Hi Miles, thanks for this. However I am fortunate not to be one of the major or total loss incidents. We had a surge from a nearby lightning strike. We were not hit but lost a lot of electronics from the surge. The insurers turned themselves inside out to make life as difficult as possible for us. In the end we got everything replaced with new equipment the same as we had. All good but cost us a lot. It was several years ago and all systems have worked fine ever since. I have talked it over with our new broker
Regards
Danny
Sent from my Vodafone Smart
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
On 17 Feb 2018 11:38, "'Miles Bidwell' milesbid@... [amelyachtowners]" <amelyachtowners@...> wrote:
Hello Danny, I have been following your sad story and I feel very badly for you. It is of no value to you, but, on behalf of others, I want to put in some comments following Eric’s post about Pantaenius insurance. I had Pantaenius for 8 years in Europe after 6 months with Lloyds. Pantaenius was about one-third the cost for better coverage. I didn’t have any claims, but a friend had his boat almost destroyed on the hard by a hurricane in Granada. He said that Pantaenius adjusters were the first on the scene. His boat had a repair estimate (shipping back to France) about the same as the agreed value. He chose to repair and still has the boat. Pantaenius Europe does not insure American owned boats in US waters (they don’t like trial lawyers) so I had to give it up when I came back. Now, Pantaenius has a US company affiliate (subsidiary?) and I again have their insurance. I have an agreed upon value policy that appears to be exactly what they say it is. There is no fine print. We agreed upon the value after I had an appraiser go over my boat and list all of the things that I had added or replaced and the condition and we estimated a market value that Pantaenius accepted without question. I did have a major claim a year ago after something big ran into my boat when it was on a mooring in Newport RI. Pantaenius took care of their part without difficulty for me and without any argument. Regards, Miles s/y Ladybug, sm216 in Port du Marin, Martinique
|
|

Alan Leslie
Hi Danny Your new broker is the same broker we have had since 2010. He's OK, he's a sailor, and we have never had any issues with him. Generally he insures through VELOS a UK company which reinsures through Lloyds Clear and precise policies, no "fine print" We have been quite content with Neil Bailey Cheers Alan' Elyse SM437 PS...we will be in the "Bay" 5-13 March, if you're around
|
|
|
|

Craig Briggs
Hi Jeff, You left us "hanging" - what did Scott Stusek say about you being covered single handed?
I, too, have Pantaenius (America) and they are great (albeit, no claims). One nuance for anyone who may transport their boat is that the policy is totally clear that it does not cover that and you'll need separate insurance during the transport. The transport company made a point of that also and offered an "all-risk" policy for $300. What they don't tell you is that when your boat is being transported it is considered "marine cargo", not a "yacht", and if there is damage you will only get the depreciated value (plus installation cost). Caveat emptor.
Cheers, Craig ---In amelyachtowners@..., <jmkraus@...> wrote : Good Morning Amelians, Just a note on insurance from my perspective. After arriving back in Puerto Real, Puerto Rico after sailing my escape before Maria's arrival, there were a great number of destroyed boats. I spent days with my dinghy helping salvage equipment and personal items with various boat owners. My Norwegian friend had his S/V Strega holed and awash on the beach. We spent days and countless trips back and forth removing everything aboard. They managed to refloat her, and bring her back to the marina. Using my sat phone email connection (ocens software) he made contact with Pantaneous (Europe). They had a group of adjusters in Puerto Rico within weeks (I think it was 2 weeks), and he was one of the first to be contacted. His boat was valued at 60K. He received a check for 64K. They paid him 4K extra for the salvage of the boat. He is allowed to keep the boat as it was declared a wreck. You should see the pictures of it awash. An owners worst nightmare. He had the boat hole reepaired and gel coated the repair. His intention is to keep it. I will join him aboard for a Regatta within a couple months, and Strega is currently sailing. I also had a lengthy discussion with Scott Stusek of Pantaenious America (they cover Spirit). He explained a number of issues I had clearly and without beating around the bush. Our discussion regarding solo sailing was quite enlightening. I had done a 80 hr solo trip to avoid Maria, and wanted to know the stand Pantaenious would have taken in the event of a collision or other event aboard during that trip. I feel very comfortable with Pantaenious coverage. Best Regards to All!
