[Amel Yacht Owners] Re: Rig Tuning


Patrick McAneny
 

Joel, That was interesting , its good to hear confirmation of what you believe to be true. Could you address the backstays, I have never kept them nearly as tight and have gathered that they are not suppose to be. Could you comment on how tight is right .
Thanks Joel,
Pat
SM Shenanigans
 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: n33077@... [amelyachtowners]
To: amelyachtowners
Sent: Tue, Mar 1, 2016 9:22 am
Subject: [Amel Yacht Owners] Re: Rig Tuning

 
I think I just found it:
o understand why the rig tension on an Amel is so very different than
on other fiberglass boats, we must first consider and understand the
structural differences that Amel boats have compared to more ordinary
boats from other builders.



Amel boats are true monocoque structures. An egg is a perfect
monocoque structure, as an illustration. If you take an egg and place
it in the palm of your hand, wrap your fingers around it evenly, and
then squeeze as hard as you possibly can, it will not break. Go ahead,
off to the fridge you go...I'll wait.



See what I mean? Only if you "point load"/unequally squeeze the egg
will it crush. Great party trick by the way...



Recall the recent story about Eric Freedman and being inside his Amel
offshore in hurricane wind and seas; not a sound inside. No creaking
or groaning. No oil canning. No panel deflection... Amel boats are one
piece, no conventional hull to deck joint, they are very strong and
uncommonly rigid. They are a genuine monocoque.



On most fiberglass boats, the rig is tuned tight but when sailing, the
leeward shrouds flop around like al dente spaghetti while the windward
shrouds are tight as a drum. This is due primarily because of hull
flex. Even the better known "premium brands", you know who they are,
have this flexing in the hull.



THIS IS NOT GOOD. Fiberglass, just like metal, gets weaker and weaker
every time it is bent or flexed. Just as when one takes a paperclip
and bends it back and forth a few times and it breaks in two, a flexed
fiberglass hull gets weaker with use. Amel boats are designed not to
flex for good reason; they stay stronger and last longer that way. The
rigging needs to be exceptionally tight as well for reasons I'll
relate shortly.



Riggers will never believe this as it is contrary to what they know to
be usual and correct. Unless a rigger unfamiliar with and not
accepting of Amel idiosyncrasies can put his hands on an Amel that has
been tuned by Amel, they will never believe and will refuse to tune an
Amel to the tension that is required.



An Amel should be tuned so that the mast is absolutely straight and
perpendicular to the mast step/90 degrees. The shrouds should never be
loose on the leeward side even under the press of strong breeze. Just
a tad slack, but not loose and certainly not able to be moved back and
forth. The headstay should only have a very modest bend even in a good
breeze. I have tuned many Amel rigs and I can do it but it is hard to
tell you how tight is "tight". I don't use a strain gauge, I just do
it. I was a rigger in an earlier life so I know the sequence to follow
to get the right outcome but it is difficult to impart to you how
tight. REAL tight. Tight as you dare then a tad more. Ringing bronze
tight...ahh, what's the use......



Try to find an Amel that is owned by someone we (Amel and or me) sold
a boat to. We impress upon our new clients and my second hand boat
clients to take note of how tight the rig is and to keep it this way.
They usually do. Second only perhaps to mechanics who call all flaming
irate to tell me that the Amel drive system will never work (once or
twice a month sometimes) are the riggers who call to say the rig is
way too tight or to insist they won't tighten it up the way we tell
them too. It is the "not invented here syndrome" all over again. Ain't
what I am familiar with so there-fore it can't possibly
work...Sometimes they say uncharitable things about my ancestors...



What's the risk? Plenty. If the rig is loose, it can move around.
Combine wave action and puffy breeze and the rig can pump and move
around inches with tremendously quick acceleration and sudden
deceleration of all the rigging mass. This can more than double the
ultimate load placed on the rig and all the components. It will loosen
the boat up real quick. As mentioned before, that is not good for the
structure. Just imagine accelerated pulling/jolting on all the rig
points with wire connections; kinda like squeezing that egg unevenly,
no? Hmmmm...



