the local workshop straighten out the rod again using heat and other clever stuff. Next I drilled new holes in the reinforcement rod, this time for M5 screws to get a stronger connection between the foil and the rod. I also had the workshop prepare a collar for me that slides exactly over the foil.




The collar has a slit to allow access to the sail-groove in the foil. It screws sideways into the reinforcement rod using M5 screws. I also added a few M4 screws into the front half of the foil. In hindsight I should have used rivets for those front screws as the foil has very little "meat" in the wall to tap a thread.

This is the result





This will give much more support to the torsion forces exhibited by the motor and I expect the rod no longer to get deformed because of torsion forces.

The original repair was actually done quite sloppy. The screws in the rod were only M4, not drilled perpendicular to the surface and clearly not strong enough as some of them ripped out the threads. Other were seized as no Duralac/Tef-gel was used.
What also went wrong during the original repair is that the reinforcement part that sits inside the base of the foil (a short piece of the same rod as earlier described) where it is connected to the drive system somehow managed to slide upwards into the foil-tube when they were drilling the hole for the bolt that connects the drive to the foil. The result was that the reinforcement part was not doing anything. Because of this the bolt-hole in the foil turned into an oval giving a lot of play in the connection. So I re-drilled/reassembled it to look like this


Now the bolt goes through the reinforcement and I also added a screw to fix the reinforcement part to the back of the foil-tube to prevent it from moving inside the foil. This makes the connection much stronger obviously.

Finally I also modified the outhaul-car to get some better attachment points for the drive system



I hope this is of some help to other Amel owners that may have similar problems.

Regards,

Arno Luijten
SV Luna,
A54-121


Re: Original inverter on SM 2000

Eloi Bamberg
 

Hi
I verified my setup: I have a Mastervolt 24/1200 in the engine room. It must be an original Amel setup because it is shown on the electrical scheme "schema detail K1 - K2" and, according to this scheme, it is "feeding" all of the 220V plugs and the microwave.

regards,
Eloi
SM2K 426 Red Lion


Re: A54 Main Sail furling foil weak point

 

It is worth noting and should be of interest to any SM and 54 owners that all SMs and most Amel 54s have the same diameter foil. It is 35mm. This changed with the last 54s.

In my experience, very few SMs have had a foil failure, and most SMs that have had a foil failure have purchased sails with battens. The Amel 54 was sold with battens standard in the Mainsail. I have seen many more Amel 54s experience this foil failure than SMs, even though more than twice as many SMs were made by Amel. Additionally, you will find that Amel increased the size of the foil with the last Amel 54s produced. If you have a foil larger than 35mm and battens in the main, you may not experience this failure. I suggest that if you have a 35mm foil, you might consider removing the battens. 

TRANSPARENCY: I do not recommend battens for Amels produced before the Amel 55 and with a 35mm foil. I believe the slight benefit associated with adding battens to a cruising boat's furling mainsail is NOT worth the Risks. Assuming that you would replace the failed 35mm foil with a new 1-piece 40mm foil, the replacement will cost you between 10,000 and 15,000 including labor.

 The repair kit for the Amel 54 35mm foil was designed by Amel:
image.png

CW Bill Rouse Amel Owners Yacht School
Address: 720 Winnie, Galveston Island, Texas 77550 
View My Training Calendar


On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 10:08 AM Arno Luijten <arno.luijten@...> wrote:
Dear Forum,

This week I finished a repair that may interest a few of you. From what I know quite a few A54s have had a repair to the foil inside the main mast.
Our build number 121 has had a repair on the foil at some point. Unknown who made the repair.

As we have bought a new mainsail I decided to do a close inspection of the furling system while there is no mainsail present. I noticed the sail-groove between the lower short piece of foil was not exactly in line with the large part that goes up the mast. Upon closer inspection and disassembly I found a few things.
Inside the foil at the point where the two pieces meet is a piece of half-round aluminum rod that connects the two pieces. It is screwed with 8 M4 screws to the inside-back of the foil.
I noticed the rod was actually twisted at the point where two foil-pieces meet. Clearly a result of too much torsion force exhibited to the rod. As the rod occupies less then 50% of the diameter surface of the foil this was not a big surprise. It also explained the misalignment of the the sail-groove. The picture below shows the twist in the rod if you look carefully.



So I had the local workshop straighten out the rod again using heat and other clever stuff. Next I drilled new holes in the reinforcement rod, this time for M5 screws to get a stronger connection between the foil and the rod. I also had the workshop prepare a collar for me that slides exactly over the foil.




The collar has a slit to allow access to the sail-groove in the foil. It screws sideways into the reinforcement rod using M5 screws. I also added a few M4 screws into the front half of the foil. In hindsight I should have used rivets for those front screws as the foil has very little "meat" in the wall to tap a thread.

This is the result





This will give much more support to the torsion forces exhibited by the motor and I expect the rod no longer to get deformed because of torsion forces.