Jeff Spirit Amel 54 #14
Jeff Spirit A
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 04:47 AM, simms@... [amelyachtowners] wrote:
Hi Miles, thanks for this. However I am fortunate not to be one of the major or total loss incidents. We had a surge from a nearby lightning strike. We were not hit but lost a lot of electronics from the surge. The insurers turned themselves inside out to make life as difficult as possible for us. In the end we got everything replaced with new equipment the same as we had. All good but cost us a lot. It was several years ago and all systems have worked fine ever since. I have talked it over with our new broker
Regards
Danny Sent from my Vodafone Smart On 17 Feb 2018 11:38, "'Miles Bidwell' milesbid@... [amelyachtowners]" <amelyachtowners@...> wrote: Hello Danny, I have been following your sad story and I feel very badly for you. It is of no value to you, but, on behalf of others, I want to put in some comments following Eric’s post about Pantaenius insurance. I had Pantaenius for 8 years in Europe after 6 months with Lloyds. Pantaenius was about one-third the cost for better coverage. I didn’t have any claims, but a friend had his boat almost destroyed on the hard by a hurricane in Granada. He said that Pantaenius adjusters were the first on the scene. His boat had a repair estimate (shipping back to France) about the same as the agreed value. He chose to repair and still has the boat. Pantaenius Europe does not insure American owned boats in US waters (they don’t like trial lawyers) so I had to give it up when I came
back. Now, Pantaenius has a US company affiliate (subsidiary?) and I again have their insurance. I have an agreed upon value policy that appears to be exactly what they say it is. There is no fine print. We agreed upon the value after I had an appraiser go over my boat and list all of the things that I had added or replaced and the condition and we estimated a market value that Pantaenius accepted without question. I did have a major claim a year ago after something big ran into my boat when it was on a mooring in Newport RI. Pantaenius took care of their part without difficulty for me and without any argument. Regards, Miles s/y Ladybug, sm216 in Port du Marin, Martinique
|
|
|
|

Craig Briggs
Thanks, Jeff ... caveat emptor it is!
|
|

Porter McRoberts
This is really great information Thank you!: Especially since Jack Martin can only come up with one quote for our boat starting April: Pantaenius America. Its 10k we were paying 6k with Falvey which is not writing yachts anymore. Thats a big jump as i was told it would go down after our first year of ownership.
Are others seeing the same situation?
Our specs: 520k and sailing Caribbean and south of the 12 by July.
Always appreciated.
Porter
Porter McRoberts S/V Ibis: Amel 54-#152 St. Thomas AYH Red Hook
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Craig, Scott was very diplomatic in the conversation. I'll try to summarize as best as possible. Pantaenious does not specifically address the issue of solo sailing. That said, all insurance coverages expect that the vessel covered has all necessary equipment aboard for a safe passage, and during passage, posts persons for regular watches. The issue is what happens IF an incident occurs? Will Pantaenious walk away if the vessel was piloted solo? Marine law is very different then "terrestrial law." I know first hand. I lost F/V Elizabeth J when she was T-boned while scalloping in deep fog south of LI by a 52' Sportfisherman traveling at 25kts. The Sporty never even slowed down. Sounds pretty cut and dry right? Guess again. So, back to the question. An incident occurs while solo sailing, and damages, and/or injuries are involved, Pantaenious has never walked away from protective coverage due to the vessel being piloted solo. Now, does that mean they won't do it in the future? Read the last sentence. Now, if a person is sailing solo and is unfamiliar with the offshore experience, in unfamiliar territory, as compared with a seasoned offshore person, there are obviously different circumstances involved with every incident. Now, go back to the statement......Pantaenious has never walked away from coverage in an incident due to solo sailing. Does this mean that they cover a person who is solo sailing? My take was/is this. Sail at your own risk. Solo only if you MUST. I spend a lot of time offshore between F/V Alisha J and S/V Spirit. I'll solo Spirit when I have no alternative. I felt/feel comfortable that Pantaenious would provide legal coverage if an incident occurred. If a person wasn't comfortable offshore alone, I wouldn't encourage them to solo any vessel for a passage other then one of short duration, ie, a daysail. But, and this is important, Pantaenious doesn't, and won't, imply coverage will be there. I hope this is helpful Craig. Best Regards to all, Jeff Spirit Amel 54 #14
On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 08:34 AM, sangaris@... [amelyachtowners] wrote: Hi Jeff, You left us "hanging" - what did Scott Stusek say about you being covered single handed?
I, too, have Pantaenius (America) and they are great (albeit, no claims). One nuance for anyone who may transport their boat is that the policy is totally clear that it does not cover that and you'll need separate insurance during the transport. The transport company made a point of that also and offered an "all-risk" policy for $300. What they don't tell you is that when your boat is being transported it is considered "marine cargo", not a "yacht", and if there is damage you will only get the depreciated value (plus installation cost). Caveat emptor.