Show this to your rigger. Have him call me if he says fiddlesticks.
Better yet have him call Amel. They may be a bit more, uh, forceful
than me (if that's possible...) but from the horses' mouth the truth
shall flow. Maybe they will believe the builder as they seldom think I
have it right. Best is to let them see a properly tuned Amel rig.



After new rigging is installed, Amel tuned tight, and sailed in heavy
breeze and seas, it will stretch as much as 8% and even more dependent
on the wire quality. Tune it tight again, then put the little bolts
and nuts back in the wire ends inside the turnbuckles (bet you
wondered why Amel does that..) and smile. You will only need to very
occasionally retune rig components as once it is right, it doesn't
move, it NEVER pumps, and it stays as it was meant to by God, Captain
Amel, and the entire Amel team. Me too.



Trust me on this or put your hands on a well kept Amel.



Have fun with your Maramu. They are very sweet sea boats.



All the best,

Joel



Joel F. Potter - Cruising Yacht Specialist, LLC

Amel's Sole Associate for the Americas

401 East Las Olas Boulevard, #130-126

Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301

Phone: (954) 462-5869

Email: jfpottercys@...

<http://www.yachtworld.com/jfpottercys>
Joel F. Potter - Cruising Yacht Specialist, LLC (Fort Lauderdale, FL)
 


amelforme
 

Hey Pat. There is also a very good rig tune instructional that I believe was placed in the Yahoo group from Olivier.

 

Good question on the mizzen backstays. When you tune the rig, tune the main and mizzen INDEPENDANTLY from each other. Straight up and down vertically. Use the headstay and main backstay, NOT the triatic, to get the rig in column and the headstay tight,  do NOT use the triatic. Adjust the triatic last. It should be just tight enough to remove all sloppiness but not pull any part of the rig anywhere. Jacques Carteau told me it is not really needed structurally and is mainly an antennae. He said that the insulators used to make it an antennae were chosen by their fairly weak  design strength which would theoretically allow them to fail in case of over tension before the main or mizzen masts could initiate a rigging failure of eithers rigging.

 

The mizzen should be tuned only with the upper and lower shrouds. Again, tight and straight up and down. Tension the split backstays to have an ‘easy  inch or two’ of slack . These are ‘limiters’ that should arrest excessive mizzen mast movement but they should not pull any part of the rig anywhere. If they are too tight the first thing you will notice is stress cracks where the mizzen backstays attach at the transom… these cracks can also come from having the headstay/backstay tension relationship on the main mast too loose allowing it to “pump” in certain wind/sea conditions which subjects the entire rig to dangerous inertial loading. Eventually, just about every one of the hundreds of Super Maramu’s I have sold and resold  manifest some slight cracking at the transom due to the fact that the transom is an “insert” laminated into the boat after it comes out of the mold instead of being part of the structural monocoque that the entire rest of the hull and deck assembly represent. This is also the reason one needs to reinforce the transom with fore though and professional assistance if it is used to support davits or an arch as it was not designed to ever do so.

 

Just as marine tech’s unfamiliar with the Amel DC electrical system ( which is, essentially, exactly the same as what is found on most aluminum boats where ANY electrolytic action can be quickly terminal ) say it is overly complex and then proceed to corrupt it with disastrous results, most riggers say that the rig should not be as tight as we espouse here. Usually I can discuss the big picture with them and the light might go on in their heads, but not always. In the three day school I offer my clients after the purchase of their “new to them” Amel, I spend a great deal of time explaining the Amel characteristics that are not mainstream so that when they need repairs in the future, the Amel owner is well equipped to discern if the tech they are hopefully “interviewing” is capable of making a correct repair and not instigating a potential catastrophe.

 

Certainly, I don’t know it all. None of us do. But I am fortunate that Amel insisted that I know their boats technically as well as from a features/how to sell standpoint. I am happy to help with anything I am able to if I am asked.