The original repair was actually done quite sloppy. The screws in the rod were only M4, not drilled perpendicular to the surface and clearly not strong enough as some of them ripped out the threads. Other were seized as no Duralac/Tef-gel was used.
What also went wrong during the original repair is that the reinforcement part that sits inside the base of the foil (a short piece of the same rod as earlier described) where it is connected to the drive system somehow managed to slide upwards into the foil-tube when they were drilling the hole for the bolt that connects the drive to the foil. The result was that the reinforcement part was not doing anything. Because of this the bolt-hole in the foil turned into an oval giving a lot of play in the connection. So I re-drilled/reassembled it to look like this


Now the bolt goes through the reinforcement and I also added a screw to fix the reinforcement part to the back of the foil-tube to prevent it from moving inside the foil. This makes the connection much stronger obviously.

Finally I also modified the outhaul-car to get some better attachment points for the drive system



I hope this is of some help to other Amel owners that may have similar problems.

Regards,

Arno Luijten
SV Luna,
A54-121


asymmetrical spinnaker

PAOLO CUNEO
 

 

Hi all,

Here the documentation of my approach to the Code Zero (better: G Zero to use the wording of my sailmaker, 92 sm, integral anti-twist halyard, detachable bow roller). The video shows the final check of the clearance between the rolled genoa and the dummy halyard I used for the test, using the central roller as a tack .Both rigger and sailmaker agreed that everything seemed ok so I decided to proceed.

The photos show the dyneema strip (trebled) in an open loop that goes around the rubber central roller and is  made fast with the snapshackle. Note: in my case the loop must be as short as possible to avoid twisting, as I use a roll-on Code D with integral anti-twist halyard sewn in and its attachment point must not turn. As it is, the dyneema loop makes about half a turn then stops, allowing the halyard to start rolling up the Code.  If somebody is using  a sleeve instead, this point is, obviously, not a critical one. The last two photos show the  code in place, rolled at rest and in action. It can be seen that the clearance is not big but sufficient for the purpose, and in one season use, the system  proved  basically trouble free

Regards,

Paolo Cuneo

SM 454 Whisper


--
Paolo Cuneo
SM 454 Whisper


A54 Main Sail furling foil weak point

Arno Luijten
 

Dear Forum,

This week I finished a repair that may interest a few of you. From what I know quite a few A54s have had a repair to the foil inside the main mast.
Our build number 121 has had a repair on the foil at some point. Unknown who made the repair.

As we have bought a new mainsail I decided to do a close inspection of the furling system while there is no mainsail present. I noticed the sail-groove between the lower short piece of foil was not exactly in line with the large part that goes up the mast. Upon closer inspection and disassembly I found a few things.
Inside the foil at the point where the two pieces meet is a piece of half-round aluminum rod that connects the two pieces. It is screwed with 8 M4 screws to the inside-back of the foil.
I noticed the rod was actually twisted at the point where two foil-pieces meet. Clearly a result of too much torsion force exhibited to the rod. As the rod occupies less then 50% of the diameter surface of the foil this was not a big surprise. It also explained the misalignment of the the sail-groove. The picture below shows the twist in the rod if you look carefully.



So I had the local workshop straighten out the rod again using heat and other clever stuff. Next I drilled new holes in the reinforcement rod, this time for M5 screws to get a stronger connection between the foil and the rod. I also had the workshop prepare a collar for me that slides exactly over the foil.




The collar has a slit to allow access to the sail-groove in the foil. It screws sideways into the reinforcement rod using M5 screws. I also added a few M4 screws into the front half of the foil. In hindsight I should have used rivets for those front screws as the foil has very little "meat" in the wall to tap a thread.

This is the result





This will give much more support to the torsion forces exhibited by the motor and I expect the rod no longer to get deformed because of torsion forces.

The original repair was actually done quite sloppy. The screws in the rod were only M4, not drilled perpendicular to the surface and clearly not strong enough as some of them ripped out the threads. Other were seized as no Duralac/Tef-gel was used.
What also went wrong during the original repair is that the reinforcement part that sits inside the base of the foil (a short piece of the same rod as earlier described) where it is connected to the drive system somehow managed to slide upwards into the foil-tube when they were drilling the hole for the bolt that connects the drive to the foil. The result was that the reinforcement part was not doing anything. Because of this the bolt-hole in the foil turned into an oval giving a lot of play in the connection. So I re-drilled/reassembled it to look like this


Now the bolt goes through the reinforcement and I also added a screw to fix the reinforcement part to the back of the foil-tube to prevent it from moving inside the foil. This makes the connection much stronger obviously.

Finally I also modified the outhaul-car to get some better attachment points for the drive system



I hope this is of some help to other Amel owners that may have similar problems.