Cheers, Craig ---In amelyachtowners@..., wrote : Good Morning Amelians, Just a note on insurance from my perspective. After arriving back in Puerto Real, Puerto Rico after sailing my escape before Maria's arrival, there were a great number of destroyed boats. I spent days with my dinghy helping salvage equipment and personal items with various boat owners. My Norwegian friend had his S/V Strega holed and awash on the beach. We spent days and countless trips back and forth removing everything aboard. They managed to refloat her, and bring her back to the marina. Using my sat phone email connection (ocens software) he made contact with Pantaneous (Europe). They had a group of adjusters in Puerto Rico within weeks (I think it was 2 weeks), and he was one of the first to be contacted. His boat was valued at 60K. He received a check for 64K. They paid him 4K extra for the salvage of the boat. He is allowed to keep the boat as it was declared a wreck. You should see the pictures of it awash. An owners worst nightmare. He had the boat hole reepaired and gel coated the repair. His intention is to keep it. I will join him aboard for a Regatta within a couple months, and Strega is currently sailing. I also had a lengthy discussion with Scott Stusek of Pantaenious America (they cover Spirit). He explained a number of issues I had clearly and without beating around the bush. Our discussion regarding solo sailing was quite enlightening. I had done a 80 hr solo trip to avoid Maria, and wanted to know the stand Pantaenious would have taken in the event of a collision or other event aboard during that trip. I feel very comfortable with Pantaenious coverage. Best Regards to All!
Jeff Spirit Amel 54 #14
Jeff Spirit A On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 04:47 AM, simms@... [amelyachtowners] wrote:
Hi Miles, thanks for this. However I am fortunate not to be one of the major or total loss incidents. We had a surge from a nearby lightning strike. We were not hit but lost a lot of electronics from the surge. The insurers turned themselves inside out to make life as difficult as possible for us. In the end we got everything replaced with new equipment the same as we had. All good but cost us a lot. It was several years ago and all systems have worked fine ever since. I have talked it over with our new broker Regards Danny Sent from my Vodafone Smart On 17 Feb 2018 11:38, "'Miles Bidwell' milesbid@... [amelyachtowners]" < amelyachtowners@...> wrote:
Hello Danny,
I have been following your sad story and I feel very badly for you. It is of no value to you, but, on behalf of others, I want to put in some comments following Eric’s post about Pantaenius insurance. I had Pantaenius for 8 years in Europe after 6 months with Lloyds. Pantaenius was about one-third the cost for better coverage. I didn’t have any claims, but a friend had his boat almost destroyed on the hard by a hurricane in Granada. He said that Pantaenius adjusters were the first on the scene. His boat had a repair estimate (shipping back to France) about the same as the agreed value. He chose to repair and still has the boat. Pantaenius Europe does not insure American owned boats in US waters (they don’t like trial lawyers) so I had to give it up when I came back. Now, Pantaenius has a US company affiliate (subsidiary?) and I again have their insurance. I have an agreed upon value policy that appears to be exactly what they say it is. There is no fine print. We agreed upon the value after I had an appraiser go over my boat and list all of the things that I had added or replaced and the condition and we estimated a market value that Pantaenius accepted without question. I did have a major claim a year ago after something big ran into my boat when it was on a mooring in Newport RI. Pantaenius took care of their part without difficulty for me and without any argument.
Regards,
Miles s/y Ladybug, sm216 in Port du Marin, Martinique
|
|
Bill & Judy Rouse <yahoogroups@...>
Porter,
Insurance is something that changes like the wind.
You might try Velos Insurance UK. Insurance"at"velosgroup.co.uk
They'll be good for you, except not in US waters. They will allow US territorial waters of the Caribbean, and cover you most everywhere except the US.
Ask for Chris Bassett
and tell him that Bill Rouse Ex-BeBe referred you.
I have sent you some more information directly.
|
|
Hi
Porter;
Our
agent based out of Florida has provided us with a more competitive option than
you have received through Lloyds of London. If you are interested, please send
me a private e-mail and I will provide you his information. Our coverage is for
the Med. I'm not sure how they compare in the Caribbean.
Respectfully;
Mohammad and Aty
B&B Kokomo
Amel 54
#099
This is really great information Thank you!:
Especially since Jack Martin can only come up with one quote for our boat
starting April: Pantaenius America. Its 10k we were paying 6k with
Falvey which is not writing yachts anymore.
Thats a big jump as i was told it would go down after our first year of
ownership.