 

Have fun with your Amel.

 

All The Best, Joel

Joel F. Potter/Cruising Yacht Specialist LLC

THE EXPERIENCED AMEL GUY

954 462 5869 office

954 812 2485 cell

 

 

 

 


karkauai
 

Thank you again and again, Joel, for sharing your expertise here.  That's the first time I've heard this about the mizzen back stays.    My masts are straight and my mizzen back stays are about what you describe, but I assure you that it's more luck than a thorough understanding of how it should be done.

All the best,
Kent
SM 243
Kristy


On Mar 3, 2016, at 9:29 AM, 'Joel Potter' jfpottercys@... [amelyachtowners] <amelyachtowners@...> wrote:

 

Hey Pat. There is also a very good rig tune instructional that I believe was placed in the Yahoo group from Olivier.

 

Good question on the mizzen backstays. When you tune the rig, tune the main and mizzen INDEPENDANTLY from each other. Straight up and down vertically. Use the headstay and main backstay, NOT the triatic, to get the rig in column and the headstay tight,  do NOT use the triatic. Adjust the triatic last. It should be just tight enough to remove all sloppiness but not pull any part of the rig anywhere. Jacques Carteau told me it is not really needed structurally and is mainly an antennae. He said that the insulators used to make it an antennae were chosen by their fairly weak  design strength which would theoretically allow them to fail in case of over tension before the main or mizzen masts could initiate a rigging failure of eithers rigging.

 

The mizzen should be tuned only with the upper and lower shrouds. Again, tight and straight up and down. Tension the split backstays to have an ‘easy  inch or two’ of slack . These are ‘limiters’ that should arrest excessive mizzen mast movement but they should not pull any part of the rig anywhere. If they are too tight the first thing you will notice is stress cracks where the mizzen backstays attach at the transom… these cracks can also come from having the headstay/backstay tension relationship on the main mast too loose allowing it to “pump” in certain wind/sea conditions which subjects the entire rig to dangerous inertial loading. Eventually, just about every one of the hundreds of Super Maramu’s I have sold and resold  manifest some slight cracking at the transom due to the fact that the transom is an “insert” laminated into the boat after it comes out of the mold instead of being part of the structural monocoque that the entire rest of the hull and deck assembly represent. This is also the reason one needs to reinforce the transom with fore though and professional assistance if it is used to support davits or an arch as it was not designed to ever do so.

 

Just as marine tech’s unfamiliar with the Amel DC electrical system ( which is, essentially, exactly the same as what is found on most aluminum boats where ANY electrolytic action can be quickly terminal ) say it is overly complex and then proceed to corrupt it with disastrous results, most riggers say that the rig should not be as tight as we espouse here. Usually I can discuss the big picture with them and the light might go on in their heads, but not always. In the three day school I offer my clients after the purchase of their “new to them” Amel, I spend a great deal of time explaining the Amel characteristics that are not mainstream so that when they need repairs in the future, the Amel owner is well equipped to discern if the tech they are hopefully “interviewing” is capable of making a correct repair and not instigating a potential catastrophe.

 

Certainly, I don’t know it all. None of us do. But I am fortunate that Amel insisted that I know their boats technically as well as from a features/how to sell standpoint. I am happy to help with anything I am able to if I am asked.

 

Have fun with your Amel.

 

All The Best, Joel

Joel F. Potter/Cruising Yacht Specialist LLC

THE EXPERIENCED AMEL GUY

954 462 5869 office

954 812 2485 cell

 

 

 

 


rossienio@...
 

I read it with great interest, thanks. But I still have this problem : the upper part of my main mast is curved towards the bow (reverse bend). And I can not  fix it by tighening the backstay. Could someone tell me what I to do? Good winds. enio


Patrick McAneny
 

Joel, Thanks for your reply and confirming what I believed, but did not know , the proper backstay tension.
Pat
SM Shenanigans
 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: 'Joel Potter' jfpottercys@... [amelyachtowners]
To: amelyachtowners
Sent: Thu, Mar 3, 2016 9:29 am
Subject: RE: [Amel Yacht Owners] Re: Rig Tuning

 
Hey Pat. There is also a very good rig tune instructional that I believe was placed in the Yahoo group from Olivier.
 