Regards,

Arno Luijten
SV Luna,
A54-121


Re: Original inverter on SM 2000

 

Yes, that 500 watt inverter was for the TV and installed if you bought the TV package
CW Bill Rouse Amel Owners Yacht School
Address: 720 Winnie, Galveston Island, Texas 77550 
View My Training Calendar


On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 7:18 AM Barry Connor via groups.io <connor_barry=yahoo.com@groups.io> wrote:
Having just completed my Lithium install I have this Mastervolt mass sine 24/500. Excellent condition.
Available if anyone is in need.

Barry and Penny
"SV Lady Penelope II"
Amel 54.  #17
Sainte Anne anchorage  Martinique

On Sunday, March 28, 2021, 5:49:23 AM EDT, Slavko Despotovic <slavko@...> wrote:


Update to inverter. It is Mastervolt  mass sine 24/500. It is installed opposite  to 24/12V converter bellow the navigation desk. Supplies 220V to computer on navigation desk and TV set.
--
Slavko
SM 2000
#279 Bonne Anse in Portoroz


Re: asymmetrical spinnaker

PAOLO CUNEO
 

Eric,
Your solution of a short removable bowsprit is sound and well proven, no question about that, and I much respect it. Mine is only a matter of a personal preference, and I took a little bit of a chance trying something of which, at least in my area, there was no .previous reference. Fortunately everything went well and I’ll put some photos on my next post
Bests
Paolo
SM 454 Whisper

Inviato da iPad

--
Paolo Cuneo
SM 454 Whisper


Re: Original inverter on SM 2000

Barry Connor
 

Having just completed my Lithium install I have this Mastervolt mass sine 24/500. Excellent condition.
Available if anyone is in need.

Barry and Penny
"SV Lady Penelope II"
Amel 54.  #17
Sainte Anne anchorage  Martinique

On Sunday, March 28, 2021, 5:49:23 AM EDT, Slavko Despotovic <slavko@...> wrote:


Update to inverter. It is Mastervolt  mass sine 24/500. It is installed opposite  to 24/12V converter bellow the navigation desk. Supplies 220V to computer on navigation desk and TV set.
--
Slavko
SM 2000
#279 Bonne Anse in Portoroz


Re: Original inverter on SM 2000

Slavko Despotovic
 

Update to inverter. It is Mastervolt  mass sine 24/500. It is installed opposite  to 24/12V converter bellow the navigation desk. Supplies 220V to computer on navigation desk and TV set.
--
Slavko
SM 2000
#279 Bonne Anse in Portoroz


Re: Windscreen Replacement

Ken Powers SV Aquarius
 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JHpFEHGCyqg

From about 14:40 to 17:40 this video shows the replacement of the front windows.  ALL OF THEM (4) for a total of $1200.  And, after 2 years, I am still happy with the final product.  

Best,

Ken Powers
Aquarius currently in Thailand
SM2K#262


Re: Windscreen Replacement

Bill Kinney
 

US$1400 for materials?   That seems rather.... insane.

A 36"x72" sheet of 3/8 (10mm) acrylic sheet costs less than US$300 retail in the US market.  It always pays to shop around...


Re: asymmetrical spinnaker

Eloi Bamberg
 

I think if the sail is luffing there is a risk that the line get stucked, so i prefere this setup with more guidance.

Eloi


Windscreen Replacement

eric freedman
 

Hi Bill,

From whom did you get the material and labor?

Fair Winds

Eric

 

 

 

From: main@AmelYachtOwners.groups.io On Behalf Of william reynolds
Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2021 12:11 PM
To: main@AmelYachtOwners.groups.io
Subject: [AmelYachtOwners] Windscreen Replacement

 

I tried to replace my forward and side acrylic windows and was quoted $1400.00 US for the material and $600.00 to install them
I checked St Thomas and the 10mm acrylic price was $280.00 US  and $200.00 US to cut and drill them. I removed the old windows with my Fein Tool scraper blade.
They would have installed them for $240.00 US more.
Bill Reynolds
Cloudstreet SM2K 331


Re: Windscreen Replacement

 

I bought the Plexiglass brand from a dealer in Turkey.

Bill
CW Bill Rouse Amel Owners Yacht School
Address: 720 Winnie, Galveston Island, Texas 77550 
View My Training Calendar


On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 12:59 PM eric freedman <kimberlite@...> wrote:

Hi Bill,

From whom did you get the material and labor?

Fair Winds

Eric

Kimberlite Amel Super Maramu #376

 

 

From: main@AmelYachtOwners.groups.io On Behalf Of william reynolds
Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2021 12:11 PM
To: main@AmelYachtOwners.groups.io
Subject: [AmelYachtOwners] Windscreen Replacement

 

I tried to replace my forward and side acrylic windows and was quoted $1400.00 US for the material and $600.00 to install them
I checked St Thomas and the 10mm acrylic price was $280.00 US  and $200.00 US to cut and drill them. I removed the old windows with my Fein Tool scraper blade.
They would have installed them for $240.00 US more.
Bill Reynolds
Cloudstreet SM2K 331

1381 - 1400 of 58504