Are others seeing the same situation?
Our specs: 520k and sailing Caribbean and south of the 12 by July.
Always appreciated.
Porter
Porter
McRoberts S/V Ibis: Amel 54-#152 St. Thomas AYH Red Hook
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Craig,
Scott was very
diplomatic in the conversation.
I'll try to summarize
as best as possible.
Pantaenious does not
specifically address the issue of solo sailing. That said, all insurance
coverages expect that the vessel covered has all necessary equipment aboard
for a safe passage, and during passage, posts persons for regular
watches.
The issue is what
happens IF an incident occurs? Will Pantaenious walk away if the vessel was
piloted solo?
Marine law is very
different then "terrestrial law." I know first hand. I lost F/V Elizabeth J
when she was T-boned while scalloping in deep fog south of LI by a 52'
Sportfisherman traveling at 25kts. The Sporty never even slowed down. Sounds
pretty cut and dry right? Guess again.
So, back to the
question.
An incident occurs
while solo sailing, and damages, and/or injuries are involved, Pantaenious has
never walked away from protective coverage due to the vessel being piloted
solo.
Now, does that mean
they won't do it in the future? Read the last sentence.
Now, if a person is
sailing solo and is unfamiliar with the offshore experience, in unfamiliar
territory, as compared with a seasoned offshore person, there are obviously
different circumstances involved with every incident.
Now, go back to the
statement.......Pantaenious has never walked away from coverage in an incident
due to solo sailing.
Does this mean that
they cover a person who is solo sailing?
My take was/is this.
Sail at your own risk. Solo only if you MUST. I spend a lot of time offshore
between F/V Alisha J and S/V Spirit. I'll solo Spirit when I have no
alternative. I felt/feel comfortable that Pantaenious would provide legal
coverage if an incident occurred. If a person wasn't comfortable offshore
alone, I wouldn't encourage them to solo any vessel for a passage other then
one of short duration, ie, a daysail.
But, and this is
important, Pantaenious doesn't, and won't, imply coverage will be
there.
I hope this is helpful
Craig.
Best Regards to
all,
Jeff Spirit Amel 54
#14
On Sat, Feb 17,
2018 at 08:34 AM, sangaris@... [amelyachtowners] wrote:
Hi Jeff,
You left us "hanging" - what did Scott
Stusek say about you being covered single handed?
I, too, have Pantaenius (America) and they
are great (albeit, no claims). One nuance for anyone who may transport their
boat is that the policy is totally clear that it does not cover that and
you'll need separate insurance during the transport. The transport company
made a point of that also and offered an "all-risk" policy for $300.
What they don't tell you is that when your boat is being transported it is
considered "marine cargo", not a "yacht", and if there is damage you will
only get the depreciated value (plus installation cost). Caveat
emptor.
Cheers, Craig
---In amelyachtowners@...,
wrote :
Good Morning
Amelians,
Just a note on
insurance from my perspective.
After arriving back
in Puerto Real, Puerto Rico after sailing my escape before Maria's arrival,
there were a great number of destroyed boats. I spent days with my dinghy
helping salvage equipment and personal items with various boat owners.
My Norwegian friend
had his S/V Strega holed and awash on the beach. We spent days and countless
trips back and forth removing everything aboard. They managed to refloat
her, and bring her back to the marina.
Using my sat phone
email connection (ocens software) he made contact with Pantaneous (Europe).
They had a group of adjusters in Puerto Rico within weeks (I think it was 2
weeks), and he was one of the first to be contacted. His boat was valued at
60K. He received a check for 64K. They paid him 4K extra for the salvage of
the boat. He is allowed to keep the boat as it was declared a wreck. You
should see the pictures of it awash. An owners worst nightmare. He had the
boat hole reepaired and gel coated the repair. His intention is to keep it.
I will join him aboard for a Regatta within a couple months, and Strega is
currently sailing.
I also had a lengthy
discussion with Scott Stusek of Pantaenious America (they cover Spirit). He
explained a number of issues I had clearly and without beating around the
bush. Our discussion regarding solo sailing was quite enlightening. I had
done a 80 hr solo trip to avoid Maria, and wanted to know the stand
Pantaenious would have taken in the event of a collision or other event
aboard during that trip.
I feel very
comfortable with Pantaenious coverage..
Best Regards to
All!