Good question on the mizzen backstays. When you tune the rig, tune the main and mizzen INDEPENDANTLY from each other. Straight up and down vertically. Use the headstay and main backstay, NOT the triatic, to get the rig in column and the headstay tight,  do NOT use the triatic. Adjust the triatic last. It should be just tight enough to remove all sloppiness but not pull any part of the rig anywhere. Jacques Carteau told me it is not really needed structurally and is mainly an antennae. He said that the insulators used to make it an antennae were chosen by their fairly weak  design strength which would theoretically allow them to fail in case of over tension before the main or mizzen masts could initiate a rigging failure of eithers rigging.
 
The mizzen should be tuned only with the upper and lower shrouds. Again, tight and straight up and down. Tension the split backstays to have an ‘easy  inch or two’ of slack . These are ‘limiters’ that should arrest excessive mizzen mast movement but they should not pull any part of the rig anywhere. If they are too tight the first thing you will notice is stress cracks where the mizzen backstays attach at the transom… these cracks can also come from having the headstay/backstay tension relationship on the main mast too loose allowing it to “pump” in certain wind/sea conditions which subjects the entire rig to dangerous inertial loading. Eventually, just about every one of the hundreds of Super Maramu’s I have sold and resold  manifest some slight cracking at the transom due to the fact that the transom is an “insert” laminated into the boat after it comes out of the mold instead of being part of the structural monocoque that the entire rest of the hull and deck assembly represent. This is also the reason one needs to reinforce the transom with fore though and professional assistance if it is used to support davits or an arch as it was not designed to ever do so.
 
Just as marine tech’s unfamiliar with the Amel DC electrical system ( which is, essentially, exactly the same as what is found on most aluminum boats where ANY electrolytic action can be quickly terminal ) say it is overly complex and then proceed to corrupt it with disastrous results, most riggers say that the rig should not be as tight as we espouse here. Usually I can discuss the big picture with them and the light might go on in their heads, but not always. In the three day school I offer my clients after the purchase of their “new to them” Amel, I spend a great deal of time explaining the Amel characteristics that are not mainstream so that when they need repairs in the future, the Amel owner is well equipped to discern if the tech they are hopefully “interviewing” is capable of making a correct repair and not instigating a potential catastrophe.
 
Certainly, I don’t know it all. None of us do. But I am fortunate that Amel insisted that I know their boats technically as well as from a features/how to sell standpoint. I am happy to help with anything I am able to if I am asked.
 
Have fun with your Amel.
 
All The Best, Joel
Joel F. Potter/Cruising Yacht Specialist LLC
THE EXPERIENCED AMEL GUY
954 462 5869 office
954 812 2485 cell
 
 
 
 


amelforme
 

Have you tried loosening the head stay?

Joel F. Potter
THE EXPERIENCED AMEL GUY
954-812-2485

On Mar 3, 2016, at 12:05 PM, rossienio@... [amelyachtowners] <amelyachtowners@...> wrote:

 

I read it with great interest, thanks. But I still have this problem : the upper part of my main mast is curved towards the bow (reverse bend). And I can not  fix it by tighening the backstay. Could someone tell me what I to do? Good winds. enio


rossienio@...
 

Yes, and 'wath i'm doing, but becomes to loose the triatic, which has a fixed lenght, and the main mast seems to bend at the lower spreads. This also tightening the lower shrouds aft..........Thanks. Enio 


Craig Briggs
 

Hello Enio,
You may want to reread Joel's earlier post about tuning the masts independently, starting with the main. You should consider the triatic to be part of the mizzen and ignore it until you get the main straight and tight. Beyond that it is a little difficult to understand what the problem is. Have you tried slacking all the stays and seeing if the mast is straight? 
If it is straight with no tension on the stays, you should be able to keep it so as you tension the stays in the order Joel specified. Keep the triatic slack (by loosening the mizzen backs) until you are done with the main.
If it is still bent with all stays loose, perhaps it was bent by a yard at some point when it was off the boat (just guessing) - take it down and bend it back so it is straight. 
Let us know how you make out.
Craig Briggs, SN68 Sangaris, Florida
---In amelyachtowners@..., <rossienio@...> wrote :
Yes, and 'wath i'm doing, but becomes to loose the triatic, which has a fixed lenght, and the main mast seems to bend at the lower spreads. This also tightening the lower shrouds aft..........Thanks. Enio 


hanspeter baettig
 

Hello Craig
I like your wordings :-)
Take the mast down, bend it back so it is straight.
I'm wondering how you will do that ?

You have something invented in the US to do that. Let me know that is interessting :-)
Good sailing, and don't take that to serious
Hanspeter
SM 16 Tamango 2


Von meinem iPad gesendet

Am 04.03.2016 um 14:58 schrieb sangaris@... [amelyachtowners] <amelyachtowners@...>:

 

Hello Enio,

You may want to reread Joel's earlier post about tuning the masts independently, starting with the main. You should consider the triatic to be part of the mizzen and ignore it until you get the main straight and tight. Beyond that it is a little difficult to understand what the problem is. Have you tried slacking all the stays and seeing if the mast is straight? 
If it is straight with no tension on the stays, you should be able to keep it so as you tension the stays in the order Joel specified. Keep the triatic slack (by loosening the mizzen backs) until you are done with the main.
If it is still bent with all stays loose, perhaps it was bent by a yard at some point when it was off the boat (just guessing) - take it down and bend it back so it is straight. 
Let us know how you make out.
Craig Briggs, SN68 Sangaris, Flo rida
---In amelyachtowners@..., wrote :
Yes, and 'wath i'm doing, but becomes to loose the triatic, which has a fixed lenght, and the main mast seems to bend at the lower spreads. This also tightening the lower shrouds aft..........Thanks. Enio 


Craig Briggs
 

Hi Hanspeter,
Quite easy, actually. Assuming it was bent while off the boat in a yard, just do the opposite of what bent it in the first place!  :-)
Seriously, though, I've bent several masts back into column when they got bent in the yard - usually by cars accidentally backing into them.  Just a matter of applying enough force on the opposite side with logical blocking and cushioning. Usually used a fork lift truck to slowly apply pressure. Obviously, you can't go past the point of elastic deformation.
That being said, I'll bet this is not Enio's problem - he likely just needs a more systematic approach to the tuning. 
Cheers,
Craig SN68 Sangaris


---In amelyachtowners@..., <hanspeter.baettig@...> wrote :

Hello Craig
I like your wordings :-)
Take the mast down, bend it back so it is straight.
I'm wondering how you will do that ?

You have something invented in the US to do that. Let me know that is interessting :-)
Good sailing, and don't take that to serious
Hanspeter
SM 16 Tamango 2


Von meinem iPad gesendet

Am 04.03.2016 um 14:58 schrieb sangaris@... [amelyachtowners] <amelyachtowners@...>:

 

Hello Enio,

You may want to reread Joel's earlier post about tuning the masts independently, starting with the main. You should consider the triatic to be part of the mizzen and ignore it until you get the main straight and tight. Beyond that it is a little difficult to understand what the problem is. Have you tried slacking all the stays and seeing if the mast is straight? 
If it is straight with no tension on the stays, you should be able to keep it so as you tension the stays in the order Joel specified. Keep the triatic slack (by loosening the mizzen backs) until you are done with the main.
If it is still bent with all stays loose, perhaps it was bent by a yard at some point when it was off the boat (just guessing) - take it down and bend it back so it is straight. 
Let us know how you make out.
Craig Briggs, SN68 Sangaris, Flo rida
---In amelyachtowners@..., <rossienio@...> wrote :
Yes, and 'wath i'm doing, but becomes to loose the triatic, which has a fixed lenght, and the main mast seems to bend at the lower spreads. This also tightening the lower shrouds aft..........Thanks. Enio 


hanspeter baettig
 

Hi Craig
Sounds pretty cool. Now I understand your trick. Thanks.
Cheers
Hanspeter