Jeff Spirit Amel 54
#14
Jeff Spirit A
On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 04:47 AM,
simms@... [amelyachtowners] wrote:
Hi Miles,
thanks for this. However I am fortunate not to be one of the major or
total loss incidents. We had a surge from a nearby lightning strike.. We
were not hit but lost a lot of electronics from the surge. The insurers
turned themselves inside out to make life as difficult as possible for
us.. In the end we got everything replaced with new equipment the same as
we had. All good but cost us a lot. It was several years ago and all
systems have worked fine ever since. I have talked it over with our new
broker Regards Danny
Sent from my
Vodafone Smart
On 17 Feb
2018 11:38, "'Miles Bidwell' milesbid@... [amelyachtowners]" < amelyachtowners@...>
wrote:
Hello Danny,
I have been following
your sad story and I feel very badly for you. It is of no value to
you, but, on behalf of others, I want to put in some comments
following Eric’s post about Pantaenius insurance. I had Pantaenius
for 8 years in Europe after 6 months with Lloyds. Pantaenius was
about one-third the cost for better coverage. I didn’t have any
claims, but a friend had his boat almost destroyed on the hard by a
hurricane in Granada. He said that Pantaenius adjusters were the
first on the scene. His boat had a repair estimate (shipping back
to France) about the same as the agreed value. He chose to repair
and still has the boat. Pantaenius Europe does not
insure American owned boats in US waters (they don’t like trial lawyers)
so I had to give it up when I came back.
Now, Pantaenius has a
US company affiliate (subsidiary?) and I again have their
insurance. I have an agreed upon value policy that appears to be
exactly what they say it is. There is no fine print. We
agreed upon the value after I had an appraiser go over my boat and list
all of the things that I had added or replaced and the condition and we
estimated a market value that Pantaenius accepted without
question. I did have a major claim a year ago after
something big ran into my boat when it was on a mooring in Newport RI.
Pantaenius took care of their part without difficulty for me
and without any argument.
Regards,
Miles s/y
Ladybug, sm216 in Port du Marin,
Martinique
|
|
Porter,
We have been with Pantaenius America for 3 years, and did see a jump this year of about 20%. Our premium cost per insured dollar value is almost identical to what you were quoted. The big change this year was that they no longer covered ANY sailing in the Caribbean (south of 31N) from July 1 to Oct 31. They would only cover a boat on the hard, strapped down in a keel pit, and that at double the premium.
We asked if there was a corner of the southwestern Caribbean where they would cover during storm season, and their answer was simple: "No."
One big change in the overall insurance market for midrange yachts like ours, is the number of companies writing policies is greatly reduced from last year. The good news is that these should be the best managed and most carefully run companies, the bad news is that the reduced competition will not be good for rates in the future.
I can only imagine the insurance cost increase that the large charter companies are seeing for the fleets they keep in the Caribbean hurricane belt year round!
Bill Kinney SM160, Harmonie Freeport, Bahamas ---In amelyachtowners@..., <portermcroberts@...> wrote : This is really great information Thank you!: Especially since Jack Martin can only come up with one quote for our boat starting April: Pantaenius America. Its 10k we were paying 6k with Falvey which is not writing yachts anymore. Thats a big jump as i was told it would go down after our first year of ownership.
Are others seeing the same situation?
Our specs: 520k and sailing Caribbean and south of the 12 by July.
Always appreciated.
Porter Porter McRoberts S/V Ibis: Amel 54-#152 St. Thomas AYH Red Hook
|
|

Porter McRoberts
Thanks Bill. Appreciated.
Had a guy come out to the boat. We took the old filter back to his shop. Cut it open. Lots of metal inside. I am going to get a new transmission unless you argue against it. It solves both problems. Mystery air ( transmission guy here was also scratching his head as to a solution, and no he doesn’t sell tranny’s,) and metal loss on gears. I spoke to the ZF dealer in Florida. He said on all ZFs older than 4-5 years they would routinely machine off 10/1000” to make the cup fit into the cylinder. This was a common problem.
Problem is I am dead in the water without a good tranny.
Any guidance is always appreciated.
Thanks Porter. Excuse the errors. Sent from my IPhone
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
On Feb 20, 2018, at 6:55 PM, 'Bill & Judy Rouse' yahoogroups@... [amelyachtowners] < amelyachtowners@...> wrote:
Porter,
Insurance is something that changes like the wind.
You might try Velos Insurance UK. Insurance"at"velosgroup.co.uk
They'll be good for you, except not in US waters. They will allow US territorial waters of the Caribbean, and cover you most everywhere except the US.
Ask for Chris Bassett
and tell him that Bill Rouse Ex-BeBe referred you.
I have sent you some more information directly.
|
|