Von meinem iPad gesendet

Am 04.03.2016 um 19:04 schrieb sangaris@... [amelyachtowners] <amelyachtowners@...>:

 

Hi Hanspeter,

Quite easy, actually. Assuming it was bent while off the boat in a yard, just do the opposite of what bent it in the first place!  :-)
Seriously, though, I've bent several masts back into column when they got bent in the yard - usually by cars accidentally backing into them.  Just a matter of applying enough force on the opposite side with logical blocking and cushioning. Usually used a fork lift truck to slowly apply pressure. Obviously, you can't go past the point of elastic deformation.
That being said, I'll bet this is not Enio's problem - he likely just needs a more systematic approach to the tuning. 
Cheers,
Craig SN68 Sangaris


---In amelyachtowners@..., wrote :

Hello Craig
I like your wo rdings :-)
Take the mast down, bend it back so it is straight.
I'm wondering how you will do that ?

You have something invented in the US to do that. Let me know that is interessting :-)
Good sailing, and don't take that to serious
Hanspeter
SM 16 Tamango 2


Von meinem iPad gesendet

Am 04.03.2016 um 14:58 schrieb sangaris@... [amelyachtowners] <amelyachtowners@...&g t;:

 

Hello Enio,

You may want to reread Joel's earlier post about tuning the masts independently, starting with the main. You should consider the triatic to be part of the mizzen and ignore it until you get the main straight and tight. Beyond that it is a little difficult to understand what the problem is. Have you tried slacking all the stays and seeing if the mast is straight? 
If it is straight with no tension on the stays, you should be able to keep it so as you tension the stays in the order Joel specified. Keep the triatic slack (by loosening the mizzen backs) until you are done with the main.
If it is still bent with all stays loose, perhaps it was bent by a yard at some point when it was off the boat (just guessing) - take it down and bend it back so it is straight. 
Let us know how you make out.
Craig Briggs, SN68 Sangaris, Flo rida
---In amelyachtowners@..., wrote :
Yes, and 'wath i'm doing, but becomes to loose the triatic, which has a fixed lenght, and the main mast seems to bend at the lower spreads. This also tightening the lower shrouds aft..........Thanks. Enio 


rossienio@...
 

Hi Craigh, I think my problem of reverse bend of the upper part of main mast, is due to a DEFORMATION produced by having kept too straight the forestay and the backstay too slow with strong winds.
Now I have losened the forestay, I put a rope as babystay that attaches to the crosses high and tight the backstay. So the mast seems ok, I hope that the mast remains that way even without baby. Greetings to all and i hope you understand wath I mean in Elglish. Regards. Enio


Craig Briggs
 

Hi Enio,
Yes, it would be much easier if we should all spoke each others language! But I think I understand you. Let us know what happens when you remove the rope baby stay.  
I do think you should not have to use the baby stay to tune your rig - if you loosen everything, including the lowers, your mast should be straight.  Is it?
Cheers, Craig SN68 Sangaris


---In amelyachtowners@..., <rossienio@...> wrote :

Hi Craigh, I think my problem of reverse bend of the upper part of main mast, is due to a DEFORMATION produced by having kept too straight the forestay and the backstay too slow with strong winds.
Now I have losened the forestay, I put a rope as babystay that attaches to the crosses high and tight the backstay. So the mast seems ok, I hope that the mast remains that way even without baby. Greetings to all and i hope you understand wath I mean in Elglish. Regards. Enio


rossienio@...
 

Thanks Craigh for your attention. At week end I'll be in  the boat and , if weather is good, i try to loose  everything,  then i'll write the resut.regards Enio